Just ran across this while searching for something else. Ouch 😵

The survey also found 44% of respondents stayed at home because they feared abuse or harassment…

Two thirds felt depressed because of loneliness and over a third do not leave the house most days.

(Survey reveals half of autistic adults ā€˜abused by someone they regarded as a friend’. Actually, I initially ran across a thing with SBC using figures from that survey, but had to go looking for a non-SBC source. Got tired of searching before I could find anything on the actual NAS site.)

But yeah, we’re right back around to the “Enough in Atlanta” factor.

And most of the respondents there probably did not stand out in as many other ways. Can’t even figure out what exactly is setting these assholes off most of the time, but it really can be a problem.

(Popping into mind from another context: ā€œcannot distinguish the racism from the homophobia from the sexismā€. Throw in ableism to complicate things further.)

Anyway, probably not just imagining there is something not right there, or severely overreacting to minor stuff–along with almost half of people asked.

For me, it’s more likely to be that I am sick/in pain and low enough on spoons going out to begin with, and just do not have any to spare for dealing with totally unsolicited obnoxious behavior from randos. That has been a major deciding factor for just saying fuck it and staying home on so many occasions.

I still don’t feel like I can talk about that much, in case it gets interpreted as all “just” a mental health issue. Including being sick/in pain at all. (Not to dismiss what really are primarily anxiety-driven reasons. I’ve just had too many bad experiences in that direction when anxiety was really not the main problem.)

My partner does not seem big on that kind of approach, or I wouldn’t want to live with that. But, again, enough bad experiences–including with straight up victim blaming–that I would rather have most people think it’s just the physical disability stuff keeping me at home. It all gets frustrating.

shinyhappygoth:

lilyvonpseudonym:

schmergo:

I do not dislike steampunk, I just dislike gears in places that make no sense. Why are there gears on your hat? Is it a steam-powered hat? What does that MEAN? Keep ya ears extra toasty? Do you shovel coal into your hat? Sounds messy. Like, there are times that even hat gears serve a purpose. Do the gears operate a timepiece on your hat? Acceptable. Do they connect to a clockwork spine prosthesis that allows you to walk? Pretty cool.

Are there just LOOSE GEARS that don’t even line up to anything else on your hat but are just there to remind people that you COULD be creating a fabulous invention if you weren’t so busy calling people ā€˜gentlesirs’ on the internet? Enjoy your botulism and lead poisoning from your cool Victorian-style meatpacking factories!

The hat gear tightens and loosens the band, for those days when me head swells up.

That happens a lot to the kind of steampunk people who put gears on their hats.

I’m fine with one or two loose gears, because I can imagine having some that were incorrectly cut or something and deciding ā€œwhat the heck, I’ll just accessorize with them.ā€ I firmly agree, however, that most of your gears should appear functional.

vilesbian:

ā€œIt’s not that Jackson had a ā€˜dark side’, as his apologists rationalize and which all human beings have, but rather that Jackson was the Dark Knight in the formation of the United States as a colonialist, imperialist democracy, a dynamic formation that continues to constitute the core of US patriotism. The most revered presidents – Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Wilson, both Roosevelts, Truman, Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, Obama – have each advanced popular imperialism while gradually increasing inclusion of other groups beyond the core of descendants of old settlers into the ruling mythology. All the presidents after Jackson march in his footsteps. Consciously or not, they refer back to him on what is acceptable, how to reconcile democracy and genocide and characterize it as freedom for the people.

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz in An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States

tarastarr1:

thecoggs:

So apparently last year the National Park Service in the US dropped an over 1200 page study of LGBTQ American History as part of their Who We Are program which includes studies on African-American history, Latino history, and Indigenous history.Ā 

Like. This is awesome. But also it feels very surreal that maybe one of the most comprehensive examinations of LGBTQ history in America (it covers sports! art! race! historical sites! health! cities!) was just casually done by the parks service.Ā 

This is really great??

onehellofascene:

