I’m trying to prove a point to my brain: Reblog if you think fanfiction does not need sex to be good.

aegipan-omnicorn:

popsicleofdeath:

There is a trend I’ve noticed that smut fics tend to be much more popular than anything else and honestly I just want to have something to look at to remind myself and that writing doesn’t have to have sex to be worth putting out into the community.

I’d actually (in all likelihood) be more into the fanfic wing of fandom (both writing and reading) if there were less focus on ‘shipping, in general (not just smut fic, but romances, too). 

Whole discourses have sprung up around ‘One True Pairings.’ And those discourses have grown into factions. And frankly, the whole culture makes me want to avoid the whole thing.

Pretty similar her, and one reason I am not that deep into fandom in general these days. I’m personally just not nearly as interested in the frequently heavy focus on shipping and fics largely driven by that, as in other ways of exploring and developing the universes. I’ll basically read around that type of content, as long as the relationship stuff is part of an otherwise interesting story. (Same with other types of content, pretty much across the board.) But, it’s really not something I go looking for.

It’s totally fine to be more excited by shipping, of course. Not trying to criticize anyone else’s way of engaging with fiction, or what types of stories they prefer to write and read. But, not everyone does have the same interests or ways of engaging, and it feels a bit odd how this question has kept coming up over maybe the past 5 years or so.

Text of H.R. 3571: Reasonable ADA Compliance Act of 2017 (Introduced version) – GovTrack.us

actuallyblind:

lunaplath:

urbancripple:

This legal turd comes from the lovely state of Florida, home of boiled peanuts and racism. Before we begin, I want to clearly state that I AM NOT A LAWYER and nothing in this post should be construed as anything more than my snarky, cynical, possible ill-informed opinion regarding this piece of legislation.

The purpose of the bill is stated as:

To amend title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to require a plaintiff to provide a defendant with an opportunity to correct a violation of such title voluntarily before the plaintiff may commence a civil action, and for other purposes.

According to ADA.gov, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (colloquially known as “The ADA”):

…prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the activities of places of public accommodations (businesses that are generally open to the public and that fall into one of 12 categories listed in the ADA, such as restaurants, movie theaters, schools, day care facilities, recreation facilities, and doctors’ offices) and requires newly constructed or altered places of public accommodation—as well as commercial facilities (privately owned, nonresidential facilities such as factories, warehouses, or office buildings)—to comply with the ADA Standards.

H.R. 3571 seeks to change the ADA by giving entities that violate Title III an:

(3) Opportunity to correct alleged violation

(A)

In general

A State or Federal court shall not have jurisdiction in a civil action that a plaintiff commences under paragraph (1), or under a State law that conditions a violation of any of its provisions on a violation of this title, unless—

(i)

before filing a complaint alleging a violation of this title or such a State law, the plaintiff provides the defendant with a written notice of the alleged violation by registered mail;

(ii)

the written notice identifies the facts that constitute the alleged violation, including the location where and the date on which the alleged violation occurred;

(iii)

a remedial period of 120 days elapses after the date on which the plaintiff provides the written notice;

(iv)

the written notice informs the defendant that the plaintiff is barred from filing the complaint until the end of the remedial period; and

(v)

the complaint states that, as of the date on which the complaint is filed, the defendant has not corrected the alleged violation.

(B)

Extension of remedial period

The court may extend the remedial period by not more than 30 days if the defendant applies for such an extension.

TL;DR: If a person or business violates Title III of the ADA, they have to be notified of the violation in writing via registered mail and then have up to 150 days (120 days plus a possible 30 day extension) to correct the violation before they are open to any kind of civil action (i.e., a lawsuit) can take place.

Now, when I first read this, I was thinking to myself: Hmmm. This seems odd but not terribly insidious. 

Luckily Gregg Beratan was there to remind me that the ADA is, in fact, a civil rights law and that we don’t give people and companies who violate other civil rights laws 150 days to get their act together before we sue the ever-loving fuck out of them. The ADA has been in place for 27 years. People and businesses have had plenty of time to comply with the law.

Imagine the following exchanges:

Government Official: We hear your restaurant is not accessible to people with disabilities.

Restaurant Owner: You caught us. We need six months to comply. It takes time to add ramps and grab-bars

Government Official: We hear your restaurant is refusing to serve people of color.

Restaurant Owner: You caught us. We need six months to comply. It takes time to start seeing people of color as…well….people.

