futurecatladies:

gemmarosity:

gemmarosity:

i cant believe americans on tv really say rock paper scissors like???? its paper scissors rock omg do u irl americans actually say rock paper scissors????

rb this with whether u say paper scissors rock or rock paper scissors

me normally: linguistic differences are so interesting and cool! I love hearing different dialectal variations.

me, reading “paper, scissors, rock” with my own two eyeballs: the lord is testing me

Trump violated the Constitution when he blocked his critics on Twitter, a federal judge rules

atalantapendrag:

President Trump’s decision to block his Twitter followers for their
political views is a violation of the First Amendment, a federal judge
ruled Wednesday, saying that Trump’s effort to silence his critics is
not permissible under the U.S. Constitution because the digital space in
which he engages with constituents is a public forum.

The ruling
rejects administration arguments that the First Amendment does not
apply to Trump in this case because he was acting as a private
individual. In a 75-page decision, Judge Naomi Buchwald said Trump, as a
federal official, is not exempt from constitutional obligations
to refrain from “viewpoint discrimination.”

“No
government official — including the President — is above the law,” wrote
Buchwald for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York.

Under the ruling, Buchwald did not order
Trump to unblock his followers, saying that a finding that clarifies the
law is sufficient to resolve the dispute. Should Trump ignore the
ruling, analysts say, future litigation could force Twitter to unblock
Trump’s followers unilaterally.

Trump violated the Constitution when he blocked his critics on Twitter, a federal judge rules

girlfriendluvr:

my gf’s 1 yr old niece was eating chips (which the kid correctly referred to as pringles) and her mom was like “eat your hot dog, not just the pringles” and she just started calling the chips hot dogs instead. she keeps pointing to the chips and saying “hot dog” and whenever her mom or grandpa says “no those are chips” she insists “HOT DOG.” power move

corvusvulpes:

clatterbane:

screambirdscreaming:

So I just learned something that pisses me off.
Y’know quinoa? The ~magical~ health food that has become so popular in the US that a centuries-long tradition of local, sustainable, multi-crop farming is being uprooted to mass-produce it for the global market? Potentially affecting food stability and definitely effecting environmental stability across the region?

Ok, cool.

Y’know Lamb’s Quarter? A common weed throughout the continental US, tolerant of a wide variety of soil conditions including the nutrient-poor and compacted soils common in cities, to the point where it thrives in empty lots?

These plants are close relatives, and produce extremely similar seeds. Lamb’s quarter could easily be grown across the US, in people’s backyard and community gardens, as a low-cost and local alternative to quinoa with no sketchy geopolitical impacts. You literally don’t have to nurture it at all, it’s a goddamn weed, it’ll be fine. Put it where your lawn was, it’ll probably grow better than the grass did. AND you can eat the leaves – they taste almost exactly like spinach. 

This just… drives home, again, that a huge part of the appeal of “superfoods” is the sense of the exotic. For whatever nutritional benefits quinoa does have, the marketing strategy is still driven by an undercurrent of orientalism. You too could eat this food, grown laboriously by farmers in the remote Andes mountains! You too could grow strong on the staple crop that has sustained them for centuries! And, y’know, destroy that stable food system in the process. Or you could eat this near-identical plant you found in your backyard. 

What makes this even weirder and more frustrating, to quote my commentary on an older post about growing your own quinoa and amaranth? Growing native North American species instead is really not a new idea. Native people have already domesticated and grown these crops extensively, for thousands of years.

Another good option there, if you’re in North America: a native species very similar to quinoa, which will grow well in a much wider variety of climates, from Mexico to Northern Canada. People still grow it in Mexico, and it has been cultivated from the Eastern Agricultural Complex to the Rockies, and beyond. You grow it like the closely related quinoa, but it will literally grow like a weed in such a wide variety of climates. And doesn’t have the potential to turn into an invasive weed like quinoa could. Because it’s probably already growing in the vicinity. In fact, if you are living in an area where it used to be grown extensively, most of the wild plants of it now are probably actually an old larger-seeded domesticated variety. It was that common a crop in many places.

You can easily do a search for seed sources. There are also a number of native North American amaranth species which have a long history of cultivation and domestication in a lot of regions, so you might also want to check those out instead for similar reasons. There is likely at least one native species that will grow better in your area, without the risk of becoming invasive. While being every bit as good to eat as the types imported from South America.

The low value placed on and resulting poor common knowledge about many, many indigenous North American crops has helped drive the destructive demand for nearly identical “exotic” foods from South America. We don’t have to continue these patterns.

Although lamb’s quarter leaves should be cooked or eaten sparingly raw  because they are toxic if consumed in large quantities raw. 

Good addition, thanks. A little more info. The concern there is oxalic acid, like with spinach and a number of other greens. Cooking will break it down.

(That link is specifically referring to Chenopodium album and not C. berlandieri, but other species are similar. Including quinoa.)

One example of continuing to agonize over “splurge” purchases from last night, actually, at about the same investment level as those $50 shoes. (If not as obviously useful, though I will still do it with necessities too.)

I had been considering picking up a copy of Skyrim for the Switch for a while, but hadn’t yet. Almost ordered it a couple of times, but stepped back telling myself that the £42 could be better spent on any number of things we actually need.

Last night, I finally said fuck it and went ahead. The immediate partial justification? I needed stuff to treat some unpleasant eczema problem ASAP, which was only available with Prime shipping as an add-on item. (At roughly £3.50, which I tried to put off spending too!) I couldn’t think of other pressing items anyone here needed to bring the total up to at least £20 for shipping purposes. And adding the game would certainly do that 🙄

Still getting intrusive thoughts of doom afterward, of course. But, that mental workaround was enough to get it bought. Ridiculous a workaround as it was.

We can afford a game. My partner doesn’t seem to think twice about buying games. (Or books, or new shoes, or going on trips that he knows he can pay for, or…) Buying myself another Switch instead of just using his wouldn’t pose any huge hardship, for that matter.

Try to tell any of that to Ghost Poverty Brain, though. When I have also been putting off buying basic clothes and shoes.

(In this case, that would also pretty much fall into the “pain management” and “general mental health support” categories. Gaming is a good distraction that I enjoy, with some feeling of accomplishment involved. And I haven’t been able to use the consoles at all for a while now, with the setup not being very accessible for my needs with no obvious easy way to change that. Still feels like a totally frivolous Do Not Need purchase, though.)