autismserenity:

heterosexually:

marxferatu:

can you imagine how many people would be able to leave abusive situations if housing was free

My psychology professor actually did a longitudinal study in our state with women in abusive relationships where they have three different groups different options one of which being a year of rent free apartments if they did not speak to or allow their abuser to contact them again and of all the women only one lost her apartment for not adhering to the rules. When he other women were checked up on in their apartments they had new jobs, looked so much happier and just overall like different women, and were really thriving. Also if you think a year of free housing is expensive you have no real idea how much domestic violence really costs our country.

I was thinking last night about what it might look like if an organization, or the movement, focused on bi issues.

the first thing I thought of was that, if 25% of bisexuals in the United States are on food stamps, then maybe we should be pushing for a minimum basic income.

maybe when I get outraged emails from GLSEN or Equality CA about things Congress is doing, some of those emails should be about cuts to programs like food stamps, as well as the (very very important) ones about health care.

Relationship abuse is such a huge, huge issue in the bi community. This stuff in the post above should be a focus too. We should be pushing really hard for free housing. For survivors, and for anyone who’s homeless.

That’s going to include a disproportionate number of queer people anyway, and especially queer youth; but it’s also the right thing to do.

can I ask why you think bi women can reclaim dyke? you’d have to be the only lesbian I know who has that opinion

cardozzza:

wlwellbutrin:

1. bi women do get called dyke by people who are fully aware they’re bi and not lesbians. cishets don’t really distinguish between women who affirm attraction to other women nearly as much as people on this site would lead you to believe

2. “lesbian” history has always included women we would now identify as bisexual. i have no problem with lesbian and bisexual becoming distinct identity labels, but that doesn’t mean we can deny bi women their own history

3. bi women are not my oppressors. they are in fact the only political group that shares my experience of dealing with both homophobia and misogyny; our differences in experience are not differences in possession of power. at the end of the day, they don’t have the power to enact social harm against me, and even if points 1 and 2 weren’t true, their reclamation of dyke really wouldn’t be the end of the world. i’m much more concerned with, say, ending corrective rape and addressing bi women’s astronomical rates of ipv than with nitpicking who’s allowed to use a slur that cishets throw at both of us anyway.

There’s so many lesbians who think that too lol… especially in real life where the opinion tends to be more ‘who cares, why not?’ than anything else.

qwertybard:

slurhater:

seriously though bisexuality being defined as attraction to men and women is a heterosexual’s definition of bisexuality actual bisexual groups and organizations have been defining it as attraction to two or more genders or same and other genders since the nineties and plenty of nb people actually id as bi and refusing to accept how we define ourselves is so absurdly biphobic and heterosexist and jfc it’s 2014 can other queer people fucking realize and acknowledge this

The purple stripe on the bi flag is meant to represent attraction to nb genders and the bisexual manifesto published in Anything That Moves includes the lines “Do not assume that bisexuality is binary or duogamous in nature … In fact, don’t assume that there are only two genders.” That was published in 1990. It’s older than a lot of people here, including me, and older than terms like “pansexual” and “polysexual” by at least a decade. Bi history is important.

queerascat:

bi-trans-alliance:

bi-trans-alliance:

Boston Bisexual Women’s Network, Christopher Street Liberation Day, New York City, 1983. (Yes, that is bi activist @robynochs in the photo!)

Note: Bi Women Boston is still around 34 years later and regularly holds potlucks!

You can also check out the publication Bi Women Quarterly, edited by @robynochs!

updated links: Bi Women Quarterly [ Current Issue ] & [ Archive ]

dreamy-bisexuall:

dreamy-bisexual:

dreamy-bisexual:

bi women asking to not be written off based on relationship status =/= “forcing you to care about m/f relationships”, so jot that down

honestly this wouldn’t be an issue if people viewed bi women as fully fledged humans and not units within a relationship (usually m/f ones because people LOVE to treat us as extensions to men)

so what if she’s in a monogomous relationship with a man? she’s a whole person who has a whole world and identity outside of it. To deny her community based on relationship status is to deny her personhood outside of her relationships.

and to deny her personhood outside of her relationships is to isolate her and make her more susceptible to abuse from straight men!

thoughts while driving home from work

moncarnetdenote:

autismserenity:

thegentlewomon:

acephobia-is-real:

mylittlscorpion:

garet-the-3rd:

autismserenity:

sirigorn:

autismserenity:

life-of-a-cherry-blossom:

autismserenity:

If you think of asexual as “not having a sex drive,” then you’d probably be surprised to learn that aces used to be a part of the bi community.

But if you think of it as “not having a sexual orientation,” then it might suddenly become clear.

Because in a world where so many people only ever think of, or mention, “gay or straight” as possible orientations, there’s not that much difference between “not having a sexual orientation” and “not being either gay or straight.”

When the question is only framed as “which of these opposite points does your arrow point to,” I don’t feel like there’s a huge difference between your answer being “point???????” or “arrow???????”