Starting to see my point? The ADA has been reasonable enough for nearly three decades. If companies can’t be bothered to comply with the law, they shouldn’t bother to do business at all.

I’m a blind lawyer. I’d like to expand on this issue. 

My favorite quote:

“If companies can’t be bothered to comply with the law, they shouldn’t bother to do business at all.”

If you guys really want to see me rage, ask me about this proposed bill. 

The only reason that businesses are pissed about these violations is because they have never heard of or thought of the ADA. The reason they have never heard of the ADA is because they are bad business owners. Anyone who cares about running a business well looks into the legal requirements for starting a business, including things like health codes, fire codes, and public accommodations statutes such as the ADA.

Imagine a business violating the health code by having roaches crawl all over the counters in the kitchen as they prepare your food. The health department shuts down their restaurant and the business owner says, “But I didn’t know I wasn’t allowed to have a bug-infested kitchen.” The health department will probably laugh at them and say too bad, ignorance of the law is no excuse. 

“But,” you sputter, “having a bug-infested kitchen is not the same as violating the ADA!”

Yes it is.

By refusing to comply, owners create a dangerous condition for a large portion of the population. A huge number of Americans are older and have disabilities that relate to age. Any business owner can expect to members of the public who are disabled, whether they are older or not. 

The reason there are so many ADA lawsuits right now over public access isn’t because the lawsuits are frivolous, it’s because there are a lot of disabled people in this country who want to go out and live their lives just like anyone else.

As @urbancripple pointed out, the ADA is a civil rights statute. Disabled people have a right to enter public spaces without endangering themselves. The reason I bring up that point is because businesses, before the ADA, could legally force people with disabilities to leave for simply looking disabled. If customers didn’t want to look at a person with a visible disability while they ate dinner, these customers could (and did!) ask business owners to kick out the disabled person. And the business owner would do it!! 

I personally know Deaf people who have been kicked out of public businesses for publicly using sign language. Yes, their native language. Recently, Starbucks in New York got into trouble for trying to force a group of Deaf people to leave its business for buying coffee, hanging out while drinking the coffee, and using sign language to speak to each other while doing so. I guess having more than a few Deaf people in the business at once scared the able-bodied people or something. /s

I have had businesses try to kick me out SO MANY TIMES because I have a guide dog. From your average Chinese Buffet to “trendy” restaurants that serve vegan global street food in the capital city of my damn state. I’ve also tried to find the bathroom in these “trendy” restaurants, only to realize that there are no braille labels for the bathrooms, even though I’m in a brand new building and the labels themselves cost hardly anything. I have complained about this to business managers before, often in the nicest terms possible, even offering to bring my own braille label maker and make a sign for them FOR FREE, only to be met with hostility and defensiveness. 

I have done the EXACT THING that this bill is suggesting–giving people notice and time to correct the issue–and the business owners just get angry and never fix the problem. The people who run these places aren’t mad because they didn’t have notice of violating the law before being sued, they’re mad because they don’t care about allowing access for all people and resent the fact that you want them to care. 

Also, if you’re in an older building that hasn’t been renovated, the business owner can’t be sued for ADA violations. There is already an exception that prevents it. This exception was part of the original text of the law.

And if you’re in a new building but you chose not to follow laws, then you are doing so at your own risk. In that case, it is your own fault that you are being sued. The disabled person isn’t being unreasonable by suing you because it’s not our responsibility to explain every law of this country to business owners. 

!!!! Fucking yes thank you for this!! This is exactly the problem and this is exactly the kind of thorough explanation I am here for.

Text of H.R. 3571: Reasonable ADA Compliance Act of 2017 (Introduced version) – GovTrack.us

npr:

As Harvey, the largest rainstorm in the history of the continental United States, floods homes in Texas and Louisiana, many Americans want to send money for relief efforts.

The need for that help will be enormous: FEMA Administrator Brock Long has saidmore than 195,000 people already have registered for disaster assistance.

Many reputable organizations already are delivering food and care to those in need. But experts on charitable giving say donors need to be wary: con artists are also after your money. Scam charities raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in the aftermath of 2012’s Hurricane Sandy, and they are likely to try it again now.

