bittersnurr:

a-rinna:

fierceawakening:

maid-of-timey-wimey:

chelonianmobile:

tumblr user 1: i have issues identifying my gender and orientation due to borderline personality disorder

tumblr user 2: fair enough

tumbr user 1: which is why i am BORDERLINEGENDER and BORDERLINESEXUAL because my gender and sexuality can change and are determined by a mental illness

tumblr user 2: wait no that’s not how it works

tumblr user 2: that belief is actually very harmful to the lgbtaq community and also delegitimises the struggle of living with bpd

tumblr user 1: Y DO U HATE NEURODIVERGENT TRANS PPL

So it seems clear from context that OP is against neurogenders, but this post doesn’t actually make me any more sympathetic to User 2. User 1 never implied that all lgbtaq orientations and genders are caused/influenced by mental illness, they just said their own were. And how are they “delegitimizing” THEIR OWN illness?

Yeah. Like… I haven’t heard this with BPD, but I do hear it fairly often from autistic people. And it seems there actually are a lot of autistic trans people. So if someone wants to say “I think my self-conception of my gender is influenced by the way my neurology works,” okay. “Autismgender” seems like a usable abbreviation, even.

If you want me to use neopronouns, I’ll probably ask if they/them is acceptable to you, but aside from that I’m not sure why that would be objectionable?

I mean, the old-school “we think this is what the science says but we’re not totally sure” understanding was that prenatal hormones can influence (but not wholly dictate) gender identity and sexual orientation, and if that’s possible/likely, why couldn’t neurological differences do so too?

Yeah, I don’t ID as either borderlinegender or borderlinesexual but I do have BPD and I completely understand why other people with BPD would ID with these terms just from my own experience in questioning my sexuality, because my BPD absolutely impacts that to a significant degree.

I don’t think being borderline on its own has directly caused me to be queer, it’s not the only factor involved, but it definitely influences my sexuality and my ability to feel sexual and romantic attraction and the degree/frequency to which I feel them to the point that it has made it pretty damn difficult for me to figure out just what terms apply to my orientation. 

A major reason I primarily ID as queer is because of this, even, because if not for ‘queer’ I’d be spending all my time explaining “well I’m technically bi but also kinda grey-aro/grey-ace because my mental illness makes the way I experience attraction fluctuate from one day/hour/minute to another and for every stretch of time I’m sure I’m attracted equally to people of all genders, I’m totally devoid of attraction for another stretch of time and….” — and yeah, I’m not doing that. I’m tired just typing it out.

So I get 100% why someone with BPD would need a specific term to describe that their BPD is a major influence on how they experience either their gender or orientation or both. It’s a valid way to feel and it’s not an uncommon experience, either (there are people in various bpd tags who post about questioning because their bpd makes things so confusing pretty much every week), and I don’t think it delegitimizes the LGBTQiA+ community or other people with BPD at all.

I think it is mostly a problem where people think you shouldn’t even count as anything but cishet because you might have been cishet if you were neurotypical. It basically results in a subtle “you are not allowed to choose your identity because your perceptions are off”.

And this is extra miserable because idk about other disabled people but I CANNOT PASS as my damn asab because I cannot “preform” femininity correctly. So basically you get outgrouped by you assigned gender then try and find spaces for whatever gender you are and then get told you are failing at THAT for being disabled.

If disabled people ID as trans because they are disabled then that to some people, seems to imply that all transpeople are broken and should be forced to go to conversion therapy…. but I have literally been advised to have conversion therapy by lgbtq people because THEY are fine and normal but I AM broken i guess. Like I have read articles about transgender autistics killing themselves because they were told by gender clinics they couldn’t transition until their autism was CURED. In other words NEVER.

And this doesn’t even get into the fact this also applies to sexuality. Having any sort of baggage is often considered abusive. People will frequently tell people they aren’t allowed to date until they “recover” and I bought into that as a kid but 10 years later and I am now WORSE because of isolation. It doesn’t matter what your sexuality is either. You’d think that you would at least be allowed to be asexual but nope, being anything but straight when disabled is endorsing the “broken” narrative. Every other group will try and force you into the ace box but the ace community also hates you so even if you ARE ace you have no support.

