Wolves Are Losing Ground to Industrial Logging in Southeast Alaska

rjzimmerman:

Excerpt:

For 12,000 years, wolves have roamed Southeast Alaska’s rugged Alexander Archipelago—a 300-mile stretch of more than 1,000 islands mostly within the Tongass National Forest. Now, their old-growth forest habitat is rapidly disappearing, putting the wolves at risk. As the region’s logging policies garner controversy, a new study examines what the wolves need in order to survive.

Largely isolated from mainland wolves by water barriers and the Coast Mountains, the Alexander Archipelago wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) is widely considered to be a subspecies of gray wolf genetically distinct from other North American populations. In the 1990s and again in 2011, conservationists sought to protect the island wolves under the Endangered Species Act, but the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service denied these petitions—most recently, in January 2016.

Despite their decision not to list the subspecies, in their analysis, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service highlighted Prince of Wales Island as the area of greatest concern for the archipelago wolves, due primarily to impacts of logging and trapping. Bigger than the state of Delaware, Prince of Wales is the largest island in Southeast Alaska and the fourth-largest island in the U.S., after Hawaii, Kodiak Island and Puerto Rico. The island’s lowland hills are blanketed with temperate rainforests of spruce and hemlock and strewn with winding rivers and fjords.

Today, logging roads etch elaborate curlicues into the island’s topography. The extensive road system provides hunters and trappers with easy access to the wolves, which are simultaneously prized for their pelts and regarded as competitors that steal hunters’ deer. According to Roffler, 60 wolves were hunted or trapped last year, 2 illegally. The total number of wolves killed without permits is, of course, impossible to obtain. Roffler said that ADF&G estimated that 231 wolves inhabited Prince of Wales and surrounding smaller islands in the fall of 2017.

Although hunting and trapping have the potential to eradicate wolves in the short-term, habitat loss from logging poses an even greater long-term challenge for wolf survival, said Roffler, whose study of wolves on Prince of Wales was recently published in Forest Ecology and Management. Logging primarily affects wolves by reducing habitat for deer, their primary source of prey. To learn more about which pieces of the fragmented landscape the wolves tend to frequent, Roffler and her team distributed radio collars among 13 wolves in 7 packs. The radio collars transmitted wolf locations for up to two years per animal, allowing unprecedented insight into their movements.

Wolves Are Losing Ground to Industrial Logging in Southeast Alaska

dendroica:

“A bipartisan ballot measure for fairer, more competitive congressional maps in Ohio passed with sweeping support on Tuesday. Around 75 percent of Ohioans voted for Issue 1, compared to 25 percent who voted against it, according to the Associated Press. The measure will keep control of the map-drawing process in the hands of the legislature, but impose new rules requiring 50 percent support from members of both the Democratic and Republican parties for the maps to be enacted. If they fail, a seven-member commission composed of the governor, auditor, secretary of state and lawmakers from the two major political parties will assume control of the process. Importantly, lawmakers are explicitly barred from passing a map that “unduly favors” either party. Other rules dictate that congressional districts must be contiguous and make geographic sense. All together, backers say, these requirements will lead to results that better reflect the will of voters rather than what most benefits the party in power.”

Ohio Voters Pass Anti-Gerrymandering Reform By Huge Margin – Talking Points Memo

mnmpathy:

kenderfriend:

arkhamarchitecture:

edens-blog:

emt-monster:

Please reblog if you know anyone who might take party drugs.

this is so important

Also important information: A cop cannot arrest you for something you already took. You can tell a cop to his face that you just injected black tar heroin in your veins and as long as you don’t currently have any on you (including things like syringes or residue in a pipe), there’s fuck all he can do about it.

I take police reports for a living. The number of people who will happily tell someone “Well officer, this fight started because I smoked crack cocaine earlier,” is astounding and also not at all illegal. The criminal charge is for Possession of a Controlled Substance. If you don’t possess any at the time, there’s no crime. The only thing you can get dinged for is if you’re actively on a drug and driving, in which case – DUI.

Please, please, please tell EMTs what you took. They’re not going to rat you out to the cops and even if they did, you will still be okay.

Spreading the word, being honest with paramedics and doctors can save your life

Hi!! ok so the above information is slightly off. In certain states your body=a container, and therefore you can 100000000% be charged for something in your body.

For example, if someone under 21 is found with alcohol in their blood, since their body is a container in these states they can and will be given an mip.

Know your state laws!! please!!!

naamahdarling:

glumshoe:

When I was ~7 years old, my family went on a guided nature hike in Missouri. We heard a meowing sound and the naturalist assured is that it was a catbird, so named because of its mewing call.

“No,” I said, “That’s an actual cat.”

The naturalist laughed at me when I crouched down and began meowing into the woods. I was always exceptionally good at replicating cat noises – I used to prank people in book and grocery stores by hiding behind shelves and making them think a cat was inside (I stopped doing this by… 13…). So when an actual cat came running to me out of the woods, the naturalist was shocked.

It turned out that the cat belonged to a local family and had been missing and presumed dead for over a week. I lead it back to the park office by meowing at it and then felt like a hero.

That was absolutely heroic, though.  Like, damn.  Good job, baby you!

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

between-stars-and-waves:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

gallusrostromegalus:

thebibliosphere:

finnglas:

thebibliosphere:

wannabanauthor:

sweetfirebird:

If you are a romance writer with the word “Cocky” in one of your titles, and you’ve received a takedown notice from author Faleena Hopkins, please check out this Twitter link on this bullshit. 

Or this one

@thebibliosphere and @caitlynlynch

Have you heard yet? (possibly, it’s all over my FB and twitter)

Oh look,
Faleena is back at her bullshit. One of my friends had her work removed from Amazon and was issued a copyright notice from Hopkins because their plots were “too similar”. The similarities where that their man characters drank red wine, and featured vampires.

She’s on my shitlist for authors to never rec or review.

yeah no it’s super shitty right now.

For the record, if anyone is having issues with her, there are people in publishing volunteering to pay consultation fees with a lawyer right now.

God damn heroes. I think I saw some of them on twitter.

It honest to god makes me want to write something and title it “Cockie” and just do a satirical parody but I have neither the time nor the energy to even pretend to be as shitty a writer or human being as she is. And y’all know me, I don’t make those accusations lightly.

I am both petty and manic right now and I am SORELY tempted to do a quick 2K number about a petty and rude romance author that falls in love with a suave and assertive publisher, only for him to leave her when he finds out what an ass she’s been.

We’ll call it “Cocky Bitch”

Even Anne Rice would say this writer is too litigious

In fact: 

When Anne Rice says “I think your being overzealous in your attitude toward trademark law” that’s like Hunter S Thompson taking you to one side and saying he’s worried about how much you’ve been drinking lately