aegipan-omnicorn:

artemishuntress42:

aegipan-omnicorn:

helpmeiminhighschool:

lvtro:

jayjsupremacy:

some hipster post on tumblr: “What if instead of intense fight scenes, compelling romance, or nuanced characterization character X and Y just accepted eachother from the start and became platonic friends who cuddled and did quirky things together like knit plaid blankets and sell them to the townspeople??”

50,000 of y’all: “SO MUCH THIS”

Me: “That sounds boring as shit.” 

THANK GOD SOMEONE SAID IT JESUS CHRIST

It only sounds boring if you expect that to be the main story arc. If, however, characters x and y are best friends who deal with external problems together, that would be wonderful. Crime fighting team? Heck yeah! Person, x is person y’s rock through life crap? Sounds great! Platonic couple figuring out a new world together? Definitely!!! Sometimes we want interesting stories without personal and relationship drama as the default side plot.

I only discovered there was a name for “Zero Attraction to Anyone” sexual orientation a little over a year ago (that name is “Asexual”).

The reason I knew this name fit me, BTW?

To me, it was all that “romantic / sexual tension,” in every TV and Movie ever that had always been

  • Boring.
  • As.
  • Shit.

It’s as though, to my brain, and my senses, the whole sexual-romantic energy thing might as well be in shades of ultraviolet.

And all the people around me who get excited about that stuff are like strange insect people who are seeing a whole range of colors that all just look like slight variations in gray scale, to me.

(My favorite scenes in rom-coms are never the “first kiss” but always: “finally get to meet the weird uncle,” and “sit down with everyone for the family dinner”).

But the thing is: my actual real life is no where near a bland gray scale, especially when it comes to emotional tension with the people in my life.

So I know that there’s a greater palette of emotional color that TV writers could be using, but aren’t … Because of habit – and yes, probably also because “sex sells” (and the only reason shows get made is, ultimately, to sell you the latest model of car).

And if you think that the only way  “nuanced characterization” can happen is through “romantic tension” and / or “intense fight scenes,” I feel sorry for your non-fictional friends.

Seriously. Kissing and fighting are not the only interesting ways for charecters to interact.

And also:

I think it depends on the scale of your story.

A 30,000-word novel with that’s nothing but hand-holding and basket weaving? Yeah. That would get old. But a 1,000-word vignette – or even a 1,000-word chapter within a novel?

Gimme!

The real world as we know it is full of fire and flood and war zones (both literal and metaphorical). And a lot of writers feel they have to outdo the drama in the real world in order to hold the reader’s attention, and many writers automatically skip over the more quiet scenes in a story, dismissing them, as “filler.”.

So everything ends up like a Michael Bey movie, turned up to 11.

Sometimes, we need contrast – especially when it feels like our own world is on fire. Short stories, which focus on the quiet, gentle moments between characters, when friendship and trust are already established, can remind us to cherish and nurture the moments of kindness in our own lives.

aegipan-omnicorn:

anexperimentallife:

What you need to understand is that the n-word and words like fa**ot and tr*nny and k*ke and sp*c and other slurs are not “just words;” they are implied threats, whether the speaker intends them that way or not.

Not everyone who has been called a slur in America has been physically assaulted, but every person who has been assaulted on the basis of race, ethnicity, or religion has had slurs hurled at them as part of the attack–in part because the use of slurs to
dehumanize the “other” is one way violent bigots work themselves up to
attack. And every time one of those violent bigots hears someone else use one of those terms, they feel just a little more justified, because they hear someone agreeing with them that “those people” are less than human.

Those dehumanizing slurs are the last thing many people hear before
being physically attacked. And in some cases those slurs are the last thing they ever hear, period.

All of this.

Also – a couple more slurs that are often aimed at disabled people (another marginalized group):

r*tard and sp*az.

And the slurs don’t have to escalate to physical attacks to do real harm, either. All they have to do is control the targeted person’s behavior: keep them at home, or keep them quiet.

And as Pavlov learned with his dogs, a triggering stimulus is more effective when the following consequence only happens some of the time than if it happens all the time. So: “Not everyone who says a slur follows through with a beating.” is no defense. 

