Trump Hasn’t Needed The Wall To Remake U.S. Immigration Policy

theliberaltony:

via Politics – FiveThirtyEight

President Trump and congressional Democrats are fighting over how much the U.S. government should spend on Trump’s proposed border wall, risking another government shutdown because of a dispute over immigration policy. However those negotiations turn out, though, here’s the thing: The massive wall, which Trump has said would stretch 1,000 miles across the U.S.-Mexico border, is very unlikely to be built, at least at that size. Mexico is not paying for it, and Congress is unlikely to put up much money for it.

You could call the wall’s meager prospects a major defeat for Trump, but that risks missing the point. The wall is something of an abstraction. Trump, in his two years in office, has already made U.S. policy much, much more resistant to immigration — without Congress agreeing to his wall or really any of his immigration ideas. There is no physical wall, but there are all kinds of new barriers for people who want to come to the United States and for undocumented immigrants who want to stay.

Here’s what we can measure, over the past two years:

  1. Many fewer refugees are allowed into the country. The U.S. resettled about 97,000 refugees in 2016, Barack Obama’s last full year in office. (Obama made resettling more refugees a priority for his administration.) But that number plunged to 33,000 in 2017, after Trump enacted a temporary ban on refugees in his first week in office. It is likely to drop even further in 2018. Refugee resettlement declined around the world in 2017, but the drop was disproportionately big in the U.S. and partly attributable, according to experts, to Trump administration policies.
  2. The U.S. now takes in very few Muslim refugees. The U.S. allowed in about 39,000 Muslim refugees in the period from October 2015 through September 2016, when Obama was president. (This data is compiled by federal fiscal year.) From October 2017 through September 2018 — the first full fiscal year under Trump — about 3,500 Muslim refugees were admitted. In the last full fiscal year under Obama, slightly more Muslims were admitted than Christians. Now, Christian refugees are much more likely than Muslims to be allowed to resettle in the U.S.
  3. Immigration law enforcement is much more aggressive within the U.S. Much of the national immigration discussion is focused on the U.S.-Mexico border. But Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency that enforces immigration laws away from the border, is where some of the biggest changes are happening. In the fiscal year that covered much of Trump’s first year in office, ICE made about 143,000 arrests, compared with 110,000 during the last complete fiscal year of Obama’s presidency.
  4. People from countries included in Trump’s travel ban basically can’t come here. Comparing fiscal year 2016 with January through May of 2018, the U.S. has issued far fewer visas in an average month to people from Iran, Syria and Yemen — at least an 80 percent drop for each country. There has been an even larger drop in the number of visas granted to people from Iran and Yemen who want to move to the U.S. permanently.
  5. The number of migrant children in detention has exploded (most came to the U.S. without their parents, but some have been separated from them). Under Obama, when migrant children crossed the border illegally, they often ended up living with relatives or family friends, and immigration analysts say that the Trump administration has made the process of getting children into the homes of family members or friends more complicated. They say some families are less willing to come forward and be sponsors because they’re worried about interacting with government officials and potentially being accused of some immigration-related crime. In May 2017, in the early stages of the Trump administration, 2,400 children were in federal shelters for migrant children. In September, that number was above 12,000.

Those are just the areas of immigration policy with the clearest data. I have no doubt that the Trump administration’s immigration changes are having other effects that we can’t measure as well. Here are some of the potential shifts that are harder to track:

  1. How many thousands of people might have applied to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (which allows young immigrants who were brought here illegally as children to remain in the U.S and be guaranteed not to be deported) if the Trump administration had not announced the end of the program and tried to wind it down? (So far, federal courts have blocked this move, arguing that the administration has not followed proper regulatory procedures.)
  2. How many people have not applied for asylum to the U.S., as the administration has taken steps to make it harder to do so?
  3. How many people who live abroad but wanted to come to the U.S. for jobs have not done so, as the administration has complicated the process to apply for some work permits and visas?
  4. How many people have not tried to immigrate to the U.S. because of the Trump policy (which was ended) that resulted in children being separated from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border or because of the use of tear gas on some migrants? (Tear gas was used at times by the Obama administration, but Obama did not strongly defend the practice in public, as Trump has. There were some family separations by the Obama administration, but it did not publicly embrace that practice either.)

Much of the political debate has focused on why Trump is taking all these steps: Is it because immigration is an economic or security threat to the U.S., as the president has said? Or is it because he opposes the country becoming less white and less Christian? I think the evidence points pretty strongly toward the second explanation, the white identity politics one.

But while understanding his reasoning is important, there’s little dispute about the effects of Trump’s policies. Wall or no, a lot has already happened, and more big changes could be on the way. The wall is a story. But the story is how Trump has already remade U.S. immigration policy.

