lord-armitage:

ikaricrossinglines:

class-struggle-anarchism:

dagwolf:

latessitrice:

politicalsci:

image
image
image
image
image
image

Other tower blocks nearby are in need of ‘refurbishment’. Watch this fire be used an excuse to tear them down and gentrify the area instead with platitudes made about ‘affordable housing’ being included in new developments. Watch the working class be forced out of the area like the council wanted all along.

Capitalism. Private Property. Landlords. Policing. All working as designed.

‘I feel like the government are trying to kill us to force us out’

BBC lady: ‘ umm don’t say a bad word, you’ll offend people’

what’s offensive? what’s fuckin offensive

the BBC being as impartial as ever, this time by arguing against the opinions of a local resident about their own thoughts on a long standing push to destroy their home and drive them out. 

Do not let their voices fall on deaf ears, spread their words and let the truth be known.

one of the reason the block burnt so intensely and rapidly is believed to be the outside plastic covering which was put on so the building won’t be an eyesore for the rich neighbours. 

It’s no wonder he thinks it might not be an accident, for the way working class people in Britain are treated it may as well have been intentional even if the fire instead as accidental. 

Why is its neck so long?

the-awkward-turt:

For catching fish! (or other prey items)

There’s a whole group of turtles that fold their necks into their shells sideways rather than pulling them straight back (called sidenecks). Several of them have very long necks that they can fold back into their shell and then shoot out to grab passing prey. Snakeneck turtles have truly impressive neck reaches.

image

“Don’t mind me, Mr. Fish, I just have a short little neck I definitely couldn’t reach all the way over…”

image

“JUST KIDDING YES I CAN”

image

They have such cute creepy little faces. If they didn’t all get so big I would love to have one (puts another turtle on my Someday list).

The other trouble is that snakenecks can sometimes be a bit nippy and since their necks are long enough to reach all the way to the back of their shell NOWHERE IS SAFE.

Image sources (X) (X) (X)

“But I can’t have an eating disorder BECAUSE…”

twentyonelizards:

“I eat too much!”
There is no maximum calorie limit for eating disorders. An eating disorder is not about what you eat, but how you eat- your feelings/thoughts about your body and your intake.

“I’m not underweight!”
The majority of people who develop an eating disorder will never become underweight. The only disorder that is diagnosed based partially on weight is anorexia- and for that, if you’re an average weight but meet every other criteria, you’ll still be diagnosed with ‘atypical anorexia nervosa’. It doesn’t mean you aren’t sick or that you don’t need help.

“I don’t meet the anorexia/bulimia guidelines!”
OSFED (formerly known as EDNOS) is not a ‘failed’ eating disorder. It is every bit as serious as anorexia or bulimia. It is also the most commonly diagnosed eating disorder, meaning more people have this than anorexia or bulimia.

“I don’t make myself sick!”
Vomiting is only one form of purging. You can have bulimia, anorexia or OSFED/ARFID and not make yourself sick.

“I still eat!”
So does everybody else. You can’t photosynthesise, after all. Even people with eating disorders eat.

“I feel like a fake/ a fraud!”
So does basically every single other eating disordered person. This is a really, really, really, really common feeling. You might feel guilty for ‘misleading’ other people into believing the problem is more serious than it is, or feel like you’re overblowing things. That’s totally normal and it is not true. You are not a fake or a fraud.

“I eat things that no real anorexic would eat!”
I have known eating disordered patients with these safe foods: chocolate, frozen meat pizza, fruit, ice cream cones, potatoes, granola
I have known eating disordered patients with these fear foods: : chocolate, frozen meat pizza, fruit, ice cream cones, potatoes, granola
Safe/fear foods are not based on logic or reason. They are individualised. There are even people who don’t have any fear foods- they’ll eat anything, they’ll just feel crappy and purge it/ restrict afterwards. All of the experiences described here are those of a person with an eating disorder.

“I’ve never been inpatient!”
Neither have most eating disorder sufferers.

“I’ve never been tube fed!”
Neither have most eating disorder sufferers.

“I’ve never been near death!”
Neither have most eating disorder sufferers.

“My blood work/ blood pressure is fine!
Eating disorders affect different bodies in different ways. Some people find their blood work suffers; others find their blood pressure or pulse dips; others find that, whilst they’re suffering hugely mentally, their bodies hold up well. This is not a measure of how ‘sick’ you are. All of these things- weight, bp, pulse etc- are just symptoms of the sickness. The sickness is in your head.

