askmissbernadette:

writing-prompt-s:

You live in an alternate world where twins—fraternal and identical—can feel each other’s physical pain. You are an only child with no siblings. One day, suddenly, you feel a burning pain in your chest.

It’s called heartburn, learn to eat slower you hooligans

Feds Find Fewer States Meeting Special Ed Obligations

karnythia:

aka14kgold:

blackraincloud:

autisticadvocacy:

Less than half of states are meeting their obligations to appropriately serve students with disabilities

If only “juvenile detention exists” and “poverty” were considered hostile learning environments…

Anyway, 22 out of 50 seems high. Like, I’m familiar with how low the bar is, and that still sounds high.

Virginia passes the test, but Southern Niece #1, who lives in Virginia’s wealthiest county/school district (one of the wealthiest in the country, in fact, and also one of the best), has been homeschooled for 2 ½ years now because the district can’t manage to place her anywhere that meets two basic requirements: 1) she isn’t placed in physically violent situations, and 2) she receives at least two hours of classroom time where her not-particularly-severe learning disabilities and not-at-all-uncommon psychological-behavioral issues are accommodated/not punished. 

Even then, I’m sure the district passes – sure,

we can’t place a kid with Tourette’s anywhere that she doesn’t end up being traumatized by violence, despite having 150 elementary schools serving 100k students, but hey! We tried a couple times!

There is no bar. None. IEPs may as well not exist for the most part. Accommodation requires multiple people – and taxpayers in general – to give a shit about someone who isn’t them, and that’s a pipe dream. In any case, technically everyone should fail, because starvation begets hostile learning environments and now we’re trying to take away free school lunches. 

My state combined the special ed funds with general funding & immediately acted like having to provide services to my kid was a burden. You don’t want to know how many people I have had to curse smooth the fuck out at his IEP meetings. This year they said in the meeting that his autism makes any bullying he receives his fault because of his limited social skills. I almost jumped over the table. States are literally pushing the idea that kids with IEP’s are greedily hogging the funding that they deserve to meet their needs & it is maddening. 

Feds Find Fewer States Meeting Special Ed Obligations

eatingcroutons:

pointless-letters:

leather-gremlin:

geekandmisandry:

pointless-letters:

Meanwhile, over on Twitter…..

Haunted Ventriloquist Dummy.

Heyo not to derail this but you know who pays tuition fees by and large?

The people who will never get access to them.

The rich sure as hell isn’t upping their tax rate to cover this which is what these tweets were originally about. But without the other side of the coin by showing where that money is actually coming from then its bad activism. You know where this money comes from? Austerity!

So in demanding your tuition be covered you’re literally taking money, food, healthcare and shelter away from the most vulnerable people in society. Every marginalised person suffers for your tuition when they will forever be denied access to the same privileges you seek. Its literally killing people.

The only time economics are seen to be bad are when they affect the middle class. The poor, the nonwhite, the lgbtqia, the disabled and every other marginalised group gets shat on in boom or bust. But when things get hard the middle class start to feel a tiny part of the lower classes daily lives and then use their significant political influence to get what they need while ignoring where it comes from.

The rich are too powerful to touch and the middle class use the power to have to meet their own needs while shielding themselves from who they truly hurt. The poor.

I completely agree that some groups of people in the U.K. are feeling the impact of an ideologically-driven austerity far more than others, and the burden is not falling on those with the broadest shoulders. I know this makes me sound a bit naive, but the UK is the fifth largest economy in the world. We have enough money to properly look after people *and* make education accessible to as many people as want it without saddling those people with debt for the rest of their working lives. I’d like to see us do both.

Speaking of class, though, and specifically about university education, the Independent reported in December that there was a record gap between rich and poor students winning university places. They also reported that the number of poor students attending leading U.K. universities was dropping. The Telegraph reported recently that the number of poor students dropping out of university is at its highest level for 5 years. I was a working class kid from a working class family (spare me my life from this monstrosity!) and I took is for granted that if I wanted to go to Uni I could, and as it turns out when I did leave school I did go to university. I don’t think the same options would be open to me today.

But yeah, the money is there, I’d just like to see it spent better. More services, more access, more opportunity. Give me libraries and colleges and universities over aircraft carriers that don’t have any aircraft on them any day of the week.

“They also reported that the number of poor students attending leading U.K. universities was dropping.”

I studied at a top UK university. One of my best mates there was from a comprehensive in North London. Even fifteen years ago, when tuition fees were a fraction of what they were today, he knew several mates from his school who were academically brilliant but had been put off university when they’d seen the amount they’d have to pay. 

In 2004 we protested against raising fees to £3000 a year because we knew it would turn even more kids away. Yeah, financial aid is available, but as my mate explained at the time the idea of racking up 

£12k in debt from a four-year degree is fucking terrifying when that’s more than one of your parents makes in a year.

And now maintenance grants have been scrapped, and top universities can ask for 

£9250 a year, and unsurprisingly this is having the biggest impact on access to university for those from poorer backgrounds. The gap between rich and poor access to university is the biggest it’s ever been, and growing.

@leather-gremlin this doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game between education and social welfare – the current conservative government just chooses to portray it that way. There are other places to raise revenue and cut costs. 

Access to both social welfare and education are fundamentally necessary to support a just society.

silks-stuff:

benignmilitancy:

yardsards:

I hate it when people say technology is taking away kids’ childhoods
If anything, it’s actually giving kids more of an opportunity to let their imagination out

A lot of times when I let kids play on my phone, they go for the drawing app.
I watched a girl on the bus write a silly poem about her friends and then laugh as she made Siri read it
I hear children say to their friends “hey, FaceTime me later” because they still want to talk face to face even when they’re far away.
I see kids sitting, who would feel lonely and ignored if it weren’t for the fact that they’re texting their friends who are far away.
Children still climb trees. They might just take a selfie from the top to show off how high they’ve gotten.
They can immediately read the next book of their favorite series on their Kindles.
Most kids would still be up for a game of cops and robbers. Or maybe they’d google rules to another game they haven’t played yet.
When children wonder why the sky is blue, they don’t get an exasperated “I don’t know” from tired adults. They can go on Wikipedia and read about light waves and our atmosphere.
They show off the elaborate buildings they created on Minecraft.

Technology isn’t ruining childhoods, it’s enhancing them.

Love this post so much to counteract much of the pessimism surrounding technology and kids. It’s not stealing kids’ innocence, just another means of expressing it. And so often do I hear that all kids do these days is “play on their phones” instead of doing other things, it’s starting to sound like a broken record. >.>

Heck, it reminds me of the first time our family got a computer; sure, I was on it all the time, but it afforded me a chance to talk more often with my best friend at the time. It filled in that boredom that would have otherwise been filled with TV and made me curious about the world.

Technology doesn’t ruin kids. Society does.