But you know it’s not ableism or anything you’re just trying to sneek into spaces to ruin things for the REAL LGBTQ people.

novafuzzcheeks:

pervocracy:

While I’m at it, I’m really not happy with the way Tumblr is restoring “the innocence of youth” culture to 1990s-purity-ring levels.

It’s somehow transmuted a few good principles–adults shouldn’t have sex with underage people, underage people shouldn’t take part in porn, very young children shouldn’t be exposed to explicit sexuality–into bullshit like:

– All fiction involving underage sexuality, even non-sensationalized written descriptions of the kind of sexual relationships teenagers often have with each other, is child porn

– Sex education that talks about dealing with STIs and pregnancy and rape is okay, but teaching teenagers about sexual pleasure is gross and anyone who does it is probably a pedophile

– People under 18 all find sexuality frightening or offputting and don’t want to be exposed to it (I’m sure some feel that way, but if you think this is a universal or majority thing, wow, you must’ve gone to a very different high school than I did)

– Even acknowledging the existence of underage sexuality is suspicious, why would you be talking about this if you weren’t some kind of pedophile

It’s tough to talk about this because it immediately puts you in the company of people who really are being creepy about it, but I think it’s important to push back against these things.  Young people have sexualities, they aren’t “innocent” and many of them don’t want to be, and it is possible to acknowledge these facts without exploiting them.

My introduction to sex was finding a porn tape at age 11 in the vcr. That is NOT how you want kids to learn about sex. We really need comprehensive sex education for kids and teens, and to be realistic about human sexuality. We need to teach that it’s alright to have a sex drive, and it’s alright to not want sex. We need to teach how to be safe and happy if they DO want sex, so they don’t do shit that will traumatize them well into their late 20′s. I desperately wish someone would have REALLY taught me about sex, healthy, safe, happy sex, when I was young. Because all my education from 11-16 came from porn, and I was hypersexual as fuck and made a lot of bad decisions because I had nothing to go off of. Please stop pretending all teens aren’t sexual and start being realistic. 

moranion:

saxifraga-x-urbium:

closet-keys:

my genuine advice to younger-than-me wlw & questioning women about sex: it’s supposed to feel good. if it doesn’t, you shouldn’t have to do it. if you don’t enjoy something, you’re allowed to not like it. no matter what it is. even stuff that our culture says is essential to sex. you’re allowed to not like pain or crude language when you have sex, you are allowed to not like penetration, you’re allowed to not like oral or anal, you’re allowed to straight up not like being touched (being a stone top is okay!!!), you’re allowed to like things that most straight people don’t even consider sex but feel good, you’re allowed to like things that most cis people don’t even consider sex but feel good, you’re allowed to have preferences and enjoy sex and decide against sex that doesn’t feel safe and good. there is so much pressure to feel like you should like certain things, and I want you to know that it’s important to find out what you actually do like, not just what you feel like you’re supposed to like. you’re the one living in your body, and you get to decide what feels pleasurable 

#

good advice for everyone tbh (via @dingo-inna-domino-mask)

“you’re the one living in your body, and you get to decide what feels pleasurable”

angry-old-asian-man:

allyonthego:

I keep seeing these posts about how sad or upsetting it is to see CHILDREN who identify as ace. So this is a friendly reminder to all my ace minors who may need to hear it today.

1. You are NOT sad, and no one has a right to be upset by your identity.
2. You do not need to explain, to an adult person or anyone else, what you consider sexual attraction, or why you think you are not experiencing it. No one has the right to ask you to question your own identity.
3. You do not need to listen to anyone trying to convince you you are probably more gay or more straight, or anyone trying to change the way you identify in any other way.
4. Asexuality is not about whether you have had or are having sex. If you self-identify as asexual, that is not you sexualizing yourself, and you are not harming yourself by taking on a label that MIGHT change in the future. and don’t ever let anyone convince you otherwise. 
5. You are not required to keep an open mind that your orientation may change. It MIGHT change, and if it does, i hope you can welcome and enjoy whatever you are feeling when it arrives. But you aren’t required to participate in the rituals of dating, crushes, or experimenting just to prove that it’s really NOT what you want. 