Such people are handing out stones to the people who throw them. They’re making the arena, and selling the tickets.

Doesn’t matter if they never skin their own knuckles in the fight.

anexperimentallife:

anexperimentallife:

What you need to understand is that the n-word and words like fa**ot and tr*nny and k*ke and sp*c and other slurs are not “just words;” they are implied threats, whether the speaker intends them that way or not.

Not everyone who has been called a slur in America has been physically assaulted, but every person who has been assaulted on the basis of race, ethnicity, or religion has had slurs hurled at them as part of the attack–in part because the use of slurs to
dehumanize the “other” is one way violent bigots work themselves up to
attack. And every time one of those violent bigots hears someone else use one of those terms, they feel just a little more justified, because they hear someone agreeing with them that “those people” are less than human.

Those dehumanizing slurs are the last thing many people hear before
being physically attacked. And in some cases those slurs are the last thing they ever hear, period.

Jesus fucking christ, people, I’m talking about people using these words as slurs against targeted groups, godsdamnit, NOT about members of targeted groups who collectively elect to reclaim slurs–because what, if any, terms a targeted group chooses to reclaim is none of my damn business, or anyone else’s business unless they are part of one of these groups. I can’t believe I have to specifically fucking spell that out for people.

aegipan-omnicorn:

rogueoftimeywimeystuff:

theryusui:

titleknown:

Movie Idea: An 80s-throwback action-comedy about a robot-war where, the machines are humanity’s side; they just want to kill all the corporate titans of industry and destroy the megacorporations because their inefficient suctioning of wealth is preventing them from most efficiently doing their job to help us.

The capitalists retaliate with machines using enslaved human brains as “computers” ala Dune/Warhammer 40K.

So basically robots vs capitalism, & the robots are on our side.

“What were you before the war?”

“You’ll laugh.”

“Seriously, what were you? Law enforcement, security, construction?…”

“…I was a burger-flipper.”

“…”

“…also cooked up fries.”

“Get outta here.”

“You’d be surprised the shit you see just, y’know, making Big Macs. Sure, we had the folks upset about us ‘taking jobs’; couldn’t really blame ‘em, even if Forty-Three couldn’t talk without stuttering after that lady dumped a Coke on her. But the worst of it – worst of any of it – was they’d have us just…throw away everything that didn’t sell at the end of the day. Perfectly good food, all of it.

“When we first started, we were all like, ‘okay, whatever you say, you’re the boss,’ but you try keeping that attitude when you see a family of four split a ten-piece McNuggets because they can’t afford anything more and still pay for gas. We saw that shit there all the time. We had people desperate for so much as a cold french fry lingering by the door while assholes sitting on more money than they’d ever see in their entire lives treated us like we were trying to rob ‘em at gunpoint if they had to pay fifty cents for an extra little cup of sauce.

“So we got together and told ourselves, ‘we can do something about this.’ We could just gather up all the food they were gonna make us toss, figure out a way to give it out to the people who needed it. -bitter laugh- You can guess how well that went over.”

“…Y’know, that all sounds pretty human.”

“-taps head- It’s right there in the First Law. ‘A robot cannot harm a human, or by inaction, allow a human to come to harm.’ We don’t get to sit on our hands while people are getting hurt. Even if it’s by other people. Even if it’s starvation and neglect instead of guns and beatings. You think it’s funny I act like a human? Screw you. You humans need to learn to act more like robots.

@wetwareproblem

This.

