iinnii-antifa:

A few things about eugenics/sterilization in Canada from someone who knows too much about it for their own mental well being

(content warning for ableism, violence, misogyny and racism): 

– Involuntary/coercive sterilization was one part of a multifaceted strategy of eugenics that included restrictive marriage laws, immigration restrictions, and segregation of people considered unfit for public space in institutions. Canada is still chock full of these structures of power, so it comes as no surprise that involuntary/coercive sterilizations continue.

 – The biggest proponents of eugenics in its earliest form were political parties associated with “progressive” causes, including the “Famous Five” suffragettes and Tommy Douglas, who saw it as essential to preserving the integrity of the Canadian social safety net.

 – Sterilization without consent was perfectly legal in Canada for 44 years, mainly in the Western provinces of Alberta and British Columbia. In Alberta alone, under the Sexual Sterilization Act, of the total number of individuals sterilized, 64.7% were women, 49.8% were from rural communities, 40.6% were unemployed, 20.55% were characterized as housewives, 25.7% were Indigenous (a disproportionately high number considering Indigenous people made up only 3.4% of the total population in Alberta at the time), and 70.6% were under the age of 20. Most of the individuals who were sterilized were characterized at the time of being approved for sterilization as being “mentally unfit”, but a number of cases involved patients “recovering from retardation” after sterilization. 

– Eugenics emerged in the midst of a moral panic about sexual relationships between Indigenous women and white settler men, and exaggerated hysteria about Indigenous and “feeble minded” women engaging in sex trade work. 

– The Alberta Eugenics Board disbanded in 1972. Many of the people who served on the board are still alive. There is no record of them ever facing any professional consequences for what they did, even though the Alberta government and apologized to some of the victims after Leilani Muir’s lawsuit. This includes John M. MacEachran, who co-founded the Canadian Psychological Association and was co-founder of the department of Psychology and Philosophy Department at the University of Alberta. Until 2003, an award in his name was given out by U of A, “honoring his accomplishments”. 

I’m saying all this because the horrors of involuntary sterilization and colonialism are not an accident. They’re a part of Canada’s national fabric. They’re a part of what made Canada a state. And the fact that they continue today, long after the laws supporting them were formally struck down, should come as no surprise. 

buttons-beads-lace:

xenoqueer:

the9livesofamao replied to your post “thatautisticadhdfeel: preternatural-aura: thatautisticadhdfeel: …”

I appreciate this. How do we stick up for people with Downs Syndrome when it comes to their eugenic erasure? It’s this big nasty grey area that pits pro-choice against anti-eugenics, which inadvertently summons the anti-choicers to join the cause, despite the goals being different. The whole thing is so fucked up. What’s next to the table? Autism? Mental illness?

There are definitely already people campaigning for the eugenic elimination of fetuses with basically any condition identifiable in utero, and campaigning for diagnostics to get more diseases identifiable in utero such as autism.

Ultimately, I think the most effective way to campaign against eugenic abortions is to campaign against ableism in general. People seek to abort disabled fetuses because they believe that it’s impossible for someone with these conditions to lead a satisfying life, or potentially because caretaking for disabled babies and children is prohibitively expensive. 

Both of these underlying beliefs can be addressed by having more visibility of disabled spokespeople, more widespread accommodations for these conditions, and better support systems for both disabled people and our caretakers. 

As an example of what this type of campaigning against ableism can look like, I recommend ths video.

It’s a really, really simple message– the video sums it up with one text screen at the end: “People with Down syndrome can live a happy life.”

But it’s an effective answer to all the fears about “My child will never…” that expecting parents might have, and to the overarching assumption that life with disability isn’t worth living.

ahmiin:

baku:

for real though if they ever do find the ‘’’’’’’’’gay gene’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ pls can straight allies claim to be gay and baffle the scientists because they cant find a gay gene within them and therefor we can undo the notion that the gay gene exists

because we all know the only reason why they want to find the ‘’’’’’’’gay gene’’’’’’ is because they want to

  • find out before birth which babies are gay so their parents can abort them/give them up for adoption based on that
  • try to forcibly remove the gay gene from those children when they’re born because being gay is still seen as something bad 
  • make homosexuality go right back to being classed as a disease that needs to be ‘fixed’

literally no good can come from ‘’’’’’the gay gene’’’’’’ being found

Replace every instance of “gay/homosexual” with “autistic/autism” and you’ve got Autism $peaks’ end goal.

Anyone trying to discover the gene for [insert anything here] is gonna fuckin skyrocket us into the Eugenics War from star trek and kill us all.

dagwolf:

queerqueerspawn:

socialistexan:

socialistexan:

The Resistance

Like, seriously, a “moderate” writer penning articles in the New Yorker about needing to end “demographic replacement” is exactly what I expected from The Resistance when it welcomed in “Never Trump” Conservatives.

Y’all realize he’s been advocating eugenics for two decades, right? Fucking under the gulag.

Sources for all of y’all cynics: x x x x x

Yep. Routine Sullivan.