autismserenity:

palpablenotion:

candidlyautistic:

spiroandthelacktones:

swirlymind:

snakedance:

clutchwokeup:

the autistic ping

Look, we’re not actually narcissists

When you talk to us about an emotional issue

And we respond with a personal experience or anecdote

We’re not trying to make the conversation about ourselves.

Most times (at least with me), I have to find an experience within myself that is similar to what you’ve described

So I can furnish an appropriate emotional reaction to what you’re experiencing.

It’s sort of like when you ping an IP address to fix a faulty Wi-Fi connection.

It’s not personal, it’s just how I navigate Feelings™.

This is how many people on the Autism spectrum express empathy.  We don’t say things like “You must have felt so…” like neurotypical people are used to.  To us, that comes across as presuming to know.  We look to when we felt something that seems similar, and offer that experience.  That lets the other person decide whether we truly know how they feel.

When I do this I am trying to show you that I really do know how you feel, and not just saying something arbitrary to make you feel better. Since I’m not good at showing and expressing emotions or even knowing exactly what it is I am feeling, I barely know what others are feeling. But by relating situation to situation, I’m acknowledging what they are feeling now and that I felt a similar way once, so that any advice I give can sound like I’m feeling the right emotion.

Oh I had no idea this was an autism thing I always respond to people by talking about situations where I felt similarly

Literally this is so common they test for it during the diagnostic process.

the annoying thing about this is that people always think i’m a one upper, who do something almost identical (and certainly looks identical to a casual observer) except the one upper usually just gives an analogous situation that was much worse/more intense/even more extraordinary
when an autistic person does this, the important part is the feelings, not the event, and i always worry someone is thinking i’m one upping

THIS IS AN AUTISTIC THING????

Omg my mind is being blown here. I have known so many people who did this that I figured it was The Socially Correct And Acceptable Response?!

And I tried to learn how to Do It Right! Because my thinking was, “I don’t really know how to have or express the right emotion, so how am I going to share a related experience that is the right one for what they’re feeling?!”

So I really studied how people did that, and how people responded to my stories, and put a ton of energy into figuring out what to share and when, so that I’d be Socially Correct, instead of always just being like, “That sucks!”

OMG OMG I was learning from autistics all alonnnnng

do i even know ANY allistic people?! everything I thought I knew has been overthrown by this one post, I want to take a nap

scissortailedsaint:

this problem isn’t that men “misread” signals (and even verbal statements), it’s that men are unwilling to accept what’s being communicated, because it’d mean they won’t get what they want–and they value getting what they want more than they value their partner’s comfort, safety, and desires. this is a matter of will and values masquerading as a matter of knowledge and communication. men’s “confusion” is their justification for continuing with what they want to do (and society will accept it too!), so there’s always a motivation to be “confused.” that’s the problem.

Some relevant research: Mythcommunication: It’s Not That They Don’t Understand, They Just Don’t Like The Answer

How do you refuse to be monogamous with someone who won’t have sex without pressuring people into sex?

theunitofcaring:

(I had trouble parsing this ask at first, so if anyone else also has trouble parsing it, I think anon is asking, “if you want to date someone, but you don’t want to be monogamous with them because they don’t want to have sex, aren’t you creating a lot of pressure for them to have sex with you, if they want to be monogamously dating you?”)

I think you need to be good at communication, and both of you need to be good at evaluating your own needs and wants and anticipating how certain decisions will make you feel. I think you kind of need those things in relationships anyway, but you definitely need them more in some kinds of relationship.

Here’s an example of a conversation (which I didn’t have, but which involves the kind of communication that happens in my relationships):

A: Having sex is really important to me, and I think in the long run I won’t be happy in a monogamous relationship without sex. 

B: I’m upset about that, because I love you and want to keep dating but I don’t want to have sex. I guess we could try having sex.

