forthedingoes:

Dingoes (Canis Dingo) are a unique canid species with a wide variety of phenotypical traits, this means physical characteristics like build, colour, ear, leg, tail length, coat colour and length. These ‘types’ of dingoes are distinguishable by people familiar with the species, and can be recognised on sight due to these traits in combination and context. Dingoes are a separate species of canid to dogs, however as canines they share some characteristics that are outside the oldschool ‘rules’ of what a dingo looks like. This leads to confusion and the ambiguity is frustrating and creates a mess of problems. Misinformation is a problem here, but this misinformation is perpetuated by government council bodies, dingo breeders/ sellers, and members of the public who have little to no dingo experience, or with misinformed, rigid ideas of what a dingo should look like. In 2014, dingoes finally had an official taxonomy, which details the biological research undertaken to determine the evolutionary history of dingoes, as well as their physiology pre-invasion day when domestic dogs were brought into the country. 

So, everyone, this is just a post to check out the diversity among dingoes and the interesting ways they have evolved, and their physical/ developmental differences to domestic dogs.

Dingoes have evolved so that their progeny are suited to their environment. In these examples,dingoes born in temperate zones in southern states are on the left, through the coldest seasons (where it reaches up to -10 C in winter) for the first two, then to autumn, spring and summer. The dingoes on the right are found in tropical or arid regions. The sable juveniles in the topmost photo are from K’gari (commonly known as Fraser Island) in tropical Queensland. The dingo below is from far north tropical Queensland. The black dingo below this one is from western Queensland, the one below it found in Southern Australia (which is located in the centre of the country for followers overseas). The last dingo on the right is from the northern territory, near central Australia. 

Now the reason I have included all wild born dingoes in this post is to also bring in the topic of captive bred dingoes. Like these little fluffclouds. These pups are bred in Victoria, in the Dingo Discovery Centre and are a Type categorised as Alpine dingoes which are officially categorised as extinct in the wild. When they grow up, they’ll look like the dingoes you see in zoos.. because this is where 99% of captive kept dingoes have come from. Very few parks, zoos or people looking for a family dingo (”pet”) take on rescues that are wild born, when these animals are specially bred to be suited to domestic life and environments wild dingoes would be unlikely to cope with. You will not find wild dingoes that look or act like them, and visa versa. This is an important issue that needs to be emphasised, because many people see these ones and can’t recognise a dingo in the wild. Or, they will opt to take on a wild born rescue after knowing captive bred dingoes and get a hell of a shock. 

Too much focus is given to coat colour, we’ve established that it is a tiny characteristic which is too ambiguous to rely on alone. What I want to focus on are traits these dingoes share across the species, and have variations of between ‘Types’. Lets start with ears. Dingoes have pricked, rounded ears that do not have the flexibility of a domestic dogs, and will come up from approx 5 weeks of age. However, the length of these ears varies between types, and that in itself influences their rate of growth. Dingoes in cooler climates have slightly smaller ears compared to those in tropical areas. Captive bred Alpine dingoes are much smaller ears than wild dingoes, which naturally mean their ears pop up younger.

Coat length and density is entirely related to their home range, or in the captive bred dingoes case, they are fluffy as hell because Alpines were native to Victorian Alps… and people think they’re cute and will buy them. Wild Dingoes in New England (in New South Wales) deal with some serious cold (it’s like hell froze over, i shit you not), so the dingoes in the first two photos will be a good example of how thick a coat can get to cope with the harshest australian winters. Dingoes in tropical areas can have an undercoat (which drives me insane.. the SHEDDING) and will blow their coat in spring. Dingoes in very hot areas like the the far north, western Qld or central Australia can have a thinner undercoat or a single coat. In arid regions where resources are harder to find, dingoes have longer legs for travelling longer distances than those in forested areas, where it pays to have shorter legs for climbing trees and balancing. Alpines have very short legs which were suited to climbing mountain ranges and having a better grip on the snow.