Don’t Fall Victim To Harvey Flood Scams

Photo: Brendan Smialowsk/AFP/Getty Images

Help her get a scooter!

venetian-empire:

In 2014, an Indigenous woman was sexually assaulted, brutally attacked and then set on fire. This horrific incident resulted in her having both legs amputated and needing to use an electric scooter for mobility.

Recently, her scooter was stolen along with her pain medication. If you can please donate money to the GoFundMe link below. And if you can’t please spread the link.

Thank you ❤️

https://www.gofundme.com/scooter-for-marlene-bird

Could you please reblog this @allthecanadianpolitics?

At $725 of $6,000 goal, on 1 September 2017

coffeegleek:

There’s a FB post going around with a pic from Katrina of a couple of African Americans with goods in their hands in front of a store, claiming they’re looters in TX in this hurricane. Horrible comments too along the lines of “There they go again,” “thugs,” and “Next, they’ll hit up the liquor store.” Hub called them (a former coworker of his had shared and commented on it) out on the pic being fake. I called them out on the racist language. Fucking pisses me off! Bet you there’s ZERO fake stories about white people/”thugs” committing crimes.

mquester:

sulphur-crested-cocktease:

shidgephobe:

wrotemyown:

araceil:

denaceleste:

nwcostumer:

wrangletangle:

beatrice-otter:

tomato-greens:

joestrummin:

i didnt realise ao3 was started in response to lj deleting account relating to p//edophi|ia and they explicitly support the posting of such works yikes

it wasn’t, like, ~~~we luv pedophilia, it was way more complicated than that!

although it’s true AO3 does allow all fannish content provided it’s properly warned for, there’s a long history there – of spaces being used by fans until the host decided whatever we were doing was too weird and distasteful and either kicking us off, banning certain content, or changing the nature of the site until it was no longer viable as a host.

you’re referring to the LJ Strikethrough of 2007, which, being an ancient crone, I lived through, and since I was hanging out in the last vestiges of SGA and in bandom, I saw some of the fallout. this was before LJ was sold to the Russians (which is a whole ‘nother story), when it was still owned by Six Apart; in an effort to clean up LJ’s act, Six Apart decided to delete all accounts using tags like underage, incest, rape, etc.

this was supposed to get rid of actual child porn on the site, and I hope it did, but it also targeted fan communities. this was a problem for a couple reasons; for one thing, not every story tagged with these words is in favor of them; for another, these things happen to real people and these personal posts were also potentially in danger of being attacked; for the last one, look, I ain’t into this kind of fic but people write about what people write about, and if it’s fictional and not explicitly banned in the TOS (correct me if I’m wrong; I don’t think written content about this stuff was banned?) then it’s not cool for a content host to just start deleting communities without warning.

but that’s what happened! these deletions were also primarily targeting slash communities, which smacked of some serious homophobia since things were deleted that had nothing to do with any of this kind of content.

eventually someone found out it was this super conservative religious group who’d sent a list of journal names to Six Apart, and who if I remember correctly targeted slash fic on purpose, even after it became clear that the fic was, well, totally fictional. after a while, Six Apart admitted they’d made a mistake and started to reinstate journals, but all of fandom was pretty shaken up.

THEN Boldthrough happened, which was essentially the same debacle several months later, at which point fandom began its long slow migration from LJ to GJ, IJ, and eventually AO3, Twitter, and tumblr.

AO3 was opened in 2008 in response to several incidents, of which Strikethrough was a really intense one. remember, also, that back in 2008 the stigma surrounding fandom was significantly greater and more shameful than it is today, so finding hosts willing to archive fic was difficult unless someone had the dough to pay for server space – often not an option. this was also back when fanfic.net’s HTML restrictions were so great that users couldn’t use any special characters or bold or italicize anything, and it didn’t allow R-rated content, so it was clearly not ideal. in addition, although cease & desist letters were much less common than they were in the early 2000s and before, DMCA takedowns were still a phantom on the horizon.

LONG STORY SHORT, even though pedophilia is reprehensible and I personally cannot stomach fanfic that involves that kind of content, AO3 was founded specially as a safe space for fandom communities that could not find homes elsewhere. it requires warnings precisely for that reason, and if you find a story that is not properly warned, you can alert the admins and get the story labeled appropriately.

IDK, maybe it’s just because I am, again, ancient, but I was in and around fandom before homosexuality was legal in all 50 states. so were most of the people who started AO3. for most of my formative life, being gay was associated with pedophilia, and so was writing about gay characters. just – it’s a lot more complicated than you might expect, and there’s a reason many older fans who have been involved in several generations of fandom were so grateful to have AO3 as an option.