A: Um. That doesn’t sound like a good solution at all? Let me try to figure out why I feel that way – so, for one thing, I expect that you wouldn’t be very happy, and I love you and I don’t want that, and also it’s hard to imagine it would be good for our relationship. And for another, I said ‘having sex is really important to me’ but when I think about it more, what’s actually important to me is having a relationship in which I am sexually desired and someone is excited about having sex with me. 

B: Yeah, that isn’t going to be me. I’m really hurt.

A: I understand. I’m sorry, this sucks. I am still happy right now, for what it’s worth, I just mentioned this because I was starting to realize this was important to me. How do you feel about being in a not-monogamous relationship?

B: Scared. I might be okay with it, if it turned out not to feature the things I’m scared of, but scared.

Some necessary elements: conversations which are likely to make someone feel pressured should happen in the format that lets everyone think best (which might mean over text chat instead of in person, or in person but not at certain times.) If you need to have a conversation about sex which might make someone feel pressured, definitely don’t have it in bed and then have sex if that’s the conclusion of the conversation, give people time to think and process and change their minds and maybe discuss with other friends.

Whether this works depends a lot on how you communicate and how your partners communicate, and I am lucky to date very honest, self-aware, introspective people who I trust to be good at asking themselves “what do I want, and how will I feel if we make it happen”. That doesn’t make relationship decisions less intense and painful and awful and hard, but it means that if someone says “I think this is what’s best for me right now, given what you’ve communicated about what is best for you”, I can expect that they’re probably right, and if they’re wrong they’ll notice and we’ll talk about it. 

If, like, you’re in As position but you would actually be happy to be monogamous with B if B is willing to have sex, then this conversation is harder, and that’s not one I’ve ever had to have, but I do think it’s possible if B is a person who is really great at knowing what they want, communicating it, noticing when it changes and communicating that.

Autism and Emotional Labour

I don’t have the energy or wording ability to comment much on this one right now.

(Though I can’t say I much like the number of rather different things which do tend to get lumped together under that label. As a more general issue, not specifically to do with this post. The executive function stuff really doesn’t fit under “emotional”.)

Anyway, I didn’t get far into it before something struck me pretty hard:

If you read the MetaFilter thread, you’ve probably already pictured this scenario. Let’s imagine an autistic man married to an NT woman. (Possibly a stereotype, but also the situation of many people IRL, including people I know, so let’s just run with it for now.)

The NT woman says, “My husband isn’t doing any emotional labour for me. He never knows what I’m thinking or feeling unless I tell him. If I tell him what to do, he’ll do it, but that doesn’t feel like enough. Just once, I want someone to notice I’ve had a bad day and know how to comfort me, without my having to say anything. When my husband doesn’t do that, I feel so invisible and lonely.”

The autistic man says, “I don’t understand how to make my wife happy. She wants me to guess what she is feeling, but I can’t read her facial expressions or body language, so I can’t guess! Why can’t she just tell me what she wants? I always do whatever she asks of me, and it kills me that this isn’t enough.

Neither partner in this scenario is wrong. Both are suffering because of unmet needs.

That is a fairly stereotypical scenario. But, some of the phrasing caught my attention.

I am so, so glad to be living with someone now who is NOT in the habit of deciding they know what I’m thinking and feeling better than I do, without bothering to consult me about it. Much less getting all pissy on the regular, based on assumptions about that from whatever cues they’re (often badly mis)reading. And giving that much more weight than what I do say about my own feelings.

(While I’m turning more hypervigilant all the time, trying to predict and anticipate what’s going on with them based on observation and pattern matching 😦)

Talk about some very different needs and expectations, yeah.

I probably react much more strongly to that pattern since I do associate it with low regard for boundaries, the other person being unwilling/unable to admit when they’re wrong, and actual abusive behavior. But, I doubt I would appreciate it much even without the additional baggage, and with everyone involved consistently acting in good faith.

Important to recognize when communication just isn’t working well for everyone involved, and try to come up with some solution that does work. It’s also important for everyone involved to try there, getting back to one major theme in that post.

