Pawpaws!

plantyhamchuk:

It’s been awhile since I’ve talked about these, but it’s pawpaw season!

This is the fruit of a pawpaw tree – Asimina triloba – a wonderful fruit tree native to the eastern US / Appalachia. Many people have never heard of it, let alone tried it, because the fruits don’t last and they don’t ship worth a damn. They get bruised SUPER easily. It’s kind of like an illicit substance, people get the fruits, because they know someone, who knows of a place to get harvest them.

These came from an old employee of the plant nursery, who gave them to a still-current coworker, who shared them with everyone. In the second picture, I chomped into the fruit so you could see what it looks like inside before I devoured it.

Pawpaws taste like a cross between a mango and a banana. There’s a smoky aftertaste. It’s a complex flavor.

The trees can be tricky to grow, and there’s a huge difference from seedling to seedling, tree to tree. They are full of seeds, which I saved for V. I took the second one home to V, who shared it with some family friends who’d never tried it either. 

We figured out pretty quickly how to germinate these from seed, at around a 90% success rate (one year we had a 100% success rate) – which is kind of unheard of. However, our plants struggled horribly as we experimented with where they’d be happiest. I told V they were naturally found near rivers and sure enough, our most successful plants are down by the river. They want a shallow water table. Now that we’ve figured out the germinating and what they actually want once they’re germinated, I expect we’ll have quite a few more trees in the future.

Word is that some of the farmers in neighboring counties are catching onto the pawpaw demand, and are starting to plant it too. 

Technically, the fruit produces a neurotoxin, though not really in quantities thought to hurt anyone. There are breeding programs to try to breed that out though.

myceliorum:

bigmouthlass:

systlin:

resting-dick-face:

whiteyfu:

WOW this took me back. 

For the Siege Of Too Many Frames, I was there. I crawled through the webrings of new pages long neglected, of text made unreadable by too busy backgrounds. Lost in a Roman wilderness of Geocities fansites. When FF.net turned itself into Bring Back The Porn, I walked with the masses to Livejournal, watched MySpace flame and burn to ashes.

BBSes & whether they had Usenet feeds, 300 vs 1200 vs 2400 bps modems, tape drives, computers that ran on floppies alone, downloading one tiny file for 24 hours, having to know BASIC to work your computer, holy crap it’s weird that any computer at all can seem old-fashioned.

ihavenotyetfiguredoutanything:

proctain:

siryouarebeingmocked:

alaija:

cisnowflake:

denied-par-vollen:

cisnowflake:

strict-constitutionalist:

ar-gangbang:

Beyond parody.

No way.

Yanks claim that knife crime will just replace gun crime if guns are banned, but then mock the UK for trying to restrict knives as well. When will they admit they just have a dangerous obsession with weapons?

I think you’re missing the point. If you heavily restrict guns and people just move to knives, as they have in London, what do you think happens when you heavily restrict knives? You can infringe on peoples freedoms as much as you’d like but it wont make them any less violent.

If you don’t see the problem with making it harder for people to get a basic kitchen utensil because it could be used to hurt others I don’t know what to tell you. What’s next? Hammers? Baseball bats? Motor vehicles? Mag lights? Razors? Pointy sticks? Rocks? The list could go on forever. You could coat everything the the whole of the UK in Nerf foam and people would still beat each other to to death with their bear hands. Maybe it’s better to address what motivates people to act violently rather than banning any and every potential tool they could use to enact that violence?

You may want to look up Australia’s One Punch laws @denied-par-vollen

The way our laws work not only are there prohibited weapons, but anything that could be used as a weapon becomes illegal if they can show you have it for that purpose.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/judge-calls-for-5-levy-on-kitchen-knives-to-reduce-teen-stabbings-a3900136.html

>Judge Madge has already proposed grinding down the sharp point of knives, and now believes a tax would help combat the stabbing epidemic he dubbed a “public health emergency”. 

> (…) Judge Madge said eight or 10-inch knives with a pointed blade — which a butcher, fishmonger, or chef may occasionally but “rarely” use — are the weapons that can cause the most damage. He added: “Why can’t all those with any role — manufacturers, shops, police, local authorities, the Government — act together to reduce the sale of long pointed knives and provide an alternative of knives with rounded ends? 

It’s…it’s actually worse than the headline.

Keep in mind, you already have to be 18 to buy a knife in the UK.

Even butter knives because they are a kind of knife

London man, having his arm hacked off with a meat cleaver: wow I’m sure glad it’s not a pointy knife

Not to mention some pointy object alternatives!

