Tag: nsfw art

hrefnatheravenqueen:

hrefnatheravenqueen:

hrefnatheravenqueen:

bowiebarbie:

inediblemadness:

tinyhousedarling:

musingsofanawkwardblackgirl:

wes-eskimo:

Venus, bussin that pussy open since the renaissance

BUST IT WIDE OPEN GIRL

Let us appreciate that this is made of marble! I couldn’t make that out of clay.

I see tiny lil dicks all over the place but this is the first time I have ever seen a statue figure with a vagina. I need more of this in my life

i have NEVER seen a statue with an actual vagina. the most i’ve seen is your standard nude woman statue with her legs clamped shut. this is boss.

That’s the vulva, not the vagina, though. Also this is not from the renaissance.

I’m reblogging this again because art – not Renaissance art but still art.

NO WAIT I’LL REBLOG THIS AGAIN BECAUSE PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET TO CREDIT THE ARTIST – WHO’S VERY MUCH ALIVE, AND SHE LIVES IN CALIFORNIA.
This piece isn’t depicting VENUS by the way, it’s depicting a contortionist, and this is a nude study. The piece is simply called “Swan”.
The artist is Jami Young. She’s proud to fly the colours of the Pride flag on her website alongside her own art.
Her website is at http://www.jyoung-studio.com .

Her Etsy page is at https://www.etsy.com/ca/shop/VolupticArt . 

transgirlkyloren:

shedoesnotcomprehend:

prokopetz:

dbundles42:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen several posts going around about obvious furry porn getting put up in high-class art museums, where the general thrust is all “ha ha, those ivory tower snobs don’t even realise they’re putting furry porn in their art galleries, because they’re not Internet Savvy like we are!”

Let’s leave aside for the moment the question of whether this is a reasonable conclusion to draw, and assume for the sake of argument that art museums are, indeed, being bamboozled into putting weird fetish porn on their walls due to lack of cultural context on the part of their curators.

Now, take a step back and consider: what are the odds that this is the first period in history where these sorts of shenanigans have occurred?

Indeed, what confidence do we have that it hasn’t been happening constantly throughout the history of Western art?

How many of the respected works of eras past that we genuflect over every day are, in fact, weird fetish porn that we ourselves lack the cultural context to correctly identify as such?

…are you kinkshaming the Mona Lisa?…

I am absolutely kinkshaming the Mona Lisa.

I’m not at all convinced that we even have to posit weird fetish porn that we lack the ability to identify.

(Cut for image heavy, and also for, uh, weird classic fetish porn art (did those adjectives go in the right order?))

Keep reading

wait wasn’t it generally agreed that St. Sebastian pictures are a Historical Kinky Gay thing? did I just hallucinate this artistic consensus