Hadn’t thought about the “please do not assume you know what I’m thinking and feeling” in exactly those terms before, I don’t think. But, I was also thinking again earlier about some other needs not always getting met so well usually being a decent tradeoff for generally more respectful behavior. And just not regularly having to put up with a bunch of interference and sniping, which never would have passed for acceptable had it gone the other way.

This is definitely one example, to the point that it jumped out in a rather triggering way when I read this a while later.

ahollowyear:

sgramajo:

curlicuecal:

yamitamiko:

nientedal:

animatedamerican:

feminismandhappiness:

giandujakiss:

teapotsahoy:

survivablyso:

xparrot:

fluffmugger:

vmprsm:

darkseid:

freebismuth:

moonsandstarsandmagic:

vintagegalpal:

emilievitnux:

there-is-irony-everywhere:

jmenfoot:

scavengerridley:

Natalie Portman being confused by the fact that you have to say “hi” to someone before starting a conversation in France got me like ?????

“I feel there’s a lot of rules of politeness and codes of behavior there you have to follow. […] A friend of mine taught me that when you go in some place you have to say “bonjour” before you say anything else, then you have to wait two seconds before you say something else. So if you go into a store you can’t be like “do you have this in another size,” or they’ll think you’re super rude and then they’ll be rude to you.” [X]

#wait you don’t do this is other countries??

So that’s it guys. French are not rude, we just don’t like it when people don’t say “Hello” or “Hi” when they start a conversation. 

Don’t everyone say “Hi” before they ask something to someone? What’s next? Saying please is also a french thing or others countries does that too? 

Canada is similar. We say sorry and please. The Hello thing seems strange, but it actually makes sense.

Bro, this threw me for a loop when I moved up north. Like in the southern United States you say “Hi, how are you?” And then make a few seconds of small talk before you ask your question or order your food and when I went to Connecticut they were like “What do you want?” Without any hello or anything. In other places they just STARE at you waiting on you to place your order and gtfo.

I laid my hand over my chest the first time, and the only way to describe my look was “aghast” before I said “Good lord!” My husband said it’s the most southern thing he’s seen me do. He thought it was hilarious. But…. Like??? That’s rude as fuck??????? Don’t y’all say say “Hello” before throwing your demands at someone??

maybe this is why everyone thinks new yorkers are rude

this is absolutely why ppl think new englanders r rude. no one has any fucking manners

african culture, at least in ghana, demands you greet a person before you ask them something. if youre in an open market they may even ignore you if you dont.

We do this in Australia as well. If you just started straight off saying “yeah I want XXXX” we’d think you’re rude as all fuck.  You say hi, then make your request.  It’s basic acknowledgement of the other person as a person rather than some random request-filling machine.

Huh. Speaking as a New Englander, I usually go with “Excuse me,” but sometimes “hi” or “hey,” but with no pause – it’ll be, “Excuse me, hi, I was looking for X?” From my POV, it seems rude to get too chatty and waste some stranger’s time; I assume they have better things to do than make small talk with me, so I just get my request out there so they can answer me and get back to whatever needs doing. I always thank folks for their help afterwards, if that helps?

(The rules of etiquette are strange. People say New Englanders are rude and cold, but once during an unexpected snowstorm here in Seattle, my car got stuck and I was standing by the side of the road at a busy intersection in the snow for half an hour waiting for my housemate to come pick me up, and not a single person stopped. Back in Massachusetts, every other car on the road would’ve been pulling up to check to see if I was okay, if my phone was working, did I need a lift, etc.)

No but this was the first thing my cousin told me in France? you never ever ever start a conversation with anyone, not even like “Nice weather today, huh?” without saying Bonjour first. You HAVE to greet them or, just like Ghana, they’ll ignore the shit out of you, you rude little fucker

(And “excuse me” or “pardon me” doesn’t cut it. you still have to open with bonjour)

[and I can’t speak for New England but coming from Chicago and then moving Out West where the culture is VERY influenced by the South and DETERMINED to think of themselves as small town folk… I HATE when I have to make small talk before ordering food??? Like, if it’s a coffee shop that’s pretty much empty I’ll chit chat for a few seconds, but I’m still not going to make inane conversation about the weather unless the weather is extreme.