“I don’t feel sick enough.”
You never will. Sorry. “I’m not sick enough!” is one of the most common ED thoughts there is; please don’t listen to it. It is a lie. Do not compare your misery to someone else’s; nobody with stage I cancer says ‘yeah, but that person is a stage III, so I’m not really that bad and I won’t get any treatment yet’.

“I still get my period!”
‘Period loss’ has been removed from the DSM as necessary for a diagnosis of anorexia, and no other eating disorder requires it. It was viewed as a flawed measure of illness, and so it has been removed. Whether or not you get your period is not an indication of how ill you are.

“But I binge eat without throwing up”
Binge eating disorder is a newly added eating disorder in the DSM, where people eat large amounts of food in an ‘out of control’ manner but then do not compensate inappropriately for it. It is very much a real eating disorder.

“I don’t calorie count/ weigh myself!”
I know many people with eating disorders- including anorexia- who have never calorie counted, or who don’t own a pair of scales. It’s not required for diagnosis.

“I think about food all the time!”
This is a symptom of an eating disorder. Malnutrition causes the brain to focus 100% of its attention on food- finding it, getting it, eating it. Daydreaming or fantasizing about food does not mean you are not sick; quite the opposite, in fact.

“But I enjoy eating!”
Most people do. Eating is enjoyable. Even in the depths of my restriction, the food I ate brought me great pleasure. It’s linked to the previous point, to a certain extent. Enjoying food does not mean you don’t have an ED.

“But this is just how I am!”
Eating disorders often start in early childhood, and it can be hard to break out of a pattern that well-entrenched. It’s not impossible, though. Chronic eating disorders can be harder to beat, but they can be beaten.

–

(part of Mental Health Awareness week)

For more information on eating disorders and what to do if you think you have one, visit

www.b-eat.co.uk

www.webiteback.com

http://www.something-fishy.org

NHS- overcoming eating disorders

www.joyproject.org

I know that you are a reptile tumblr but I was wondering if you knew if it were healthy for dogs to be vegans? I’m just curious because of some vegans that have animals and they make them vegans… is it harmful towards the animal or is it completely safe? thank you :)

fackfackfackfack:

why-animals-do-the-thing:

kaijutegu:

It’s an absolutely horrible idea. Dogs cannot be vegans and thrive. They’re not vegetarians and they’re not even really omnivores in the same way we are- while dogs will eat everything we do (and more), feeding them a vegan diet is terrible for their health. A lot of vegans who make this decision will blather on about supplements in the vegan food or about how you can make artificial amino acids or how dogs can survive on it so therefore it’s safe, but dogs can also survive eating Ol’ Roy, the worst dog food in the world. Surviving isn’t the same thing as thriving! A dog’s biological structure means that eating plants and only plants isn’t going to work well in the long run- so let’s look at some of the reasons why dogs need to be fed a diet based in animal protein. 

1. The canine digestive tract is not good at digesting plant matter.

Plant matter is really tough to break down! Meat, on the other hand, digests quickly. Carnivores and herbivores have differently structured digestive tracts that work with their diets. Let’s look at a rabbit’s digestive tract and a dog’s.

See how a rabbit has a functional cecum, while the dog’s is just a little snub of a thing? The cecum is an organ that plays a really important role in non-ruminant herbivore digestion. It’s a large pouch where cellulose and tough fibers in plant-based food get broken down. Dogs, like humans, don’t have one that’s functional for digestion. 

In addition, herbivores like rabbits have very long, complicated digestive tracts. Their food sits in there and breaks down over a long period of time. An average adult rabbit (with a body of about 40 centimeters long, we’re not talking the giant breeds or the dwarf breeds here) has about three meters of small intestine. In American units, that’s a 15 inch animal with almost 10 feet of intestines. A dog, on the other hand, has a small intestine that’s about two and a half times the length of its body- so for instance, a dog that’s two feet long would have about five feet of small intestine. There’s neither enough time nor space in the canine alimentary canal for dogs to fully extract the nutrients they need to survive. 

2. Dog drool doesn’t have amylase.

Amylase an enzyme that converts plant starch and glycogen into simple sugars. Herbivores and omnivores typically have amylase in the saliva, which starts to break down those starches immediately. This means by the time the starches hit the intestine, they’ve already started to convert into something that’s actually useful. Dogs, however, only produce it in the pancreas. There’s no salivary amylase in dogs or any other carnivore. This means that digesting plants and converting their energy into something that’s actually useful is really inefficient for dogs; they can only get something like half of the energy and nutrients they’d get from a comparable amount of meat. It also means that to digest plant material, dogs’ pancreases have to go into overtime to make enough amylase, which can lead to severe pancreatic strain.

