alanaisalive:

yellow-dress:

teratomarty:

one-angry-liberal:

sonofbaldwin:

The so-called “pro-life” movement’s philosophy.

One of the best political cartoons that I’ve seen. 

You know what pisses me off about this?  Really, REALLY pisses me off?  That’s George (H.W.) Bush holding that umbrella.  He was president 1981-1989.  Do you get that?  

It means that the right have not budged an inch on their ridiculous pro-foetus, anti-actual-persons position in THIRTY GODDAMN YEARS. We should not still be having this argument! Thirty year old political cartoons should be bafflingly opaque, not crystal clear!

^ Reblogging again for that comment.

* He was vice president from 81-89. He was president from 89-93.

That was also not too long after the Republican Party decided they should go anti-abortion at all. And the situation has gotten way worse over the past 30 years.

[Gary] Younge argues that enterprising Republicans were also keen to use the abortion issue to strip Roman Catholic voters from the Democratic Party. In the early 1970s, he points out, both mainstream Republicans like George H. W. Bush and Richard Nixon were pro-choice, and abortion was a non-issue with everyone but Catholic Bishops.

(Revisionist memory: White evangelicals have always been at war with abortion)

Basically, that idea didn’t work out so well–but then the Protestant Religious Right went anti-abortion! And the Republicans spent the ‘80s trying so hard to court that vote. So, here we are now 😩

And once again, I am kind of taken aback by someone expressing surprise that this clip was from 1992. What do some people think was happening in 1992? With a number of things, the Overton window has shifted in some different directions since then than they seem to assume. That’s at least part of it, the best I can tell.

(That’s hardly the only example, but it popped up on my dash again.)

alliecat-person:

blue-face:

actjustly:

Some notes from a talk at the Socialism 2017 conference in Chicago. 

An interview by NPR with Robin Kelley about this topic can be found here.

Hammer and Hoe PDF

Red Chicago PDF

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’m thrilled people are paying attention to Robin Kelley’s work. He’s a brilliant scholar and genuinely nice person who doesn’t get the recognition he deserves outside of the academy.

Out of respect to Professor Kelley, I would ask that people NOT download the PDF of Hammer and Hoe. The book is still in print. The Kindle edition is available on Amazon for $11.33. Used paper copies are available for less than $19. As far as academic history books go this is VERY affordable. He’s a great writer, so I’d say the book is worth this pretty reasonable price.

I understand that some people are not able to pay those prices, but in that case, I would recommend taking the book out at an academic library or requesting it for your local library.

It is disrespectful to Kelley to make his work–the results of YEARS of labor–available for free. Please don’t do this. 

ETA: The same applies to the author of Red Chicago, of course. I talked about Prof. Kelley because I am familiar with him as a scholar and am lucky enough to have talked with him in person a few times, but of course all scholars deserve the same courtesy.

Don’t Take Up Spaces that Aren’t Meant for You

theinfiniteofthought:

urbancripple:

bpdvixon:

urbancripple:

I go to use the elevator in a high rise building only to find a sign that says “Please ask security for access to this elevator”. A week ago, that sign wasn’t there. When I ask the security guard why the sudden change in policy, they said that people from other floors in the building had been abusing their access to the elevator and that they needed to lock it down. 

Let me make this perfectly clear: I could no longer independently access the only elevator available to take me to this part of the building because other people decided to use / abuse a space that was not meant for them instead of taking the stairs right next to the fucking elevator.

Here’s another example: In order to have access to an accessible room on a cruise ship, I have to submit a form stating that I do in fact  have a physical disability that prevents me from using a normal state room on the ship. I have to do this because able-bodied people have, in the past, been dishonest about the level of accessibility they require in order to have access to a larger stateroom without having to pay a premium.

How about this one: I go into the restroom of a massive convention center. Every single stall  in this restroom is empty except for the one handicapped stall in the back, which is being occupied by someone who does not need to use a handicapped stall. I now have to wait for that one person to exit the stall before I can use the restroom. Remember: This bathroom has 7+ other stalls that are built specifically to work for them, but they chose  to use the one space that is available to people like me.

Dear able-bodied people: Handicapped bathroom stalls, seating areas, staterooms, and elevators are not meant for you and you should not use them.

I do not care how big of a hurry you were in and how that elevator got you to where you needed to go faster. Because of you, I have to go find someone every time I need to use this elevator and if I can’t find them I GET NOTHING. 

To you, that cruise ship can house 2000+ people and you have an opportunity to get a massive stateroom at no extra cost if you’re wiling to fib a little. To me, that cruise ship has a capacity of around 12 (the number of accessible rooms on the ship) and if they’re all full, I GET NOTHING.

To you, that movie theater has four really great seats right in the middle that just happen to have a handicapped accessible sign on them. To me, that theater has four seats and if they’re all full, I GET NOTHING.

And let me address the bathroom thing in particular. I don’t give a flying fuck if the handicapped stall was the only one available. You should pretend like it doesn’t fucking exist and wait in line like everyone else. *

Don’t take up spaces that were not meant for you. Because everything but those few precious spaces were not meant for us. 

* Unless it’s literally the only stall in the bathroom or you’re about to absolutely shit yourself. Then it’s fine. 

Story time: I cleaned and stocked portable toilets at a music festival, the main blocks were connected to a really big septic tank but not accessable. The disabled toilets had a tiny tank that would get full very quickly. When not cleaning I would guard the toilet so no one ‘skips the cue’ to use it. When cleaning I couldn’t observe it and it would fill out. The big truck to empty it could not come around to after the day ended, thus people with disabilities would have to either not use to the toilet or find another block and hope that it isn’t filled. No one would understand because ‘noone needs it now’ no they don’t but that’s not the fucking point.

Yes! The “no one needs it right now” thing is the most common excuse I hear about stuff like this. It’s ridiculous.

And just to add some more perspective to this problem, when I park my car in a handicapped space, I purposefully avoid parking in the spaces meant to accommodate wheelchair accessible vans. I don’t need to use that kind of space to get in and out of my car so I don’t use it. That parking space is **not** meant for me.

To be fair though, using a lift instead of stairs is valid in almost all circumstances and I think that is the fault of the building-runners thinking that they should police who uses the lift? Like, not all disabilities are apparent to begin with, but also, someone is just really tired? Or they have a bad knee? Just had a run? Whatever? Let them use the lift

Seriously though, locking up the elevator in a high rise building shows some pretty worrying disregard, right there. It’s there to get people from floor to floor. That’s why it exists. People shouldn’t have to go through security gatekeeping and justify some particular need to use the elevator, for whatever reason.

[In the Hobby Lobby case] technically, the defendants… are the objects themselves, yielding an incredible case name: The United States of America v. Approximately Four Hundred Fifty (450) Ancient Cuneiform Tablets; and Approximately Three Thousand (3,000) Ancient-Clay Bullae.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/hobby-lobby-smuggled-thousands-of-ancient-artifacts-out-of-iraq/532743/

image

(via mswyrr)

This is actually a common naming convention for cases. United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries is an actual Supreme Court case, for example.

(via alx-972)

They’re called in rem cases and as far as I’m concerned every single one of them is a gem name-wise. I’ve personally always been fond of United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins, though United States v. One Tyrannosaurus Bataar Skeleton is pretty great too.

(via literaryreference)

The next time the United States has to go vs. One T. Rex, I suggest we let 45 fight it personally.

(via patrickat)