In a big city it is rude as fuck to waste my time making small talk with me when we are not even friends or neighbors??? I am here to get shit done. There are four other people in line behind me, and I don’t want to waste their time. I am here, I HAVE MY ORDER ALREADY DECIDED BY THE TIME I GET TO THE FRONT BECAUSE I AM NOT A CAVE WOMAN, and I am being polite by saying both Please and Thank You and not wasting other people’s daylight.]

I live in a small northern city, and I feel it would be rude to engage someone in more than maaaaaybe a sentence of small talk before placing my order. In addition to feeling I was wasting their time, I’d feel like I was demanding emotional labour (small-talk is emotional labour for *me*) that they weren’t being paid to give.

so bizarre.  New Yorker here.  Saying hi, how are you, etc before these kinds of commercial interactions is what’s rude to me – because ffs, there are people in line behind you, we have lives, move it along.  It’s really just a dramatic cultural difference – but borne of a real practical necessity.

Oh my god saying ‘hi’ takes less than A SINGLE SECOND YOU ARE NOT WASTING ANYBODY’S TIME

In Spain you have to say hello to people before you talk to them even people who work in retail deserve that bare minimum courtesy hello??

Transplanted New Yorker here, and the feeling here is: people who work in retail deserve the bare minimum courtesy you would afford anyone else, which is to not waste their time.  You maybe say a half-second “hi” and/or possibly “excuse me” to be sure you have their attention, then you get to the point as quickly and concisely as possible.  You don’t wait to get a “hi” back, you probably don’t ask “how are you”, you definitely don’t talk about the weather.  You smile and keep your tone of voice courteous-to-friendly, you say please, you thank them when you’re done, and you do. not. waste. their. time.

Except ”time” is really only shorthand for the concept:  you don’t intrude on their lives more than you have to.  NY is a very very crowded city which allows for very little personal space, so New Yorkers have developed a form of courtesy that involves minimizing our unavoidable intrusions on each other.  Which is why we hold doors without making eye contact, and why we tend to feel that in any interaction with a stranger, it’s actively rude to do anything but get to the point immediately.

Interesting discussion of regional differences in conversational convention.  But the amount of “my way is the right way; everyone else is super rude and also wrong” going on in this post is giving me hives.  

Hey.  Listen.  "Polite” and “rude” are relative concepts.  Something you were taught was rude may not be seen as rude elsewhere, and might even be the polite thing to do.  Conversely, something you might have been taught was polite might be seen as rude elsewhere.  Saying “no one has any manners” about a group of people whose culture and, by extension, whose conversational expectations work differently than yours is really arrogant. 

In the US the thumbs up means good job or great. In France and Germany it means one, they start counting with the thumb instead of the index finger. In Greece it’s an obscene sexual gesture.

This guy I knew in college worked with the campus d/Deaf/HoH group and told a story about the dinner they had to welcome everyone in. They were trying to tell this little old lady what one of the dishes was, something casserole I forget what kind, and she was getting really flustered. Finally they figured out they were speaking to her in ASL and she was from South Africa. The ASL sign for whatever it was (spinach maybe?) in South African Sign means sex. They were offering this little old lady a sex casserole.

There’s an Italian toast ‘chin chin’, mimicking the sound of the glasses clinking together. It becomes hilarious when Japanese folks are around since in Japanese chin means penis.