I don’t read, for example, Hydra Trash Party fics.  They squick me, and I generally feel they are pretty gross.  But writing noncon body-horror is not the same as saying “yeah, I totally want to go out and rape and torture people for years while brainwashing them!” or even “yeah, I wouldn’t do it myself, but it would be totally okay if someone did!”  Nobody is hurt by it, and nobody is going to be hurt by it.  So should I have the right to go, that is gross, you don’t get to write or read that?  No.

In the same way, writing about underage teens getting it on–sometimes with each other, sometimes with adults, sometimes consensually, sometimes not–is not the same as child pornography, nor does reading a fic about Hermione and Snape getting it on while she was his student mean someone thinks that would be a good and/or healthy thing in real life.

Fiction affects reality, but fiction is not reality.  And writing about something does not mean you want to do it in real life, or believe that anyone should.

Let’s take a closer look at that “Ao3 supports pedophilia!” shall we?

1) The only fics I have ever come across that had actual pedophilia (i.e. someone having sex with a child), it was clearly and explicitly abuse.  It was not meant to titillate or arouse.  It was meant to horrify.  It was seldom explicit.

2) There’s a lot more incest, but it is usually portrayed either as explicitly mutually consensual (i.e. Sam/Dean) or as abusive.

3) I’ve been in fandom for a decade and a half.  When people start getting upset at “omg pedophilia, think of the children!” the fics they are usually objecting to aren’t actually pedophilia.  Usually, it is teenagers having sex, especially queer sex.  And people don’t like that, and use pedophilia as an excuse to shame people for writing/reading sex they don’t like.

Let’s look closer at Strikethrough, shall we?  I hope that, if there were any communities of actual pedophiles on LJ, they got taken down, too.  But here are some of the communities that got taken down that were not in any way supporting pedophilia and/or rape and/or incest that got taken down:

1) at least one support community for survivors of sexual abuse.

2) a literary book discussion group that was reading Lolita.

3) lots of slash fanfic communities, for things like Draco/Harry fic set in their fourth year (when both boys would have been 15).

Basically, this very conservative “family values” group hated porn, and they hated queer stuff even more, and used “but think of the children, it’s pedophilia!” to pressure LJ to get rid of huge swathes of things they didn’t like.  And one time taking down the worst of it wasn’t good enough for them.  No, this was step one on a moral crusade.  If you acceded to their demands, all that did was whet their appetite, and soon they would be back with a new list of demands.  This is why the 2007 strikethrough was not an isolated event, but rather one of a series of events, nor was LJ the only website thus targeted.  It starts with anything that can get labelled “pedophilia” or “incest” because that’s low-hanging fruit.  But they use that to go after anything relating to queer teen sexuality.  Then anything with teen sexuality.  Then once the community is already divided and diminished, they go after anything with non-con.  Then whatever is next on their list.  It doesn’t stop until they’ve won the point and nothing but suitably “family-friendly” fics that match their purity test are allowed.

Which is why AO3 has no morality content in their terms of service.  You can’t break copyright beyond fair use (and AO3 has an expansive view of “fair use” and a team of lawyers on call).  You can’t use AO3 for commercial advertising.  And you can’t post ACTUAL child pornography, i.e. the things that are legally prohibited, i.e. actual photographs or videos of actual children (not teens) in sexually explicit positions–you know, the stuff that actually hurts kids.  Other than that?  It’s fair game.  You can post anything you want, and the archive will not judge.  There is no handle for the Moral Majority Family-Friendly Thought Police to latch onto, no cracks they can exploit to divide and conquer.

We’ve been down that road.  It doesn’t lead anywhere good.

Reblogging this for the excellent explanation of what exactly the moral crusaders did last time. They had an explicit agenda of anti-queerness, and they specifically targeted slash and femslash communities in particular, such that many ship communities became (or started as) deliberately members-only. You had to apply, and your personal blog had to look like a real person and a fan. You were vetted, a la 1990s private servers.

During this period, Dreamwidth was also targeted by attacking its payment processor. They had to get a new one. These “Warriors” (literally called themselves that!) were totally on board with destroying fandom as a side effect of destroying the parts of fandom they didn’t like.