Ohhh, everything makes sense now (says the bi ace)

SWEEET

Which is I think why a lot of aces identify as bi or pan at some point in their lives before landing on “asexual.” If you know you’re not gay or straight, there’s much more awareness of bisexuality than of asexuality, so it makes sense that people would end up there by default. 

Yes! And if you were coming out 20 oror more years ago, there was basically zero awareness of any other things.

this perfectly describes my late teens, most of which I spent convinced I was bisexual because I was equally attracted to men and women. Thing is, I actually wasn’t attracted to either, and I thought that that weird uncomfortable feeling I got each time something was overly sexualized was because I wasn’t used to feeling lust and/or arousal, and those new urges were making me uncomfortable, instead of just being plain uncomfortable with sexualization. I didn’t even know that asexuality was a thing until I read about it in a fanfic a year ago.

Chiming in as another aro/ace person who identified as bi for a couple years before realizing the ace spectrum existed. The poster right above me pretty much describes exactly my thought process. Basically, it went:

I’m not gay, and I’m definitely not straight, so I must be bi, because I find people of many different genders attractive (notice i say find attractive, not attracted to). I chalked my icky-squirmy feelings when thinking about sex and to a lesser extent relationships up to lack of experience as I’ve never been in a relationship or even been on a date.

But then in the past year or two I finally learned about asexuality and one night I had this huge emotional revelation when things just clicked suddenly.

So yeah, until recently, bi is where i fit best, and where i felt most accepted.

Up until now I thought “ace ppl were bi/pan?? that makes no sense????’

But reading this I remember–I thought I was bi/pan too!! When I was in high school, I thought I was romantically attracted to men nd sexually attracted to women (I knew almost nothing about gender). I didn’t know about split-attraction so I was horrified of being some kind of freak and doomed to be alone and/or unhappy, to say the least.

People get all offended and insulted and furious about how aces identified as bi/pan, but you need to understand: I only did so because I didn’t know/think asexuality was an option. I wasn’t gay, I wasn’t straight. What else could I be?

At 15, when I was just starting to use the internet to learn about sexuality I came across this: “Bisexuality is the ability to reach down someone’s pants and not care about whatever you find.” And that was, I thought, the closest thing I could find about how I felt.

You might be thinking, “But this is such a wild contradiction to what asexuality is! How could you possibly be bi/pan?” In my experience at least, the logic was something like, “Being bi/pan is an attraction to all genders, but I don’t experience attraction to two+/any gender. Which is similar in that I’m equally indifferent to multiple/all genders. They cancel out, or something? I’m romantically attracted to men, sexually to women, they cancel out?”

When you don’t know what asexuality is, you’re going to come to some conclusions that may make no sense at all to someone else. And they might not make sense to you, either. But what choice do you have? You have to be SOMETHING, or so we’re taught.

And then once I realized I wasn’t REALLY bi or pan, I chose not to identify as anything, since no labels fit me. I thought it would be freeing, not having to worry about labels. But god, it was so lonely. Here I was, some kind of anolomy, brimming with so many questions and no answers. And this is why asexuality is an orientation, rather than a lack of a sexuality. Ahaha, high school was misery in terms of finding my sexuality.

I don’t know, does this make sense to anyone? It’s hard to explain, at least for me.

“I’m nothing” eventually became a common response for me as well.

and gee, I wonder if the feeling of “I’m nothing” contributes to the higher rates of suicidality for a-spec people, like bi erasure does for bi people

for that matter, I wonder if the double whammy of “what I am doesn’t exist” and “what I think I am doesn’t exist”, of bi erasure and the even worse ace erasure, does too

and by “I wonder if” I mean “I bet that….”

I relate so fucking much about everything said in this post. I also identified shortly as bi, then pan, before landing on the “nothing” phase, that made me feel like such a worthless human being. Finding out about asexuality was both a terrifying and liberating experience. It was hard at first coming to terms with it for me, but when it did happen there was this humongous feeling of relief, that I was normal

So when I first found out that asexuality was a part of the bisexual community before splitting up, it made a whole lot of sense already to me. It was pretty logical.

fierceawakening:

betterthanyouineveryway:

qwertybard:

qwertybard:

I really hate how, in conversations about bi women and their partners in LGBT+ spaces, male partners are always assumed to be straight and cis

like, bi/pan/queer men exist. trans men exist. and it’s not some impossibility that they date bpq women, especially if they meet each other in LGBT+ spaces. I have literally never had a straight cis man as a partner and I don’t intend to for personal reasons, and I don’t think I’m the only bi woman for whom the prospect of dating a cis straight man seems at best exhausting and at worst disgusting.

this is yet another reason why “het partnered” isn’t a good descriptor btw. there are m/f relationships where literally no partners are het.

it’s like everything in the life of a bisexual woman is assumed to revolve around straight men.

nothing I am and nothing I do revolves around straight men.

A small addition: While it is important to know that some bi women don’t/haven’t/won’t date cishet men, and to not assume so, it’s also important to remember that some of them do, and they shouldn’t be shamed for that. They’re not any less LGBT+ for dating a cishet man (or any man, for that matter).

I hope I’m not intruding, but I thought it was important to say.

Also: THIS.