Gang members know there are advantages in using acid to hurt someone rather than a knife because “the charges are more serious if you are caught with a knife and the tariff for prison sentences are much higher”.

Dr Harding added that “acid is likely to attract a ‘GBH with intent’ charge while using a knife is more likely to lead to the attacker being charged with attempted murder”

(And no, further restricting access to common cleaning products seems unlikely to address any of the root problems here, any more than placing age restrictions on scissors and paring knives has done so far.)

With one reblog from earlier getting more notes, I couldn’t help but think about how I still keep getting surprised at some pretty big differences in perspective.

Also reminded again of this one guy I knew when I was in high school and college, and really hoping things have gotten easier there.

Buck was personally a pretty committed vegetarian–and also hunting buddies with a friend’s partner. While he was living mostly off potatoes, peanut butter, and whatever he could grow? He was also hunting and fishing (besides doing most of the gardening) for his family, with both his parents the “broken down by shitty jobs” kind of disabled by that point.

Not always hunting in season, either, BTW. Partly because they were some of the only people I knew without electricity a lot of the time. So, they couldn’t easily just freeze his limit of deer for the rest of the year like most other people relying heavily on hunting.

They were struggling about the hardest of anybody I’ve known, and that’s saying something. Hopefully at least one of his parents eventually got approved for disability benefits, but they were pretty much stuck in limbo at that point. I don’t remember if Buck was the only or just the oldest kid, but he was pretty much keeping the family going in his late teens/early 20s. Not at all a good situation, but he stepped up to a point that nobody should have ever needed to.

Anyway, I had to think about that again. And also some of the likely reactions from people who just have no frame of reference to get basically any of it.

Back around to the multiple kinds of segregation in the US encouraging that. Plus, of course, widgets.

kaieffingleng:

philosophy-and-coffee:

apparentlyeverything:

boxingcleverrr:

aztechnology:

kelssiel:

systlin:

shitrichcollegekidssay:

them: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST MEANS HUMANS MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT AND COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT

biologist:

image

Like literally the only reason we didn’t go extinct is because we are aggressively social creatures who community organized and helped each other when faced with disasters that drove other species over the brink. 

 (Like we’re so aggressively social that we looked at APEX PREDATORS and went ‘they look soft! Friend????’)

(The answer was yes because wolves are also aggressively social and they adopted the strange tall not-wolves just as eagerly.)

humans @ wolves: holy shit these things are so cute i wonder if they’ll let us pet them?

wolves @ humans: holy shit these things are so cute i wonder if they’ll pet us?

Just in case people want source, here you go: humans are compelled to help each other in disaster situation, humans feel an innate urge to help others. We will help strangers too, not just family, and it has been tested. 

Also we’ve always taken care of our elderly and disabled. When life was literally “hunt and gather every day to live”, we saw value in taking care of those with disabilities. 

reblog to make a libertarian mad

Humans: Collecting grain in any one area causes pests to follow soon after, and we’re not good enough at hunting them to save our grain. There’s no way this agriculture is sustainable!

Cats: We can take care of that.

Humans: At what price?

Cats: …pet us.

‘fittest’ just means ‘best at filling the particular niche that is helping people survive right now in your particular area’ and it is SUPER WEIRD to me that somehow this gets interpreted as ‘being a selfish jackass’ when cooperation is generally about 1000% more effective in any situation that doesn’t involve tight spaces

dantes-infernal-chili:

swarnpert:

birdfriender:

I love that one of the restrictions on name changes in the UK is that your name cannot “promote criminal activities” and fucking hell every name I can think of that violates that is just stellar honestly like fucking hello nice to meet you my name is Commit Arson, I’d like you to meet my daughter Dont Pay Taxes and my son Steal From Work

this is my son, rob

Bank teller: in order to confirm [beaurocratic bullshit] we need to know your full legal name.

Me: I’m Robin DeBank

rawboney:

twistedingenue:

artem-ace:

There’s this guy that sits in front of me who you would think is a conservative redneck bc his entire aesthetic is southern lumberjack w boots and denim and hats but he’s actually one of the most inclusive and anti trump guy I’ve ever met and today he wore this hat that sums up his entire personality and I’m screaming.

Don’t judge a book by its cover; make cornbread, not war.

Hey, this is the  motto of the Southern Foodways Alliance, and among other things, they have an AMAZING podcast called Gravy, which ‘shares stories of the changing American South through the foods we eat’.

You  like this hat. Listen to that podcast. You’ll be happy.

Y’all need to stop being surprised by the radicalism in The South. The idea that Southerners are inherently more backwards is steeped in classism and ableism and erases all the awesome work marginalized folks are doing out there