If you’re carrying out harassment of people right now because they’re posting works with sexual elements you don’t agree with? (And it’s always sex, never non-sexual violence, how strange….) If you’re doing that, you’re also totally on board with destroying fandom as a side effect of destroying the parts of fandom you don’t like. Because your tactics are fandom-destroying, and so is your agenda.

reblogging because this is important: strikethru and boldthru and all the various “purges” that fandom went thru about 10 years ago: this had to do with OUTSIDERS deciding that fandom in general and fanfiction in specific were evil and needed to be destroyed; unless we were writing and shipping good vanilla M/F married people. These were outsiders, going after fictional writing about fictional characters.

AO3 and OTW are HUGE, because now we have an organization, with very smart women and a lot of lawyers, that have our back. Fannish history is important, people! It has not always been this way.

This is so, so important: there’s that other post about AO3 and fanfiction floating around, about our history. People decry violent video games but no one is trying to force companies out of business. But people can and do attack fanfiction: an activity primarily written by women for women, about fictional characters. And often about sex. We have to constantly defend ourselves, protect ourselves, support each other against charges like “paeodophilia”.

^^^rebageling again for excellent commentary

Throwing this in because I was also present: This was during the American Government’s attempts to pass censorship laws on the internet. As MOST of those domains had their serves in America, they were beholden to those censorship laws. A great deal of fanfiction.net was removed because they happened to lose a goddamn courtcase. I’ve been on the site since 2002. They may not have ‘officially’ allowed NC-17 rated content (what it used to be listed as in the filters), it never did a damn thing to remove it. Ever. They had it listed as a rating option during ‘New Story’ uploading after all. It was i nthe search filters. After they lost the courtcase however, they legally had to start doing things about the mature content reports they got. The admins and mods were not actively looking for fic to remove, they were just responding to reports they had already received. 

tl;dr – I know tumblr is all about black and white “you’re either all right or all wrong” thinking, but it’s important to understand what actually happened before going “ew ao3 was made to give pedophiles a safe place to post” because that is 110% not what happened.

This is why so, so many of the comparatively older fannish folks on tumblr like me are so vehemently against stuff like the anti movement and “all ships are valid UNLESS”. It smacks of censorship and content policing – and we’ve been there. We got our shit deleted and our accounts banned because someone else thought what we were reading or writing or talking about needed to just… not exist. No warning. Literally overnight. We just woke up and stuff was gone.

And yeah, the group was legit called Warriors for Innocence (or maybe of). I knew several people that were members of survivor/support groups that lost their groups – and their main support network – when Strikethrough happened (ten years ago holy shit).

You antis need to listen when us older fans tell you that the censorship you’re advocating for, when put into practice, is NOT a positive thing; it’s an extremely scary thing!

I can guarantee that you would be very, very upset if another event like LJ Strikethrough were to happen today because *you* are just as vulnerable as the rest of us! If you support the rights of marginalized groups of people, if you’re a slash or fem slash shipper, if you support gender identities that aren’t defined by biological sex, if you care about representation, if you support women, if you have any kind of kink, if you care about fandom in any capacity beyond its eradication, YOU DO NOT ACTUALLY WANT THE SORT OF CENSORSHIP YOU’RE ADVOCATING!!

I feel so old now. I’ve been through Dreamwidth but never made many friends there, and Livejournal for ten years until the strikethrough fiasco. I remember having posts about news stories I had linked deleted because they were about rape cases for example.

Before that there were newsgroups where a mod might just decide to block you or delete the whole newsgroup at any time without warning and you lost your community. There were years of Geocities and other host sites run by individual fans disappearing- because a parent was threatening to sue a fan writer because a minor had lied to access adult writing, or cease and desist letters from publishing companies that scared writers into removing works.

Just, you don’t have to like fanfiction or fanart. You can believe slash is homophobic or underage fic is pedophilia. You can be disgusted by vore or think 50 shades of gray fanfiction shouldn’t exist since it is fanfiction of a crappy Twilight fanfiction.

But once you start policing what is and isn’t acceptable? It starts to snowball and someone else might believe what you believe is wrong, isn’t conservative enough, and soon even fan works you like will be censored.