I am a firm believer in self-exploration, and obtaining self-knowledge through questioning what we know about ourselves, and the world. But the way ace kids are constantly expected to provide answers for how we are the way we are, and what it means, and how we’re really really open to being something else, is just disgusting. It does more to turn kids AWAY from relabeling or reexamining themselves.

If you’re a minor, and you ID as ace, then you’re ace. You’re not broken, or alone, you’re not wrong, and you don’t need to answer for it.

Actually if anything, the adults are sexualising you for being so meddly with what you do with your own junk.

oldshrewsburyian:

viatorix:

LOUDER FOR THE HISTORIANS IN THE BACK, MR SCHULTZ

James A. Schultz, 2006, ‘Heterosexuality as a Threat to Medieval Studies,’ Journal of the History of Sexuality, 15, 1, pp.14-29

Good stuff. If people are looking for more work on sex and sexuality in the Middle Ages, I have recommendations:

Helmut Puff, “Same-Sex Possibilities,” in The Oxford Handbook of Women and Gender in the Middle Ages, with good bibliography

Ruth Mazo Karras, Sexuality in the Middle Ages: Doing Unto Others.

Schultz himself wrote a book called Courtly Love, the Love of Courtliness, and the History of Sexuality, which argues (to the best of my recollection) that medieval European courtly literature has models of beauty and desirability that do not reference sexual dimorphism. As a historian, I’m a skeptical of how far he pushes his point, but it’s an interesting work.

Also, a general work on history by a medievalist: Judith Bennett, History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism (it’s as great as it sounds)

FWIW, I spent most of the decade since Schultz’s article was published in grad school (and, relatedly, at national/international conferences) and never have I ever heard a medievalist try to impose heterosexuality on medieval figures. Results may vary based on departments and sub-disciplines, of course. Also FWIW, Frantzen published a raging anti-feminist screed a while ago, provoking upheaval and pushback throughout medieval studies internationally… and an ongoing conversation. 

thoughts while driving home from work

moncarnetdenote:

autismserenity:

thegentlewomon:

acephobia-is-real:

mylittlscorpion:

garet-the-3rd:

autismserenity:

sirigorn:

autismserenity:

life-of-a-cherry-blossom:

autismserenity:

If you think of asexual as “not having a sex drive,” then you’d probably be surprised to learn that aces used to be a part of the bi community.

But if you think of it as “not having a sexual orientation,” then it might suddenly become clear.

Because in a world where so many people only ever think of, or mention, “gay or straight” as possible orientations, there’s not that much difference between “not having a sexual orientation” and “not being either gay or straight.”

When the question is only framed as “which of these opposite points does your arrow point to,” I don’t feel like there’s a huge difference between your answer being “point???????” or “arrow???????”

Ohhh, everything makes sense now (says the bi ace)

SWEEET

Which is I think why a lot of aces identify as bi or pan at some point in their lives before landing on “asexual.” If you know you’re not gay or straight, there’s much more awareness of bisexuality than of asexuality, so it makes sense that people would end up there by default. 

Yes! And if you were coming out 20 oror more years ago, there was basically zero awareness of any other things.

this perfectly describes my late teens, most of which I spent convinced I was bisexual because I was equally attracted to men and women. Thing is, I actually wasn’t attracted to either, and I thought that that weird uncomfortable feeling I got each time something was overly sexualized was because I wasn’t used to feeling lust and/or arousal, and those new urges were making me uncomfortable, instead of just being plain uncomfortable with sexualization. I didn’t even know that asexuality was a thing until I read about it in a fanfic a year ago.

Chiming in as another aro/ace person who identified as bi for a couple years before realizing the ace spectrum existed. The poster right above me pretty much describes exactly my thought process. Basically, it went:

I’m not gay, and I’m definitely not straight, so I must be bi, because I find people of many different genders attractive (notice i say find attractive, not attracted to). I chalked my icky-squirmy feelings when thinking about sex and to a lesser extent relationships up to lack of experience as I’ve never been in a relationship or even been on a date.

