Tag: discrimination
HRC Publishes New Data Detailing How Unsafe Trans Teens Feel at School
Lobby group admits it illegally fired outed gay Brexit whistleblower
Rightwing pressure group the TaxPayers’ Alliance has admitted it illegally fired and vilified whistleblower Shahmir Sanni.
Sanni became the target of vitriol after he revealed the massive overspending by Vote Leave during the 2016 Brexit campaign. At the time, he was described as a ‘Walter Mitty fantasist’ by Matthew Elliot, head of Vote Leave, to the BBC. He was also targeted by Downing Street, who released a statement outing Sanni as gay. The whistleblower was then fired from running TaxPayers’ Alliance’s social media.
However, according to The Guardian, the alliance have now conceded they acted illegally. This makes them liable to pay substantial damages.
CLICK THE HEADER LINK TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE.
Lobby group admits it illegally fired outed gay Brexit whistleblower
The Isolation of Being Deaf in Prison
When I was in state prison in Georgia in 2013, I heard about a class called “Motivation for Change.” I think it had to do with changing your mindset. I’m not actually sure, though, because I was never able to take it. On the first day, the classroom was full, and the teacher was asking everybody’s name. When my turn came, I had to write my name on a piece of paper and give it to a guy to speak it for me. The teacher wrote me a message on a piece of paper: “Are you deaf?”
“Yes, I’m deaf,” I said.
Then she told me to leave the room. I waited outside for a few minutes, and the teacher came out and said, “Sorry, the class is not open to deaf individuals. Go back to the dorm.”
I was infuriated. I asked several other deaf guys in the prison about it, and they said the same thing happened to them. From that point forward, I started filing grievances. They kept denying them, of course. Every other class—the basic computer class, vocational training, a reentry program—I would get there, they would realize I was deaf, and they would kick me out. It felt like every time I asked for a service, they were like, fuck you, no you can’t have that. I was just asking for basic needs; I didn’t have a way to communicate. And they basically just flipped me the bird.
While I was in prison they had no American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters. None of the staff knew sign language, not the doctors or the nurses, the mental health department, the administration, the chaplain, the mail room. Nobody. In the barbershop, in the chow hall, I couldn’t communicate with the other inmates. When I was assaulted, I couldn’t use the phone to call the Prison Rape Elimination Act (a federal law meant to prevent sexual assault in prison) hotline to report what happened. And when they finally sent an interviewer, there was no interpreter. Pretty much everywhere I went, there was no access to ASL. Really, it was deprivation.
I met several other deaf people while I was incarcerated. But we were all in separate dorms. I would have liked to meet with them and sign and catch up. But I was isolated. They housed us sometimes with blind folks, which for me made communication impossible. They couldn’t see my signs or gestures, and I couldn’t hear them. They finally celled me with another deaf inmate for about a year. It was pretty great, to be able to communicate with someone. But then he got released, and they put me with another blind person.
When I met with the prison doctor, I explained that I needed a sign language interpreter during the appointment. They told me no, we’d have to write back and forth. The doctor asked me to read his lips. But when I encounter a new person, I can’t really read their lips. And I don’t have a high literacy level, so it’s pretty difficult for me to write in English. I mean, my language is ASL. That’s how I communicate on a daily basis. Because I had no way to explain what was going on, I stopped going to the doctor.
My health got worse. I came to find out later that I had cancer. When I went to the hospital to have it removed, the doctor did bring an interpreter and they explained everything in sign language. I didn’t understand, why couldn’t the prison have done that in the first place? When I got back to prison, I had a lot of questions about the medicines I was supposed to take. But I couldn’t ask anyone.
I did request mental health services. A counselor named Julie was very nice and tried her best to tell the warden I needed a sign language interpreter. The warden said no. They wanted to use one of the hearing inmates in the facility who used to be an interpreter because he grew up in a home with deaf parents. But Julie felt that was inappropriate, because of privacy concerns. Sometimes, we would try to use Video Remote Interpreting, but the screen often froze. So I was usually stuck having to write my feelings down on paper. I didn’t have time to process my emotions. I just couldn’t get it across. Writing all that down takes an exorbitant amount of time: I’d be in there for 30 minutes, and I didn’t have the time to write everything I wanted to. Julie wound up learning some sign language. But it just wasn’t enough.
My communication problems in prison caused a lot of issues with guards, too. One time, I was sleeping, and I didn’t see it was time to go to chow. I went to the guard and said, “Hey man, you never told me it was chow time.” I was writing back and forth to the guard, and he said he can’t write because it’s considered personal communication, and it was against prison policy for guards to have a personal relationship with inmates. That happened several times. I would have to be careful writing notes to officers, too, because it looked to the hearing inmates like I was snitching.
