thug:
Why do we even need to ask for help? She is totally innocent. What we really need to ask for is to make police accountable for their actions.
Here’s her fund for legal expenses
thug:
Why do we even need to ask for help? She is totally innocent. What we really need to ask for is to make police accountable for their actions.
Here’s her fund for legal expenses
I want to see more fucking historical analyses of medieval Europe that take into account modern research on the importance of attachment for proper brain development (think Bruce Perry’s The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog) and the adverse effects of corporal punishment and the effects of fetal alcohol exposure.
You don’t need to go full ahistorical “the medievals had no concept of childhood and mothers didn’t love their babies” bullshit. Just look at the information we have about beer for breakfast and wet-nursing and beating your children and go from there.
!!!!!!
Honestly I want this for so much of history. “Why did this political crisis happen? because the generation of adults in charge were raised during a parenting trend that deliberately broke a key part of their decision-making circuitry.”
Can’t imagine how I came by the stubborn asshole tendencies. Not at all 😵
I at least try not to cross over certain lines with it. Not sure how well that always works out, but I do try.
Well, I didn’t think to add that he did complain at the city several times before resorting to putting up the speed bump. Pissed off at them as much as the people flying around that curve out front.
But, a bit more character illustration. And that little tantrum got him what he wanted 🙄
So this was on the local news tonight. A mother in a city about 20 minutes south of me has a 10y/o autistic son, and she said that because he’s autistic, she’s afraid he’s going to get hit by a car on the street because he “can’t think” and might just run out into the street without looking. So she called some city officials and requested that they put up this sign in front of her home to warn drivers that there’s an autistic child in the area. Within 3 days, they put this sign up just for her.
As an autistic person myself, this is just rubbing me an enormously wrong way. I don’t like this. At all. In fact, I kinda hate it. It just strikes me as one of those sympathy-addicted Autism Mom™ things that doesn’t take into account the humanity of their autistic kid. Like she needs to announce to the world that she has no idea how to communicate with her own child, and rather than learning what kind of communication methods he needs as an autistic person, she just assumes that he’s just this unreachable burden she’s forced to bear, and is calling on the community to “help” her deal with this creature she can’t “control.” And that lowers this poor boy to sub-human status. Like she thinks they need their own personal “Deer Crossing” sign, but in her cause “Autistic Crossing.” It just strikes me as so wrong.
What do you think?
i’m autistic and i think someone needs to sit this self-involved human disaster of a mom down and give her a good firm talking to about a great many things. she may also need to be smacked upside the head with a salmon once or twice.
jesus fucking christ. where is this sign. i need to go edit it so it reads “[momname]’s attention seeking behavior area”.
Some autistic kids and kids with other disabilities do run out into the street without looking, may not think beforehand about the danger, may not be able to perceive whether cars are coming, etc. Some wander, meaning that they walk sometimes quite far with no specific destination in mind. I’ve seen autistic adults on We Are Like Your Child and similar communities talking about why they did this and how parents can handle it. This mom picked the most self-involved, stigmatizing possible way. Poor kid is going to be known to all his neighbors as “that autism kid,” “that kid who’s so dumb he can’t even cross the street,” and “the reason they put up that road sign.”
(It’s not even a good sign. WTF does “autism area even mean? It’s not even like those street signs warning drivers that blind people may be crossing, where you can at least tell you’re being asked not to run people over. The same words could be used to warn you an Autism could attack you, or run headlong into your car like a deer. Or to inform you that the entire town is autistic people who’ve been banished and quarantined here, like you might see in a dystopian novel. Or maybe it’s an “autism area” because anyone who enters becomes autistic).
Confession time: I was one of those kids who didn’t really get that streets were dangerous when I was, oh, about 3 to six or so years old. Certainly past the age when most kids know not to run into the street because something they were holding blew away or they saw a pretty rock. As late as college, I found it hard to tell how fast cars were coming and when they were going to stop, so I was overly cautious crossing the street. In between, I hated being bored so much that I would literally read books while crossing the street with my parents (knowing that they were watching for cars, and I could just follow them without having to look).
My parents were scared for me, even though we lived in a safe suburban neighborhood then. If I lived in a city with a lot of traffic, or where an oblivious small child could get caught in the crossfire of gang wars, I could have died very young.
Did my parents pester the town government to put up a creepy sign? No. They would hold my hand while crossing the street. They would yell at me to come back if it looked like I were heading into danger (the way you’d yell at someone to stop if they’re about to touch a hot stove). This scared me and I instantly obeyed. They would constantly remind me not to cross the street without an adult, and continually explain why. They still let me walk around the immediate neighborhood on my own, just like the other neighborhood parents did. They told me extremely clearly where I was allowed to go and where I was not. In other words, they acted like parents. Why isn’t that more common?