GERTIE BROWN & SAINT SUTTLE

ā€œSomething Good-Negro Kiss,ā€ the newly discovered William Selig silent film from 1898 is believed to be the earliest cinematic depiction of African-American affection. Thanks to scholars at the University of Chicago and the University of Southern California, the footage is prompting a rethinking of early film history. The performance by cakewalk partnersĀ Saint Suttle and Gertie Brown is a reinterpretation of Thomas Edison’s ā€œThe Kiss,ā€ featuring May Irwin and John Rice.Ā The film was announced December 12, 2018 as a new addition to the Library of Congress’ National Film Registry—one of 25 selected for their enduring importance to American culture. The 29-second clip is free of stereotypes and racist caricatures, a stark contrast from the majority of black performances at the turn of the century.

jenroses:

A couple people have asked if they can use the Fork Theory if they’re not (fill in whatever, I don’t care.)

The short answer is,Ā ā€œOf course.ā€

I’d like to just say that gatekeeping takes up too much energy, uses too many spoons and sticks forks in people.

Both hubby and I deal with chronic mental and physical health issues. Mine are more obvious–severe rheumatoid arthritis on top of a stack of other issues will do that to you. But ā€œrunning out of spoonsā€ happens even to people who do have the physical ability to exercise, for example. Just because someone starts out their day with more spoons, or bigger spoons, doesn’t mean they can’t run out. And EVERYONE has a fork limit.Ā 

This was designed to be a corollary, not a substitute, and I would not for a second limit who could use this idea. Everyone, disabled or not, has limits to what they can take.Ā 

In fact, the difference, in many cases, between an able-bodied person and a disabled person, between a person without mental health diagnoses and someone with mental health diagnoses is very small, and can be encompassed by one word.

The word?

YET.

You live long enough, life is going to throw trauma your way. You live long enough, you will experience disability.Ā 

And if you don’t, well, apparently you are terminally unlucky.Ā 

Seriously, gatekeeping this particular thing is a zero sum game and I really wish people wouldn’t. We need the curb cutter effect of able-bodied people understanding our metaphors. Of being able to shorthand something and have someone else go, ā€œAh, I understand.ā€

It’s tempting for me, with how disabled I am, how much more disabled I’ve been at times, to think, ā€œOh, no one could really understand how bad this isā€ with the undercurrent of (I assume I’m handling this badly compared to everyone else, but if I’m the only one feeling this way, and others don’t understand, then it’s not my fault.)

The fact of the matter is that disability is hard, and isolating and literally anyone who went through what I have gone through would have a hard time with it. I don’t have to feel guilty about not dealing very well with it.

My sister said to me once, and it stuck with me forever, ā€œThis shit is objectively hard.ā€

And yeah, RA is. Lupus is. Thyroiditis and Ehlers Danlos and allergies and asthma and sleep apnea and depression and isolation and dealing with the current political situation and worrying about money and stressing about jobs and kids and and and and… this stuff is hard. Lots of people can deal okay with a couple of issues, some people deal gracefully with some huge issues and most of us? Just muddle along doing our best and it would behoove us to assume that others are also trying.Ā 

We discover in our online communities commonality of experience, that we are not alone in our not-dealing-very-well, that when some people are dealing better it may be because they have more resources or know information that they can share with others.Ā 

If we forget that the reason we come together is for understanding, and start to shut people out… we’re just part of someone else’s bad day. And I’d rather not.

(Oh, and as for the knife theory, it’s pretty damn simple… in this context, knives are the things you bleed from when you pull them out, the things that make triggers, the lasting traumas, the actual aggression. They’re the things you may need medical or mental health attention to heal from.)Ā  Ā 

markv5-translated:

markv5:

ŠžŠžŠ¾Š¾Š¾Š¾, сейчас я тебе помогу ŃŃ‚Š¾ все ŠæŃ€ŠøŠŗŠ»ŠµŠøŃ‚ŃŒā€¦. По всему Гому!!!

ŠžŠžŠ¾Š¾Š¾Š¾, сейчас я тебе помогу ŃŃ‚Š¾ все ŠæŃ€ŠøŠŗŠ»ŠµŠøŃ‚ŃŒā€¦. По всему Гому!!!

Oooooh, now I will help you to stick it all …. Throughout the house !!!