Once they brought me to disciplinary court, but they had me in shackles behind my back, so I had no way to communicate. Two of the corrections officers in the room were speaking to me. All I saw were lips moving. I saw laughter. One of the guards was actually a pretty nice guy, one of the ones who was willing to write things down for us deaf folks. He tried to get them to take the cuffs off me. He wrote, guilty or not guilty? But the others would not uncuff me. I wanted to write not guilty. I wanted to ask for an interpreter. But I couldn’t. They said, “OK, you have nothing to say? Guilty.” That infuriated me. I started to scream. That was really all that I could do. They sent me to the hole, and I cried endlessly. It’s hard to describe the fury and anger.
Prison is a dangerous place for everyone, but that’s especially true for deaf folks.
Jeremy Woody, 48, was released from Central State Prison in Georgia in August 2017, after serving four years for a probation violation. He now lives near Atlanta. He is currently suing Georgia corrections officials over his treatment in prison, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Disability Rights Program and the ACLU of Georgia. Woody spoke to The Marshall Project through an American Sign Language interpreter.
The Georgia Department of Corrections did not respond to a request for comment concerning allegations in this interview.
This is appalling on every level- I want to know, are prisoners not protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act? Does this treatment not constitute discrimination? I realize obviously that things that are discriminatory happen every day regardless of their legality, but this is so blatant that I have to wonder if there’s some legal mechanism that strips deaf prisoners of their rights the way felons are stripped of their voting rights.
The ADA absolutely applies to prisoners, and in fact I used to work for a law firm that advocates for prisoners, and we won a lawsuit in my state that said that this bullshit and other types of non-accommodation of the disabled were illegal. We eventually were given authority to monitor the prisons for compliance with the ADA because the corrections department repeatedly refused to comply voluntarily.
Unfortunately, because of apathy and antipathy at the legislative level, these rights only get enforced in the judiciary after someone or some interest group sued, and that takes years. In the mean time, disabled and sick prisoners suffer.
California Drops Bill Banning Anti-LGBTQ Conversion Therapy in Surprising Move
As the legislative session winds to a close for the year, Assembly Bill 2943 was removed from consideration on the final day of debate. Although California passed the nation’s first-ever bill outlawing conversion therapy in 2012, AB 2943 would have built on the previous legislation by expanding its scope.
In addition to preventing the harmful, discredited practice from being performed on individuals over the age of 18, it defined any attempt to “cure” the sexual orientation or gender identity of an LGBTQ person as “fraud.”
AB 2943 passed both the California Assembly and the Senate with wide majorities early in the year and was set to head to Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk following one final vote in the lower house of the legislature. Brown, a Democrat who has signed many pro-LGBTQ bills during his time in the governor’s mansion, was widely expected to approve it.
CLICK THE HEADER LINK TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE.
California Drops Bill Banning Anti-LGBTQ Conversion Therapy in Surprising Move
White people: the true victims of discrimination
I’ve seen these posts saying, in the words of one of them, “If your job requires you to go against your religious beliefs then perhaps it is time to change careers?” in reference to healthcare workers and government employees who want to deny services to lgbt ppl or others whom they condemn, and i just feel like those posts don’t attempt to understand internal logics at all
like, fundamentalist christian doctors don’t deny trans people medical care because they believe that somebody should provide the care but they just don’t want to be the one to do it. they deny the care because they don’t believe the person should receive care. Their refusal to provide care isn’t just “oops you’re in the wrong field,” as if they were a person with a peanut allergy working in a peanut factory. It is an intentional and calculated part of why they are in the field in the first place — to extend religious control and condemnation to the medical realm.
the pediatrician who spent an entire consultation telling one of my friends at 16 or 17 that he would go to hell if he kept choosing to be gay wasn’t just “not cut out for the job,” he was specifically in that job in order to do that particular thing. Kim Davis didn’t deny the gay couple a marriage license because she couldn’t personally do it, she denied them a marriage license because she thought that people like them should not get marriage licenses and that a clerk should deny them and by god she was going to be that clerk
Saying “if you can’t provide services then why are you in that job!!!” to fundamentalist christians almost always misses the point — that they are in that job specifically so they can selectively deny service
So many people have reblogged this with comments about how this isn’t a thing and how nobody goes into a field specifically to exclude people, and that people pick jobs based on what they like doing, just like most people select a career. And I see where they are coming from in some ways. My wording can be read as meaning that Kim Davis’s primary motivation for becoming a county clerk was specifically to deny gay couples marriage licenses, which isn’t exactly what I mean.