Trump Hasn’t Needed The Wall To Remake U.S. Immigration Policy

moonibinbon:

friendlyinternetmeerkat:

hi-def-doritos:

acejokes:

sayitwithsarcophilus:

comparativelysuperlative:

lauren-m-jankowski:

boomsnapwhist:

raygender:

bi-privilege:

dinosaurs-on-wheels:

how can someone be asexual? i’m glad you asked. obviously i can’t speak for all of us but i for one lost my sexuality in a drunken game of poker against captain jack harkness.

how multisexuals are made: we win our sexuality off the asexuals

us graysexuals have a more nuanced agreement, we get our sexuality back on weekends and on holidays we occasionally borrow someone else’s

sexuality banking

I’m crying! 😂

Fractional reserve sexuality.

I lost most of my sexual attraction in a game of high stakes Apples To Apples in college, but later I found some bits and bobs between the couch cushions.

Demisexuals never lost theirs as such, but they keep it packed in layers of tissue paper in a box in the basement next to the fine china and only bring it out for special occasions.

I traded mine to become a dragon.

I bartered off my attraction with a cleric for the chance to cast some wicked cool spells to give myself an eternal supply of cake. #noregrets

I nabbed some extra sexuality off my three non-internet best friends who all happen to be ace

@tenderhearthufflepuff, @demonickittykat, and @emi-loves-them.

Jack’s just been winning it off of people ever since he got his immortality and sending it back to his younger self

ferenofnopewood:

fierceawakening:

lordhellebore:

themintycupcake:

eroticcannibal:

johniaurens:

tempest-caller:

ace-angel:

queenrecluse:

imp:

keysmashsound:

spacesocialist:

this is a cult ezra you’re describing a cult

i dont knwo what any of this says

h

what did i say

this isn’t a cult lmao please read up on how cults function before you call any group of people that have sex with more than one person a cult

“Polyamory is basically like a cult” wow fuck you too

a poly man: i’m in a relationship with a bunch of people and if other people want to join this relationship the process is kind of selective because i don’t want to date just anyone i want to date people who i click with and there’s a lot of people involved who also get a say because i want my partners to like each other

Woke monogamous ppl on tumblr dot edu: This is LITERALLY a cult? this Literally describes a Cult?

Op just admit you are mad you could never get more than one person to put up with you hshshdjjdjsjsj

Like, no duh it’s kind of selective? Dating is selective. Polyamorous dating isn’t less selective than monogamous dating. Don’t call things cults unless they meet the actual definition of a cult because words actually mean things, OP. Demonizing queer people isn’t cute.

Yeah, unlike what some people might believe, we don’t just fuck anyone. Nothing cult-like about, you know, wanting to choose your partners based on certain standards, like…you know…everyone else.

This is… a really weird uncharitable description of a poly relationship by someone who has never listened to a damn word the person in that relationship said about it.

(I say this as a n obligate mono person who doesn’t really get it either, fwiw. But WOW. The framing here is just…. y i k e s)

Is the way the dude phrased things a little weird? Yeah. But if Jeff Goldblum got up there and said he felt like he’d married his wife 25 lifetimes ago the moment they met, y’all be calling it #goals

This, btw, is what polyam people are talking about when we say “sometimes we face bigotry or oppression for being polyam.” Because OP’s attitude isn’t unusual. Framing a polycule as a “sex cult” is the go-to #1 way even vaguely socially conservative people see us. This is the exact shit that makes us very careful about who we let know about our situations, because shit like this gets you out of a job, or CPS’d, etc.

And god help you if you happen to be a man in a polycule that’s primarily women or that includes at least one lesbian. (Fun fact: Everyone in the polycule isn’t necessarily fucking everyone else in the polycule) Because no matter when you came in or what your position is, you WILL be assumed to be the “leader” of the thing and absolutely will be assumed predatory by assholes like OP. Even in queer spaces, people will be checking on your partners, trying to convince them that they don’t “have” to stay with you.

And while the sentiment behind it is good (trying to make sure people aren’t in situations they don’t want, trying to keep an eye out for possible creepos), it’s also goddamn exhausting.

h-mmrice:

amuseoffyre:

rufeepeach:

thespiralpath:

Source: https://twitter.com/ImpPoster

This.

It’s genuinely worrying to me how often white supremacist misogynist dudes have a weird Viking obsession. The Vikings did not agree with you. Stop dragging the Vikings into this.

Right-wingers: We should treat the Muslims like the Vikings did!
Me: You mean travel thousands of miles to strike up profitable trade deals with them in their own countries and establish mutually beneficial business arrangements?
Right-wingers: Wot?

@deadcatwithaflamethrower