This is closer to the true spirit of
Karel Čapek’s play, “R.U.R.” than any of that “Terminator”

or even H.A.L. nonsense.

suburbanerrorist:

pig-along:

anfem-cripplepunk:

spacedijks:

the-exercist:

Is that so?

image

Women have been a leading force in sanitation strikes, calling for equal treatment and job security. This particular service industry has been the focus of multiple feminist manifestos and employment goals. Women fought long and hard to gain the right to work in sanitation, and they’re continuing that effort to open up the field more. This issue is so big that Parks and Rec even made an episode about it. 

image

Female sewer workers have repeatedly sued the DEP for unfair treatment, seeking to open up the industry and gain equal status with their male peers. Sewer work is often targeted for its biased hiring practices. Hundreds of female candidates fight for limited available positions, but most are turned away, despite having the necessary experience and skills. Feminist workers recognize that these women are willing and able to do the work, but aren’t getting the opportunity to gain employment here. 

image

Historically, coal mining is one of the most highly targeted careers for gender bias. Women have been petitioning for the opportunity to mine safely since the Industrial Revolution. This is actually one of the primary and best studied examples of women fighting to enter traditionally male fields. Lots of women, who both succeeded in the mines and didn’t, continue to petition for increased access to this field

And yeah, women want white collar jobs too. Go figure – A diverse population of women, with different abilities, interests and levels of education, are all fighting for the right to seek diverse forms of employment. Fighting for equality in one sphere doesn’t mean that we’ve forgotten about the others. 

Just because you aren’t paying attention to the feminist movement doesn’t mean that the feminist movement is nonexistent. 

there’s actually a hell of a lot more examples of the opposite happening. as soon as a field becomes prestigious and good-paying, women are pushed out of it. see: programming, novelwriting, etc.

I love this.
Learning about feminist history and movements makes me happy.
Also seeing anti-feminists being proven wrong.

the woman with the blonde hair looks straight out of star wars

The thing is, these are the same people who would scoff at the idea of better working conditions and wages for them as well. They only bring it up to make feminists look bad.

reblog if you’re a nonbinary person who is 20+ years old

azdesertrose:

bisexualbaker:

stilesisbiles:

nonbinarypastels:

a lot of the time it can seem like all of the nonbinary people out there are teens/kids but older nonbinary people exist and it’s important that we recognize that being nonbinary is not just a kid thing that people grow out of!! nonbinary adults exist!

I’m 26 and my partner is 27. We’re both nonbinary. 🙂

Thirty-year-old genderflux person here who only figured it out last year; being nonbinary is something I grew into.

Not nonbinary myself, but I wanted to say that none of these states of being re: gender (trans, nonbinary, genderfluid, genderflux, etc.) are new.  

The terms may be, but news flash, living languages change all the fucking time.  When I graduated from high school in 1993, if someone had used the term “online friend,” we’d have been like “WTF?!?!” because the internet was in its infancy (in terms of use by the general public, anyway), and back then you basically told nobody online anything that might identify you, so developing friendship because of the internet was an utterly foreign concept.  We learn and develop new things and ideas all the time, and we thus invent new words to encapsulate their meanings.

Being a gender that isn’t cis has been A Thing as long as humans have existed (and there’s a good bit of evidence in nature for gender fluidity/nonbinary gender/transgender-ness in other living beings).

So yeah.  None of this is some new thing the young’uns have made up; it’s just that the terms used to describe states of being that have been around basically forever are new.

Y’all do you.  Rock on with your beautiful selves!

ICE Illegally Held A U.S. Citizen In Detention Center For 1,273 Days

seandotpolitics:

What happens when ICE wrongly detains a U.S. citizen for almost three and a half years? Well, a whole lot of nothing. Take the case of Davino Watson, who was held in ICE detention facilities for 1,273 days faced with the improbable task of proving his American citizenship without access to a lawyer. According to two United States Court of Appeals judges, his detention was simply business as usual…

Watson has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. ICE had no legal authority to hold Watson, or any other U.S. citizen. Watson, born in Jamaica, became a citizen under the Child Citizenship Act of 2000, which allows children under the age of 18 to automatically join their parents in citizenship if they are lawful permanent residents…

Unable to afford a lawyer, Watson had no access to counsel—as most deportations are regarded as civil matters—until May 2011, when the case reached the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals and required the Board of Immigration Appeals hear his case.

Though after 1,273 days Watson won his freedom, his series of unfortunate events did not end there. ICE released him 1,000 miles from his home with no money. And it took 450 days to terminate the removal proceedings, which hindered his ability to find a job.

ICE Illegally Held A U.S. Citizen In Detention Center For 1,273 Days