OKAY
Can we address the fact that people with good parents get super offended when you explain how awful yours were? Saying things like “your parents would do anything for you”, or “you’re lucky they gave you a roof. Be grateful”. Nope. No you are not going to guilt me into thinking abuse was okay just because they met the basic requirements for the care of a child.
It’s wonderful that your parents are great and would do anything for you. But that statistic does not apply to every parent, and it’s so invalidating and dangerous to imply that, so stop. Think, really deeply think about what I’m saying and why.
Totally agree that victim-shaming is disgusting and never okay!!!!
But just an important heads-up: people who get defensive, i.e. uncomfortable, in any way when you tell them about your abusive parents, are abused themselves without knowing it.
Someone who REALLY had good parents would have absolutely no reason to get angry at you for venting about your abuse. Why should they?
The only explanation for people saying things like this is that it makes them extremely uncomfortable, because it forces them to look at their own parents. Another person’s abuse always triggers an emotional flashback to your own abuse. For example, if someone complains how their parents got angry at them for crying, it would immediately make them think/feel of how they feel when they cry, i.e. what their parents taught them about crying through their reaction to them crying.
I know it’s a really unknown fact that most people suffer from emotional abuse, but it really is part of our culture. How people react to your trauma is a good way of telling how much they know about their own trauma (not saying that people who react compassionately to you aren’t traumatised – they either have experience in this (which might stem from their own abuse too!) and/or they already know about their own trauma. Only asking them directly will of course give you the truth.).
But yeah – people with good parents don’t say such things. It sounds like they are just repeating what their own abusive parents would say.
Day: November 23, 2018
Is Xochipilli really the patron god of gay people in Aztec mythology?
Off the top of my head, I can’t really say for sure. His chapter in Book 1 of the Florentine Codex makes no mention of homosexuality.
https://tlatollotl.tumblr.com/post/155087204891/book-1-the-gods-fourteenth-chapter
And if I recall correctly, the Aztecs did not embrace homosexuality and saw it as wrong. There is a section in Book 10, I think, which condemns hermaphrodites and/or cross dressers. So, to have a patron deity of homosexuals would seem to contradict Aztec beliefs.
That being said, we have to examine our sources of information. What are they? The Florentine Codex, while being in Spanish and Nahuatl and consulting Aztec nobility, is an early Spanish colonial document produced by a Spanish friar. One look at the appendices to Book 1, for example, you can see how Sahagun later went back and made notes condemning the beliefs of the Aztecs as devil worshipers despite making an effort to record what they, themselves, have to say. So there is definitely this religious and cultural bias coming from Sahagun as well as any other Spaniard who may have written about Aztec beliefs.
But, what about things written by the Aztecs themselves after contact? We have to be careful with those, as well. The surviving nobility were very much playing politics after the conquest of Tenochtitlan. They were defeated by the Spanish and their allies and needed to cooperate in order to survive. So while they may have helped Sahagun and others in recording information, they may have already begun rejecting their own beliefs if it contradicted the beliefs of their conquerors.
It’s not a very satisfactory answer and I apologize. When the semester is over, I will try and look more in depth into this topic for you. I can’t really do that now because I have projects and papers due in the next two weeks. However, if someone else knows more on the subject, please chime in.

[ tweet by Ruth H. Hopkins
As you celebrate thanksgiving, know that the Trump administration is taking away 321 acres of land from the Mashpee-Wampanoag, the tribe that helped the pilgrims survive and were present at the first thanksgiving. Tell legislators to support the Mashpee Reservation Reaffirmation Act. ]
For those who don’t live in Massachusetts, that is literally ALL THE LAND THEY HAVE! All of it. The state aims to make the entire ~3000 person tribe homeless.
Goddamn, I didn’t realize that the Mongols conquered as far as Gaza. That’s astonishing.
It seems most likely then that the Mongols raided Palestine by themselves in 1299–1300. The Mongol forces rode as far as Gaza, looting and killing as they went, and they entered several towns, including Jerusalem. In the end, all the raiders returned to the Damascus area… by the middle of March 1300.
Palestinians just can’t catch a break, can they.
If my time machine deposited me at one of the big crossroads of history (anatolia, the levant, northern india, etc.), you can bet your ass I’d be making a beeline out of there as fast as the nearest horse could carry me. Go be a reindeer herder on the Kola Peninsula or something; the *last* place I’d want to live in the past is anywhere remotely interesting.
haha yeah wait what you have a time machine
going back to see Florence at the height of the Renaissance sounds like fun until you remember that even those city states were perpetually attacking each other.

Please reblog this even if you don’t care
They’re trying to erase the existence of the rape victims of Japanese soldiers in World War II because they think the reminder of their crimes might make Japan a little bit cross
Duterte, the absolute coward, is more worried about women criticizing him than actually honoring the women this country needs to remember
Please don’t let these women be silenced.













You must be logged in to post a comment.