As for the South, I will bet you anything that how we have conversations at the register stemmed from the homestead days when a farmer would come in to town maybe once a month and this would be the only time they’d get to talk to someone they didn’t live with. I like talking with customers! If I can get them to smile then it’s a victory and I have a better day for it. It only becomes emotional labor if they’re an outright ass or are sexually harassing me. But in the big crammed city of New York it makes sense to take the get your shit and get out approach, people have a subway to catch. Out here I had to drive myself anyway since it’s fifteen minutes to the edge of town from where I live, so what does it matter if I spend an extra minute at the register?

It’s important to be aware of the differences and ultimately there’s a degree of ‘when in Rome’ that has to happen. Someone who moves from Greece to the US is going to be startled by the amount of thumbs up but ultimately they’re going to have to adjust. Someone from the US is probably going to be shocked that telling someone they did a good job was taken as an insult and they similarly are going to have to adjust. Mom’s a damn Yankee transplant and said it was weird moving to the South and having cashiers younger than her daughter call her dear, but that’s just what we do. Sweetheart, darling, honey, sugar, they don’t have overtly romantic/sexual connotations here. As long as there’s not a leer attached to it if a guy calls me ‘sugar’ when I’m at work it doesn’t parse as a flirt because it’s not one, it parses the same as if he called me ‘miss’. But when a busload of Californians came through it took me three people to realize that ‘baby’ was not flirting, it was just California.
NOTHING is universal.

This is the biggest place I’ve ever worked so it took some getting used to, like any skill, but even being socially awkward it’s easy to tell what scripts to follow. Test the waters, if they don’t respond then okay this is a move them through kind of person, be quick and efficient and to the point, feel good when they smile at ‘last question I promise, do you want your receipt’. If they do then pull out the five small talk scripts, get a smile, feel good when they laugh at the cat small talk script.

It’s also important to note that claiming your culture’s way of doing polite right is a fantastic way to fall into some really bigoted nonsense. In Puerto Rico the personal bubble is much smaller than in the US proper, like RIGHT at your elbow close. I had a cashier who was super uncomfortable because our steward was getting in her personal space constantly and he was pissed off because he was trying to HELP her with moving orders why is she mad at him? Once I sat them down and explained the difference they both had this aw shit moment because from their own standpoints they were being polite and from the others’ standpoints they were being rude. After that they were fine, when he got a little too close she’d say ‘whoa man my bubble’ and he’d laugh and shake is head and step back.

Lots of non-white cultures have things like that, particularly since white America has serious problems with sexualizing ANY physical contact to the point we’re all touch starved. The normal speaking voice is at a higher volume or it’s more acceptable to show your emotions or gesture when you speak. None of this is WRONG, but when people star getting into ‘my culture is the only right culture’ then guess who comes out on top? It ain’t the little guy.

One of my labmates was from Poland, and she had a tendency to come off as kind of abrupt and brusk, verging on mean. In particular, when she was providing feedback on a presentation or paper she could come across as SUPER cutting. Which was not her intention! From the way she would explain it, we had a running joke in the lab, “it sounds nicer in Polish.”

And this is actually true; there are scientific articles comparing the cultural contexts for communication! It’s really neat.

So in (most parts of) America, we equate indirectness with politeness. “Excuse me, would it be possible for you to perhaps pass me that salt, if you don’t mind?” The more roundabout you are, the more we consider that a signal of social courtesy.

In Poland, not only is indirectness viewed as rudely wasting the listener’s time, but directness is viewed as communicating intimacy and friendliness. “Give me the salt.”

…It sounds nicer in Polish. 🙂

Omg I love this

The Effects of Capital, Labor, and Class on Local Etiquette Across International Boundaries

A Very Solid Article That Brings Up Many Of My Own Points for Moving to AAC Use

failure-to-adult:

Seriously an awesome article about autistics who have some speech (hi!) preferring AAC over verbal speech. The author makes a lot of very good, very articulate points which are quite similar to my own (not exactly in some places, but very on the nose in others).

A Very Solid Article That Brings Up Many Of My Own Points for Moving to AAC Use

About rocking

realsocialskills:

Among other things: Rocking is body language. Rocking is emotions. 