But then in the past year or two I finally learned about asexuality and one night I had this huge emotional revelation when things just clicked suddenly.

So yeah, until recently, bi is where i fit best, and where i felt most accepted.

Up until now I thought “ace ppl were bi/pan?? that makes no sense????’

But reading this I remember–I thought I was bi/pan too!! When I was in high school, I thought I was romantically attracted to men nd sexually attracted to women (I knew almost nothing about gender). I didn’t know about split-attraction so I was horrified of being some kind of freak and doomed to be alone and/or unhappy, to say the least.

People get all offended and insulted and furious about how aces identified as bi/pan, but you need to understand: I only did so because I didn’t know/think asexuality was an option. I wasn’t gay, I wasn’t straight. What else could I be?

At 15, when I was just starting to use the internet to learn about sexuality I came across this: “Bisexuality is the ability to reach down someone’s pants and not care about whatever you find.” And that was, I thought, the closest thing I could find about how I felt.

You might be thinking, “But this is such a wild contradiction to what asexuality is! How could you possibly be bi/pan?” In my experience at least, the logic was something like, “Being bi/pan is an attraction to all genders, but I don’t experience attraction to two+/any gender. Which is similar in that I’m equally indifferent to multiple/all genders. They cancel out, or something? I’m romantically attracted to men, sexually to women, they cancel out?”

When you don’t know what asexuality is, you’re going to come to some conclusions that may make no sense at all to someone else. And they might not make sense to you, either. But what choice do you have? You have to be SOMETHING, or so we’re taught.

And then once I realized I wasn’t REALLY bi or pan, I chose not to identify as anything, since no labels fit me. I thought it would be freeing, not having to worry about labels. But god, it was so lonely. Here I was, some kind of anolomy, brimming with so many questions and no answers. And this is why asexuality is an orientation, rather than a lack of a sexuality. Ahaha, high school was misery in terms of finding my sexuality.

I don’t know, does this make sense to anyone? It’s hard to explain, at least for me.

“I’m nothing” eventually became a common response for me as well.

and gee, I wonder if the feeling of “I’m nothing” contributes to the higher rates of suicidality for a-spec people, like bi erasure does for bi people

for that matter, I wonder if the double whammy of “what I am doesn’t exist” and “what I think I am doesn’t exist”, of bi erasure and the even worse ace erasure, does too

and by “I wonder if” I mean “I bet that….”

I relate so fucking much about everything said in this post. I also identified shortly as bi, then pan, before landing on the “nothing” phase, that made me feel like such a worthless human being. Finding out about asexuality was both a terrifying and liberating experience. It was hard at first coming to terms with it for me, but when it did happen there was this humongous feeling of relief, that I was normal

So when I first found out that asexuality was a part of the bisexual community before splitting up, it made a whole lot of sense already to me. It was pretty logical.

saxifraga-x-urbium:

socialistgay:

socialistgay:

One of the worse aspects of tumblr discourse is the separation of gayness from innate gender nonconformity

Gay people have a long and weird historical relationship with gender that’s been completely wiped away with identity politics

The assumption that any deviation from cis-ness is trans-ness is separating gay people from a historical relationship that gay culture grew around.

This isn’t to say that us cis lgb people aren’t cis/don’t have cis privilege because that’s not true.

What I’m saying is that the history is more complicated than that and attempting to remove an important aspect of gayness from gay people is dangerous for gay youth especially because our connections to our history are so thin at the tail end of the AIDS crisis.

This is OK to rb

Gender crits fuck off

(i mean this is why it’s so fucking hard to find record of trans people in history, historically sexuality and gender identity were so tightly-bound to heterosexual norms of expression – ie femininity in gay men and masculinity in gay women – that it’s hard to say with any degree of certainty whether someone who claims they were a “man’s soul in a woman’s body” means “trans and straight” or “gay woman trying to explain her attractions in the language of the time”, innit)