Common traits found across types of dingoes include hard, angular eyes unlike dogs softer, rounded ones. Their jaw hinges behind the earline, creating a wider gape than dogs, their canines are pronounced and grow longer than the gumline. The teeth are larger in general, and are spaced further apart than a domestic dogs. Looking at a dingo pups teeth, they will look like a dog pups, if they were two to thee times their actual age (this causes confusion when professionals estimate the age of pups, thinking they are domestic puppies). 

Their head is the widest part of their body, and is the same width as their chest, which is always narrow. They do not get dewclaws on their hind legs, only their front, and have rotating wrist joints for added dexterity (seriously, they can open jars and turn doorknobs). Dingoes have a distinct gait and track when they walk, carrying their weight lighter on their paws which stand more upright than dogs. Their shoulder muscles do not bulk outward like dogs, but will dip inwards (making it damn near impossible to find a fitting harness).

Dingo tails sit high, and they have a scent glad which is marked with a dark spot ¾ of the way up their tail, near the base. They have furred bellies, and their tail will develop the bottlebrush shape after they reach 1 – 1.5 years of age. Dingoes are very lean, and cannot digest starches, carbs, fatty meat or fruits/ veggies in their diet. That isn’t to say they won’t eat them if there isn’t any option, but it doesn’t go down well and makes them sick.

They grow at double the rate of domestic puppies, and they are born at the same time, once a year, in winter. They can survive separation and weaning much earlier than dogs, and can survive from 3 weeks old without milk. Most die from culls, either poisoned themselves or from starvation, exposure or predators. Surviving dingoes are independent and mature at 4 months, and will stop growing at 15 months. Their coat will continue to change, and will typically lighten with age. Pups are born darker, with most almost black, and very pale pups typically turn white. In stable populations, there is one breeding pair which will inhibit the breeding of their decedents who live in territories extending from their own. Dingoes are highly territorial and do not form flexible social packs like dogs or wolves, but are predominantly solitary. They form strong bonds with mates, and will often remain monogamous. Non breeding females will sometimes nurse and cooperatively raise pups within a family group, and kin groups will occasionally organise a group hunt on large prey. 

Dingoes are hyperflexible, and can flip their head all the way back to their spine, and hold their legs out at over 90 degrees without pain or injury. Females typically have a ‘mane’ and ridge of longer hair in a dorsal line. Mostly nocturnal, they usually peak their energy at dusk and sleep throughout the day. Dingoes interact with people and dogs very differently to domestic dogs, and these behavioural, vocal and developmental differences are significant, that will have to come in another post. If you’ve read all of this – thank you – I hope you found it interesting. Please let me know if there’s anything you would like me to elaborate on. I have other posts I am working on with more details, but I’m very happy to take requests. 

No, what scares me most is that no accomplished person of sound mind is going to join this snake-pit administration. And those already in the house are distracted by the sniping, the investigations, and the risk that President Trump will turn on them like a bully in the locker room, even loyalists like Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Priebus, the chief of staff who was fired Friday. So, this will get worse. The White House has become a Mad House. The senior ranks of this administration are half-empty today. Of the 575 senior jobs requiring Senate approval, Trump has not yet offered nominees for 357 of them. What type of person will apply now, after watching this tragic comedy? Only the dregs of our public life, people with no reputations to endanger, and no integrity to compromise. People like Anthony Scaramucci. Or, perhaps, Gov. Chris Christie. Keep this in mind, too: Team Trump has yet to face a crisis. All its wounds have been self-inflicted.

miles-thebi:

Love to my bi guys out there being told that their wife/girlfriend/femme aligned partner is actually a “beard”

Love to my bi guys out there being rejecting by gay men because “they’re untrustworthy”

Love to my bi guys out there being forced into a bubble of heteronormativity and societal stereotypes of masculinity

OUTRAGE: Guess What Costs More Than Healthcare for our Trans Troops? Trump’s Golf Trips!

lysikan:

the-real-seebs:

The thing about the “high” costs of trans-related health care is that, while they’re high per person, there’s just plain not enough trans people that they ever become statistically significant parts of the expenses of a large organization.