There is a slow happy!rock. And an anxiety!rock. And anger. And affection. And any number of others. And they are not the same.

And it is possible to look and understand. It is possible to learn how to read rocking, to know what it’s showing.

This is body language. Meaning shown on a body.

They tell us that we do not have body language, that we have a flat affect. And then they try to make this true; they try to flatten us and stop us from moving and showing emotional body language.

But we aren’t flat. We have body language. And rocking is part of it. (And any number of other movements. Not just rocking. But rocking is on my mind.)

I can’t tell you how to read it. Not much. Not yet. I’m trying to figure out some of the words for that. It is hard to describe body language in words, even body language that is socially valued enough that a lot of people have tried. All the more so this.

What I can tell you is that autistic movement is meaningful. Not mysterious. Not ethereal. Not in-another-world. Meaningful, present, and possible to understand.

(Not simple. Communication between people is never simple, and never formulaic. Meaningful. Complicated.)

Keep that in mind. The first step to understanding is knowing that there is something to understand.

About speech abilities

iamthejohnwatson-a:

realsocialskills:

Some people can speak easily.

Some people always have difficulty speaking.

Some people never speak at all.

Some people can speak, but at a cost that’s not worth it.

Some people are better off communicating in other ways.

Some people speak sometimes, and type other times.

Some people have words all the time; some don’t.

Some people can speak fluidly, but only on certain topics. (Just like how one can be fluent in some topics in a foreign language, but be unable to read the news).

Some people lose speech at certain levels of stress.

Some people rely on hand movements and stimming in order to find words.

Some people have a monotone and convey tone through motion.

Some people make a lot of mistakes with words, and rely heavily on tone to make themselves understood.

Some people rely heavily on scripts, and only sound normal when they stay on-script.

Some people use phrases from television.

Some people communicate by repeating themselves, and tend to be perceived as not communicating.

Some people say a lot of words they don’t understand, and are perceived as having meant them.

Some people substitute one word for another a lot, and don’t always realize it.

Some people can answer questions even when they’re having trouble initiating speech.

Some people who find speech easy sound odd.

Some people who find speech difficult sound normal.

You don’t really know how someone communicates until you’ve communicated with them substantially, and even then, you only know in the context you’ve communicated in. Appearances can be deceiving. 

And it’s important to be aware that all of these things exist.

This made me cry. You have no idea how bad I needed this

tklswitch:

livelovelaughalot:

hotephoetips:

i treat people how i want to be treated until i notice a lack of reciprocity

then i begin to treat them how they treat me

and that’s when people usually notice that there’s a problem

“you acting different”

yeah

I gotta start doing this

This is great in theory, but doesn’t always work in real life.

Treating others the way you want to be treated is usually a good thing, as there are some things we all want (attention, recognition, respect, etc). However, there are certain things that one person might want or need, that the other not only doesn’t want, but can’t stand.

Example: My friend Jessica is a hugger. Giving and receiving hugs symbolizes affection for her. I, on the other hand, can’t stand being hugged. I don’t even like to be touched by most people.

Say she communicates to me that she loves me by giving me a hug. If I hug her back, but say nothing, she doesn’t know that I don’t like being hugged. Then, when I don’t ever engage her in a hug, she wonders why, and feels like I am not an affectionate person, or I don’t reciprocate her affection… When really, I’m very affectionate, but I show it in different ways. If I never communicate that to her, she doesn’t understand, and her feelings are hurt. Maybe she doesn’t communicate how she feels, either.

Resentment slowly grows as more situations arise where we are each expecting to receive the same treatment from each other that we are giving. A rift is created in our friendship that slowly pushes us apart. A situation that could easily have been avoided if we had expressed how we felt to begin with.

Tl;Dr: Don’t assume that other people want to be treated the way you want to be treated. Communication is EXTREMELY important. What works for one person may not work for another, and it may not even be something you would instinctively identify as a problem.