Even when you are legitimately suffering, it is your
responsibility not to be cruel to people who haven’t harmed you. When
you are miserable and feel like lashing out, it’s your responsibility to
control that impulse and to apologize when you fail to control that
impulse.
Sometimes people think their suffering gives them the
right to be as vicious as they like, and that viciousness often lands on
the very people trying to offer them support and care. Someone who
cares about you and who is trying to support you isn’t there to be your
verbal (or physical) punching bag.
There’s a difference between
consensual support – sharing your feelings with someone who has agreed
to listen – and taking out those feelings on someone by saying cruel
things to them, hurting them physically, or making them feel bad intentionally to excise your own
feelings.
If you are the person offering care to someone who
is suffering, you are not required to accept cruelty in order to offer
support. You are entitled to set boundaries that keep you from being
hurt – even when the other person is also legitimately hurting.
Sometimes
people who are suffering get overwhelmed and lash out, because it can be
hard to think of others sometimes when your own pain is great. But if
and when this happens, it needs to be acknowledged and apologized for,
and the person who did it needs to figure out how to stop themselves
from behaving like this in the future. The person who was lashed out at is also entitled to their own feelings about what happened; no one’s required to excuse or ignore their pain just because it was inflicted on impulse or by someone else who was in pain.
No one gets a pass on
harming whoever’s nearest just because they themselves have been
harmed. If someone is consistently treating you with respect, it’s not
acceptable to force them to bear the brunt of pain you received
somewhere else. Find other ways to handle overwhelming feelings.
For years, I have been writing on Twitter about the impact of legislation on sex workers, which is to say, on my community. Sometimes people pay attention, sometimes strangers write to me about it, sometimes I get threats and name-calling.
But never have I faced on the internet the kind of vitriol or the kind of frighteningly zealous support as I have since I told a family story online last week about Bernie Sanders behaving less-than-perfectly-progressive toward my mother some time in the early ’80s
The response to the tweet was overwhelming. As it turns out, people care a lot more about whether or not Bernie Sanders might have said something mildly sexist 35 years ago to a “porn star’s mom” — as a Newsweek story about my tweet put it — than they do about whether sex workers live or die.
Even after many years of living in the world as a sex worker, after the deaths of so many friends and coworkers — some of them uninvestigated and unreported, others followed by online comments like “good thing she’s dead” — the passion with which people will apply themselves to protecting (or destroying) the reputation of a politician, while ignoring the impact of legislation he supports, still surprises me.
Sanders, along with 96 other Senators, passed H.R. 1865, also known as FOSTA-SESTA (or just SESTA) on March 21. On April 11, Trump signed the bill into law. SESTA removes protections in section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to create new civil and criminal liability for “anyone who owns, manages, or operates” a website “with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person.” The law does not clarify what this means. Is warning other sex workers about dangerous clients (as workers have done online for many years) facilitating prostitution? What about sharing safety and health information with sex working people? How many harm-reduction tactics are now against federal law? How will the owners, managers, and operators of social media and other communications websites respond to this, and what impact will that have on already-marginalized people?
For months before this law passed, my friends and I wrote to reporters, we tweeted and posted to Instagram and called our representatives and made as much noise as we could. It seemed obvious that this legislation would be devastating to the safety of our loved ones, and had the potential to cut all of us off from each other by making us a liability to websites that facilitate the everyday online forms of communication everyone has come to rely on. When the bill passed the Senate, our predictions came immediately true.
There has been other impact as well: reports of an increase in sex workers working outdoors, and stories about friends who have gone missing or harmed themselves. A friend had her bank account frozen. Another friend said that though she’d had plans to leave the adult industry, the hostility of the current climate had convinced her she would not be able to do any other kind of work. This impact is widespread and has hit folks whose work was criminalized as well as those doing legal forms of sex work such as stripping and working in adult film.
Bernie Sanders praising Cardi B after voting for SESTA is every ex I’ve had who brought me to a few parties, but wouldn’t let me even be seen in the vicinity of their parents or their boss. Every sex worker I know has exes like this.
At marches and demonstrations, my friends and I have spent so much time shouting. We’ve spent so much time writing letters, calling legislative staff, talking to journalists, showing up at administrative and legislative hearings. We’ve spent so much time being unheard by anyone, from any political party. Equally vehement in the messages I’ve received in the last 48 hours are ones from folks who think my story demonstrates some allegiance to Hillary Clinton or the DNC. Apparently there is a thing called donut twitter and something else called rose twitter, and the 2016 democratic primary is still alive on the internet as though all of this were about gaining and losing points in some ongoing adversarial sport.
Sex work, however, is not a partisan issue. Sex workers are equally hated by the right and the left. Conservatives and liberals and socialists alike have supported policies that have led to the deaths of sex workers. Nonetheless, sex workers hold beliefs across the political spectrum. We continue to vote for people who are demonstrably flawed. We vote for people who we know do not like us. We vote for people who are imperfect, and then we call them on the phone, we show up at their rallies and at their offices and demand that they become the representatives that we need them to be.
We know that they are flawed and we believe, still, that one day they will hear us.
There’s so much charter school money to be made if your gimmick is cruelty to black children “for their own good.”
Well this is enraging.
Update: “[the superintendent] believed if given the right conditions, these Black and Brown kids could excel and compete with the best. They have. In order to achieve this, stringent rules and regulations were developed,” Dearborn wrote.
This has proven time and again not to work. Students learn best when there is mutual trust and respect with teachers and staff.
Wow I’m even more enraged.
I knew before I even finished the tweet this was Noble. They have such a trash fire reputation for this bullshit.
Fuck charters. I don’t care if there are a few good ones. The system is designed to profit off of children by any means possible, including their dehumanization.
This was all over Twitter last night and the menstruation thing is pretty terrible, but what I couldn’t get over was that the teachers in this school could go into a hallway in between class periods and yell “HANDS UP!!” and the kids were supposed to *put their hands up and be silent*.
A bunch of Black teenagers. In their school. Being told to raise their hands by white instructors.
Unconscionable.
This kind of thing seems to be common in this type of school. In one academy (the British equivalent of a charter school), the school handbook said that kids who felt unwell would be given a bucket instead of permission to leave the room.
Great Yarmouth parents slam strict rules at failing academy
every cat exists on a sliding scale of ‘unit’ to ‘goblin’ with exotic longhairs and oriental shorthairs both being on the extreme yet opposite ends of the spectrum
shoutout to @archangelpng for creating & submitting this explosive take
Hi everyone, my name is Gemma and I could really use your help to eat, this coming month. Is anyone may be able to send me £20 or even £5 so I can buy myself food/essentials for today and tomorrow? Or a little bit more to help me until the end of May(25th) when my benefit will be reinstated.
**I know that I’ve made this post before but, I’ve had to remake it as my last one was embarrassingly long and received a lot of notes but I’m still really struggling to get groceries/toiletries and general household supplies (laundry powder, dish soap etc..) as my benefit has been sanctioned and reassessed due to a Work Capability Assessment (WCA) and is pending appeal and I won’t receive any financial aid until May(25th).
*my local council, food banks, and churches aren’t able to assist me anymore*
I also understand that everyone is struggling, but even just £1/$1/€1 makes such a difference. I could really use all the help I can possibly get and sharing definitely helps just as much a donations and nobody has to donate if they can’t or don’t want to, thank you so, so much🙏💖
You must be logged in to post a comment.