Ask some oldtimers from fandoms ten or twenty years ago and you’ll realize how you might be turning back the clock and how hard it was to stay connected with your favorite writers and artists…

P.S. Any old fogeys who used to be in “The Sentinel” fandom with me? Ooh, or “Forever Knight” 😛 Lucasfilm was always threatening “The Phantom Menace” fanfiction writers and you didn’t dare write anything using Anne Rice’s books. Ah, the good old days…

theragnarokd:

neurodiversitysci:

fuckingconversations:

myautisticpov:

Diagnostic criteria for autism are always so badly written.

Like, the trains thing.

I’m going to keep coming back to the trains thing because it baffles me.

So, the example used for special interests in a lot of diagnostic criteria is trains.

“Has an unusually strong interest in something – for example, trains”

And, like, sure. Okay. Special interests can be anything. Trains are a possibility.

But, like, special interests don’t appear out of nowhere. You generally have to be exposed to something first to get a special interest in it.

So, like, I know a lot of autistic people, and I know no one with a special interest in trains.

You know what the most common special interest is, in my experience?

Star Wars.

Yeah, go fucking figure, the ubiquitous movie franchise that almost everyone has seen at least one movie of is the most common special interest, in my experience.

Now, I do kind of understand the trains thing. The line between special interest and regular interest isn’t always super obvious.

Like, collecting Star Wars toys, or writing Star Wars fanfic, or marathoning the movies a bunch of times doesn’t necessarily make it a special interest.

And since it’s socially acceptable (especially in modern day nerd culture) to do all of those things, it’s not a glaring indicator of autism to outsiders.

If someone’s really into something obscure – like trains – however, it can make the fact that it’s a special interest super obvious.

But it’s still bad to have it be the go-to special interest example because it’s just not that common.

Plenty of autistic people don’t have obscure special interests. Their SIs are in the Marvel movies or Star Wars or Star Trek or Five Nights at Freddy’s.

Hell, part of the problem with women and girls not getting diagnosed is because no one notices their special interests in, like, makeup or boy bands.

When you use “trains” as the example, you’re sending the implicit message that special interests have to be obscure and out of the social norm, and that’s just not the case for most people – especially now that a lot of geek culture has gone mainstream and there’s a huge nostalgia cash-in.

Having a special interest in Power Rangers was weird for me when I was 14. It’s not now that it’s a big blockbuster movie and most people exposed to the internet review-sphere are at least aware of Linkara’s History of Power Rangers.

Special interests don’t have to be outside the social norm to be special interests. It’s how the autistic person feels about them and engages with them that defines it.

Friendly reminder that Dan Aykroyd was diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome

and his special interests are ‘Ghosts’ and ‘Law Enforcement’  – He wrote Ghostbusters. 

But, Special Interests don’t have to be ‘productive’ or exploitable for money. It’s just something that makes you happy – that’s enough. 

Random off topic aside: why is there the assumption that when autistic girls develop common interests it’s hyper girly stuff not more neutral things like horses or virtual pets? I would imagine that, being more gender non-conforming, and not eager to conformto pop culture, they’d fall into the gender neutral bookworm category or even the tomboy category. I doubt the research is there to support or refute that hypothesis since we only recently started researching autism in girls. But the fact that this assumption that autisticgirls would be into hyper girly things is interesting, and worth examining.

But yeah, it’s a lot less obvious to be “that guy who’s way too into what’s popular than the person obsessed with discussing an interest no one around shares.

well, autistic girls with a special interest in fashion or makeup certainly EXIST, and they tend to be erased even more than ones whose interests are like, My Little Pony, especially since some people still think of autism as “extreme male brain”. So it’s important to note that they exist and could be overlooked in diagnosis.

woke-up-on-derse:

f-f-f-fight:

ithelpstodream:

“In Nepal, 150 people have been killed and 90,000 homes have been destroyed in what the UN has called the worst flooding incident in the country in a decade.

According to the Red Cross, at least 7.1 million people have been affected in Bangladesh – more than the population of Scotland – and around 1.4 million people have been affected in Nepal.

International aid agencies said thousands of villages have been cut off by flooding with people being deprived of food and clean water for days.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/india-floods-bangladesh-nepal-deaths-millions-homeless-latest-news-updates-a7919006.html?cmpid=facebook-post

donate to: 
islamic relief fund
save the children*
save the children – india**
oxfam – south asia flood*
oxfam – india**

* these go into an emergency fund
** for residents of india. otherwise you have to input passport info

edit: updated links

please add any other ways to help

that article is from 5 hours ago. to date this post, it is 8/30. your support matters /now/