3. Dogs can’t digest cellulose.

While the dog pancreas makes amylase, something it doesn’t make is cellulase. Granted, herbivores don’t make it either- in fact, very few animals do. Termites are one of the only animals that make their own cellulase. Herbivore digestive tracts have a reservoir of symbiotic bacteria that produce plenty of cellulase. We’ve actually talked about it- it’s what goes on in the cecum! The bacteria in carnivore ceca, however, is linked to the lymphatic system, not the digestive system. 

There’s also the issue of their teeth not being adapted for a plant-based diet or even the way they eat being good at taking in plants- but the same is true for anything that’s not animal carcasses, including kibble and wet dog food. That’s just evidence that defines them as opportunistic carnivores; what makes a vegan diet so bad for dogs is their digestive biology.

There is one exception to this rule, and that is when a vet prescribes a vegan diet for an animal with significant food allergies or other dietary issues. This is not something vets do unless it’s the best course of treatment for the animal. 

Veganism isn’t the same thing as being an herbivore. Herbivores don’t have a choice; their bodies aren’t built for eating meat. While they might take in animal protein on occasion (deer, for instance, will eat birds sometimes), their teeth, their digestive systems, and their metabolisms all work together to make eating plants the best way for them to survive. A rabbit’s not a vegan- it’s an herbivore. Only humans can be vegans. To be a vegan is to make a choice; it’s to evaluate your place in the world around you and to renegotiate your relationship with all sorts of things- your own body, the food industry, the people around you, and of course the animals you don’t eat. Responsible vegans understand that humans can thrive on an all-vegetable diet; they know that we evolved to be really, really flexible when it comes to the source of our nutrition. While humans are biologically omnivores, we can make that choice.

A dog can’t, and it’s not humanity’s place to force that on them. There are some pets that thrive on an all-vegetable diet. Rabbits, tortoises, finches, hamsters, snails- but not dogs. 

If you’d like more information, this is a fantastic write-up, complete with sources! This is a good, short article written by a vet. This is a blog post that talks about some of the other nutritional deficiencies, particularly involving D3. This is another great writeup with diagrams!

I will never not reblog a post that hits this issue home. The last link in @kaijutegu‘s post is my article on the topic – if you want to argue the point, go read it first and then we can chat. 

I don’t think I’ve seen the point “Only humans can be vegan” before, but I love it.

I’m in the guinea pig care community a fair bit, and I see a lot of “yay veganism” and some promotion of veganism (one shelter I follow goes to a lot of pro-vegan events, which I find generally weird). But this explains a little on why that unsettles me. Humans can be vegan, but animals cannot. They may line up with our food beliefs (such as cavies not being able to eat meat) but applying a social-political concept, such as veganism, is just… Wholly misunderstanding animals. Herbivores aren’t “making a stand” to not eat meat. They don’t have that ability.

Don’t belittle other people’s sources of pleasure.

aegipan-omnicorn:

I remember, one time at summer camp we were having a camp-wide “party” (we were served in the camp meeting hall instead of the dining hall, and there were tablecloths), and part of dessert was opening fortune cookies (no, the food was not “Asian” themed).

And I opened my cookie and the message read: “You need to learn to have more fun.” I thought it was utter codswallop, because “fun” was the only reason I did anything.

But when I read the fortune out loud, there was a chorus of voices saying the message was perfect for me, because all I ever did in my free time was read the dictionary, or encyclopedia, and I never did anything fun at all.

My protests of: “But reading the dictionary is fun, to me!” were mocked.  Not even the adult counselors said anything in my defense (though I realize now that those “adults” were very likely a lot younger than we imagined them).


This memory came back to me after umpteen years because I was thinking about how I can be asexual and sex-positive at the same time. I, personally, may indifferent to the thought of getting squelchy with another person. But, apparently, a lot of other people find a great deal of joy and fulfillment in the act. So – for them – I think sex is great (as long as it’s safe, sane, and consensual). The world can always use more joy and fulfillment.

And the anti-asexual rhetoric of insisting that you have to include sex in a relationship in order for it to be “committed” and “meaningful” reminds me of those kids at summer camp who were convinced that the only way to have fun is to be loud.

And the more I thought about it, I realized that we keep doing it throughout our culture – whether it’s insisting that people have to drink alcohol at a party, or have to have sex in a committed relationship, or whether it’s trying to shame someone for liking kids’ cartoons, or liking a musician who uses auto-tune.

As long as someone’s happiness is not at the expense of another person – support them.

Life is hard enough as it is.

That’s all for now.