That has been the whole argument the Trump people have been playing with the medical moneys argument. 

Person X costs much moneys, therefore the thing person X is dealing with is costing EVERYONE those much moneys, as if everyone who isn’t you is person X.
Everyone that isn’t you has cancer and you are paying for it through ACA.
Everyone that isn’t you is pregnant and getting an abortion and you are paying for it through ACA.
Everyone that isn’t you has mental health issues and you are paying for it through ACA.
Everyone that isn’t you is LGBTQ+ is mumble grumble and you are paying for it through ACA (trans health issues, for now) AND it is eroding your right to be a bigot.

I got off track – but that is the theme they are going for. It got them the election and they are playing it up at higher stakes.

And ACA doesn’t make you pay a thing except for insurance premiums that you were not paying because you think you will never get ill so you don’t need insurance. You aren’t paying for my medical bills, you’re investing some moneys for when YOUR medical bills would otherwise wipe you out.

OUTRAGE: Guess What Costs More Than Healthcare for our Trans Troops? Trump’s Golf Trips!

fierceawakening:

earlgraytay:

fierceawakening:

bizarrolord:

dasha-loses-it:

snotstim:

twtransmed:

snotstim:

truscum rhetoric is not only shitty and invalidating of nb folks in general but also really fucking racist as many cultures have multiple genders before your white two gender bullshit. just a note from your local two spirit person

Friendly reminder that cultures do not have the ability to bypass biology and their multiple genders stem from homophobic ideologies.

this makes no sense. how does anything related to gender become homophobic. gender and attraction are separate things. not only that, but binary biology (which isnt the same as gender… also intersex people exist) and gender were only recently created as opposed to nonbinary folks who predate any social structure we have in place now.

love, your local two spirit person

Yeah, because those ancient cultures had no understanding of biology. They also believed that you need to rip out a heart if at least five guys a day in order for the sun to rise next morning.

All those “native genders” are just poorly understood homosexuality and transgenderism and sometimes even outright eunuchs.

Intersex is a rare chromosomal disorder. 99% of the planet does not have it. Statistically, it proves absolutely nothing.

Internet, anesthesia, the theory of a round world, virusology, evolution, space travel – all of these things were discovered very recently yet no one sane doubts them.

Wisdom of the ages is bullshit. Humanity advances faster than ever and we don’t need archaic beliefs anymore.

I agree with this, but the round earth thing was actually discovered by the ancient Greeks, and was well known by Columbus’ time. Columbus thought he could reach India by going in the opposite direction of what was conventional.

I keep seeing this and it confuses me greatly.

What’s the evidence for the claim that “all these native genders are just poorly understood homosexuality?”

I know I’m probably talking out of my arse here, but part of me wonders if it e end matters.

If some people were what we’d call NB in the past, great, but it’s ultimately a modern construct. Just like homosexuality is, lmao.

We can hash out whether or not it’s one with any backing in biology without having to drag our distant ancestors into it.

Is it distant ancestors, though, or is it real world native people who would rather tell us how they see gender identity and gender expression rather than be used to argue everything is homosexuality as the West currently understands it?

Like, my position is “sure, science CAN prove people are wrong about themselves! But please don’t assert that it will instead of waiting until it already has.”

Which is why I asked for evidence–because I haven’t seen proof we’re at that point yet.

No man with undetectable HIV passed on HIV to their partner in study of 343 gay couples

butchcommunist:

During the study, the men participated 17,000 acts of anal sex
without a condom. None of those acts resulted in HIV transmission.

The University of New South Wales’ The Kirby Institute carried out the Opposites Attract study.

‘Undetectable virus level effectively prevents HIV transmission among
gay couples,’ said the Kirby Institute’s Professor Andrew Grulich.

No man with undetectable HIV passed on HIV to their partner in study of 343 gay couples