What I mean is that, for a specific subset of fundamentalist Christians, they will say “we need more Christian doctors” or “we need more Christians in government,” and what they mean (and what everybody in the community hears, particularly kids and young adults thinking towards careers) is “we need people in those positions who will discharge their duties according to a fundamentalist Christian ethic, and refuse to allow _______ to happen on their watch.” That “_______” can be filled with anything from abortion to trans acceptance to issuance of marriage licenses to gay people. Their epistemic framework is specifically fundamentalist Christian and not “professional,” and they should be recognized as such, not just people whose professional ethics are superseded in one or two places by their personal religious practice.
I’m guessing this also applies to doctors who are straight-up disablist.
I know there’s a problem with people going into medicine because it’s prestigious and they want the admiration, rather than having any concern for patients. That’s fairly well-acknowledged, culturally, though it could still be better.
But I wonder how many are in medicine because they hate not just sickness – which would be on shaky ground – but sick/disabled people.
Like they’re subliminating their urge to “clean up the town” into a very socially-accepted course of action.
And if they can’t fix you immediately – ie. make the problem not be a problem now – they’ll take the Other Route, of removing care so that you die as soon as possible.
All subconsciously, for most of them, but it would explain their actions very well.
Yeah I suspect it’s complicated. Meaning, sometimes absolutely, sometimes no, sometimes a combination, and sometimes even they probably don’t understand what the hell they’re doing or why. But there are definitely people who go into fields with positions of power because they want to do harm. Hell, we already know that there’s serial killers who prey on sick and disabled people by becoming doctors or nurses or LNAs on purpose to gain easier access to us. (Ever wonder why you never hear of them even though they’re some of the most successful and prolific, and there’s little to no outcry or fame even when they’re caught after doing shit that makes the most infamous serial killers look tame? …yeah.) That’s an extreme example, but if that exists (and is as widespread as it is), then every other gradation along the way in terms of malicious intent, both conscious and otherwise, has to exist as well.
I’ve seen these posts saying, in the words of one of them, “If your job requires you to go against your religious beliefs then perhaps it is time to change careers?” in reference to healthcare workers and government employees who want to deny services to lgbt ppl or others whom they condemn, and i just feel like those posts don’t attempt to understand internal logics at all
like, fundamentalist christian doctors don’t deny trans people medical care because they believe that somebody should provide the care but they just don’t want to be the one to do it. they deny the care because they don’t believe the person should receive care. Their refusal to provide care isn’t just “oops you’re in the wrong field,” as if they were a person with a peanut allergy working in a peanut factory. It is an intentional and calculated part of why they are in the field in the first place — to extend religious control and condemnation to the medical realm.
the pediatrician who spent an entire consultation telling one of my friends at 16 or 17 that he would go to hell if he kept choosing to be gay wasn’t just “not cut out for the job,” he was specifically in that job in order to do that particular thing. Kim Davis didn’t deny the gay couple a marriage license because she couldn’t personally do it, she denied them a marriage license because she thought that people like them should not get marriage licenses and that a clerk should deny them and by god she was going to be that clerk
Saying “if you can’t provide services then why are you in that job!!!” to fundamentalist christians almost always misses the point — that they are in that job specifically so they can selectively deny service
So many people have reblogged this with comments about how this isn’t a thing and how nobody goes into a field specifically to exclude people, and that people pick jobs based on what they like doing, just like most people select a career. And I see where they are coming from in some ways. My wording can be read as meaning that Kim Davis’s primary motivation for becoming a county clerk was specifically to deny gay couples marriage licenses, which isn’t exactly what I mean.
What I mean is that, for a specific subset of fundamentalist Christians, they will say “we need more Christian doctors” or “we need more Christians in government,” and what they mean (and what everybody in the community hears, particularly kids and young adults thinking towards careers) is “we need people in those positions who will discharge their duties according to a fundamentalist Christian ethic, and refuse to allow _______ to happen on their watch.” That “_______” can be filled with anything from abortion to trans acceptance to issuance of marriage licenses to gay people. Their epistemic framework is specifically fundamentalist Christian and not “professional,” and they should be recognized as such, not just people whose professional ethics are superseded in one or two places by their personal religious practice.
I’m guessing this also applies to doctors who are straight-up disablist.
I know there’s a problem with people going into medicine because it’s prestigious and they want the admiration, rather than having any concern for patients. That’s fairly well-acknowledged, culturally, though it could still be better.
But I wonder how many are in medicine because they hate not just sickness – which would be on shaky ground – but sick/disabled people.
Like they’re subliminating their urge to “clean up the town” into a very socially-accepted course of action.
And if they can’t fix you immediately – ie. make the problem not be a problem now – they’ll take the Other Route, of removing care so that you die as soon as possible.
All subconsciously, for most of them, but it would explain their actions very well.
You must be logged in to post a comment.