In 1966, Ronald Reagan was elected governor of California on a promise to “clean up the mess at Berkeley,” which he described as “a haven for communist sympathizers, protesters, and sex deviants.” Reagan got the school’s president fired, attempted to cut the educational budget, and, in 1969, ordered an armed confrontation with student demonstrators who were protesting the war. Officers opened fire with shotguns and tear gas. One student, a bystander, was killed. Another was permanently blinded, and 32 were hospitalized with severe injuries.

On May 1, 1970, President Richard Nixon told an audience at the Pentagon: “You see these bums, you know, blowing up the campuses. Listen, the boys that are on the college campuses today are the luckiest people in the world, going to the greatest universities, and here they are burning up the books, storming around about [the Vietnam War].” Three days later, the Ohio National Guard opened fire on student protesters at Kent State University, leaving four students dead and nine wounded. On May 15, local police killed two black students and left twelve more wounded during a demonstration at Jackson State University in Jackson, Mississippi.

Somehow, despite decades’ worth of counterexamples, the American mainstream remains convinced that campus activists represent a unique threat to public safety and civil discourse.

diversegaminglists:

So my current PIP disability claim ends tomorrow (31st August). I have already started the process for a new claim but my income will be cut in half until that’s successful (IF the claim is successful it will be backdated but I’m not confident I’ll get *anything*).

So the upcoming 1700 followers giveaway will be the last one for sometime.

If you’d like to support my work financially you can:

donate to me on kofi

support me on patreon

or you could buy a copy of part one of my romance novel on amazon kindle (the second part is mostly done, but not out yet)

Rethinking Autism: From Social Awkwardness to Social Creativity – Behavioral Scientist

butterflyinthewell:

autisticpgh:

We’re now understanding what people on the autism spectrum have rather than what they lack.

Interesting article, but I hated the functioning labels and I hate that they never include nonverbal people (both who use AAC and who can’t make their communications understood) in studies like this.

Even though it’s a good study, there’s still an unspoken message that the most vulnerable members of the autistic community keep being ignored unless they’re talked about in a negative light.

Rethinking Autism: From Social Awkwardness to Social Creativity – Behavioral Scientist

thalassarche:

orson-bigdaddy-krennic:

shamblingshitpickle:

PSA: journalists aren’t supposed to put names in the headlines if the person isn’t a public figure. It’s not a matter of maliciously not giving credit

^^^as a journalist, this is something that bothers me ALL THE TIME

A friend of mine on Twitter explained this the other day, so to elaborate based on what she said: If the name is not instantly recognizable the way a public figure is, then putting the name in the headline isn’t going to bring about any sort of recognition or connection in the reader, and doesn’t do much to draw the reader into the story. But something like “local teen” does create a connection by tying the person into the community, and encourages the reader to learn more about what this local teen has done. The name will be in the article itself, after the headline has done its job at getting the reader to look into it.

thresholdofzero:

snapchat-me-ur-puppy:

I can’t believe people on this site are defending looting. Y’all realize that the corner stores and gas stations that are being broken into are also primarily owned by poc right?

Y’all realize that the people looting can evacuate to a shelter and get necessities right? If they’re stranded they can reach out and be rescued or just fucking ask right?

Jesus Christ this site can be so toxic sometimes.

You realize that these stores that are flooding are going to have to throw away almost all of their stock, right? So all that food is going to either be thrown away, or eaten by people in desperate need. Are you telling me you’d rather see it thrown out?

Those business owners have insurance and will be paid for damages and losses.

These people are looting to feed their families because just like in Katrina, it can take days or even weeks to be rescued.

Getting around in a flood isn’t as easy as just ‘going to a shelter’. Especially if you have small children, elderly or disabled family members or pets, it is probably easier and safer to send able bodied adults to get food while you wait for rescue.

Human life will always be more important and material objects.