On top of everything else, there are already the “Careful! Children Playing” type of road warning signs. Children maybe not behaving so safely around roads is a well-known hazard, regardless of any additional factors. The city probably already has a supply of those signs on hand, and maybe putting one of those up in the area would have been appropriate.
As it is, they chose to warn about an Autism and not Children. Says too much about how that poor kid is getting viewed.
When I was little my biodad got pissed off and briefly installed his own speed bump in front of our house, with the way drivers kept whizzing around a curve. The adults of course tried to keep me out of the street, but my 4-year-old autistic ass really was pretty bad about it. The cops made him remove the unauthorized bump, but the city did indeed put up some general purpose “watch out for kids” and extra speed limit signs on the street after that.
As a normal and reasonable response to little kids and careless drivers. Which also sounds like the actual legitimate concern in this other case.

For New Scientist. Order my new book of cartoons ‘Baking with Kafka’ here: https://goo.gl/6sypYT
everyone: why are recidivism rates so high this is inexplicable
everyone: felons aren’t allowed in public housing
everyone: felons don’t get food stamps because people with criminal records don’t need food
everyone: let’s not hire felons. ever.
everyone: let’s require felons to have jobs as a condition of parole
everyone: what if we just… take 100% of felons’ income for their fines, parole fees, and child support
everyone: felons on parole aren’t allowed to talk to other felons. what do you mean “in this neighborhood most men have a criminal record” I don’t know I can’t read suddenly
everyone: felons can’t vote or serve on juries
everyone: never mind felons can vote but only if you pay hundreds of dollars in fees. this is not a poll tax because of reasons
everyone: WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE COMMITTING CRIMES. IT IS PROBABLY BECAUSE OF THE MIND CONTROL PROPERTIES OF SAGGY PANTS
I was also a lot more interested in being a musician myself than the whole manufactured boy band fantasy thing. Just never understood that at all. Makes way more sense with some context gained since after I was out of the target age group.
(Or the similar phenomenon around hair metal bands, for that matter. Actually had more friends engaging with those on a level I just really did not get at the time.)
this is too real
Note this doesn’t work for bi girls!!
Mara Wilson is a bisexual woman
Boy bands are almost overwhelmingly cultivated around the easiest way to sell shit to young girls, which very heavily leans into societally dominant heterosexual love story narratives, which in themselves tend to focus on specific attitudes towards gender roles, presentation, and styles of attraction.
Bi women are not straight so we do not conceptualize our gender and attraction the same way a straight woman would because we do not function under the same societal pressures and dynamics. Ergo, the marketing around and content within the songs by many boy bands can be incredibly alienating to a bi woman audience even if they still experience attraction to men because we often do not experience that attraction in a way palpable to or even considered by those cultivating the public image of these bands.
Accusing Mara Wilson, a bi woman, of bi erasure, for sharing an amusing anecdote on her own experience, is ridiculous. But it is also an incredible disservice to bi women like myself who are more than acutely aware that we are (and always have been) a far cry from this media’s target audience – and it is, in fact, a demonstration of the effects of bi erasure that people so stalwartly align us with heterosexuality that we’re accused of erasing ourselves when we talk about our alienation from mainstream m/f-focused media.
My parents wouldn’t let me listen to Backstreet or Nsync because they thought a 6 year old shouldn’t be interested in boys. But they let me listen to Spice Girls and I’m pretty sure that was the beginning of my gay awakening
[Image description: a string of tweets from Mara Wilson (quote):
Want to know if a woman in her 20s or 30s likes women? Ask them which boy band was her favorite growing up.
If she has to think about it for more than a second, or shrugs, or stares blankly, she likes women.
My girl friends all had crushes on boy band members and had strong affinities for them, but I could never muster up more enthusiasm than “I guess Howie is cute” or “Justin has a good voice.” (unquote)
Timestamped: 11/17/17, 4:34 PM. Description ends]Note: the same is true for asexual girls.
Granted, I had aged out of girlhood by the time “boy bands,” as a thing, became the huge phenomenon of NSYNC and Backstreet
Boys (I entered first grade in 1970 – I’m right on the cusp between the last
of the Baby Boomers and the first of Gen-X’ers, depending on which
social scientist is doing the counting). But I basically had that same, blank stare, “give me a minute to think” reaction to teen heartthrob TV and movie stars, which, like the boy bands of the 1990s and early Naughts, were heavily packaged romantic properties.And it never even occurred to me to think about which women I thought were attractive, because, growing up in an even more heteronormative generation than now, no one thought to ask my opinion on them. But if they had, I would would have had to stare and shrug and think a minute…
You must be logged in to post a comment.