kellyclowers:

pearl-likes-pi:

pearll:

bearhats:

ghostpriism:

iamgonnaburninhell:

setheverman:

strange-estrangement:

enecoo:

murkmen:

midclown120boos:

sophistdefunk:

strongbadgmail:

bishonenknife:

sympolite:

hornyonmainstreet:

moonlight-murakumo:

yanosblack:

hotboyproblems:

gucciballs:

2jams:

official-medjed:

3d-gyaru:

questionablegoat:

clinically-weird:

youdidntseeanytin:

professional-bathroom-singer:

mrcuddelyhydralisk:

squided:

breadoslicks:

numberonephantompizza1:

dsmaster7173:

q–cool:

candi-mocha:

candi-mocha:

son-of-joy:

sovietsofficial:

friend-san:

ness-paula:

tumblingoverstars:

casuallysippingajuicebox:

fvace:

pupsnout:

robloxgf:

the-real-ted-cruz:

lesbianpoodles:

babadoussy:

black-dragonize:

meropischao:

lawoftalos:

mobliz:

heyeayeayea:

repaying:

whereshadowsmakeshadows:

ssjgssjgoku:

izurp:

pecancat:

pecancat:

izurp:

pecancat:

staff:

   Just added “Likes”: an easy way  their p sts.

staff:

   Just added “Likes”: an easy way  their p sts.

#this post is a fucking disaster

                                      pecancat:

raissek ujikawa:

raissekujikawa:

clenemtine:

pecancat:

raissekujikawa

minoji

izurp:

pecancat:

                                      pecancat:

raissek ujikawa:

pecancat:

ra :

pecancat:     

staff:

   Just added “Likes”: an easy way  their p sts.

#this post is a fucking disaster

AAAAAAAAAAAAJGHHHHFHHHHHHHGGGHHHHHHHHHGJHHHHGHHGGGGGGGGGH

An ode to the 

  • ultimate blogging

this gave me an aneurysm

what the fuck

How did this even fucking happen

This happens through advanced programming that allows posts visible only by your Third Eye

Wtf happened to this post

the ultimate blogging

epic 😼👍

corvusvulpes:

clatterbane:

thebibliosphere:

bobafloutist:

thebibliosphere:

hedgewitchwanderings:

thebibliosphere:

churchyardgrim:

thebibliosphere:

thebibliosphere:

“Okay I didn’t read all of this but,”

Then👏 Why 👏The👏 Fuck 👏Are 👏You 👏Commenting👏

Hot fucking take, if a post is long and informative, you likely need to read all of it to make an informed contribution to the topic instead of just talking over people or dismissing them based on the first few lines of opening up a dialogue.

“Honestly I read the first few lines and this is bullshit, I—”

Oh you read the first few lines. Of a multi-thread reblog post, where others have put time and effort into trying to convey a complex issue, but y’know. You read the first few lines, and felt like you had something to say and are convinced it will be in no way irrelevant, repetitive or refutable. Okay. Great.

They read the first few lines, you guys, we’re good.

istg this is one of the biggest frustrations I run into these days. I put time and effort into laying out my perspective and my reasonings and all I get back is “who’s going to read that fucking essay, try harder”

it’s unspeakably rude! it’s a staggering lack of good faith, plain disrespect towards someone who’s trying to have an actual discussion, and I literally cannot understand why people think it’s any kind of an appropriate way to behave.

It. Drives. Me. Bonkers.

“Condense your life experiences and perspective into a soundbite so it looks on brand for quick and snappy reblogs so we can all feel woke about it.”

The same person a hot second later. “Well there’s no perspectives or proof to back this up so your point is invalid.”

*flips table*

Ok. I do genuinely understand where everyone is coming from here. I do recognise that it is exceptionally frustrating when someone is actually being lazy and genuinely can’t be bothered to read because they just want to yap their mouth off etc.

That being said.

Can we *please* be aware that people with ADHD and other processing issues exist and in those cases, because the person may have read a bit, had a thought and want to get it down, they start writing their ideas before they’ve read it completely so the thought doesn’t vanish. Furthermore, because of said processing issues a proper explanation would be ‘I haven’t read all of this, (I have ADHD and wanted to get this thought down before I forget) but (I fully intend to read the rest), anyway my thought was…’ and the bits in brackets are what doesn’t make it to the response because their processing has caused them to delete those bits from their short term memory while writing.

Also, sorry to have to say it, but if you’re more concerned about coming across eloquently and so forth, then basically you’re admitting that you’ve written a long response just to show off that you’re clever.

Fine, absolutely, someone who’s being lazy should just read it through.

However, I know for a fact that if a post is quite long, people with processing issues may find it daunting and would actually appreciate a condensed version so they can more easily follow the conversation and contribute.

Yes, I write long posts but if someone reblogged a post asking me to condense it for their understanding, I absolutely would.

If I can do that, there’s no reason you can’t and if you’re going to grumble about it, it shows that first and foremost you’re happy to shove people with processing issues under the bus in favour of being able to show off.

I apologise if this comes across as unnecessarily harsh but I think more people need to think about the ways in which they engage in actual ableism.

If you’re automatic response to ‘could you explain this’ is to accuse people of laziness, the only people you are hurting is those with processing issues. The people who are genuinely just being lazy will just strop at you and digitally storm off.

Meanwhile you will leave someone with an issue they cannot change, because it is hardwired, feeling bad about themselves and more likely to not engage with topics of interest, because they’ll be accused of laziness for being overwhelmed by the amount of text etc.

As someone with ADHD, this is not even remotely what this post is about.

It’s the venting of a personal frustration that I expend so much energy and focus trying to explain things to people, being as concise, relevant and thorough as possible, (because inevitably someone always tags on “but what about X issue! why are you being problematic and missing out X issue!”) and then some rude person comments with the lengthier version of “tl;dr” and then proceeds to talk over everyone else in the comment thread, either being needlessly repetitive because they didn’t read the comments, or just outright wrong or just plain dismissive.

Someone needs me to condense and clarify, I will. I absolutely will. But the way to get me to do that is not to say “I didn’t read all of this, but here’s my opinion anyway.”

It’s a post about people butting in where they should take the time to sit down and process something rather than interjecting for the sake of hearing their own voice.

Yeah, no, I have ADHD and if I’m invested enough in a long post to respond, I’m nine times out of ten going to be interested enough to read the whole thing.

Mistakes in reading comprehension or a series of working memory failures like described above are one thing, but they’re a tiny fraction of the people just literally saying “Lol I’m not gonna read this”.

Which – a metaphor that might help: ADHD makes it more difficult to allow someone to finish their point before jumping in, interrupting them to get to your point. It’s SO tempting to just constantly interrupt people, because they’re taking TOO LONG, and you’ll forget your point or it won’t be relevant anymore – but that doesn’t make it ok to just constantly talk over people when you have ADHD. Reading the first few sentences of a long post and saying “Fuck finishing this, here’s what I have to say” is roughly equivalent to interrupting someone’s point to get to your own, making it clear that you don’t care what they have to say. And while that’s sometimes appropriate, just be aware of the message you’re sending by doing so. If you don’t care what Joy has to say, why are you following or reblogging her?

Oh god the need to interject and say something before I forget it is so fucking real and I’ve had to train myself not to do it while speaking to others. (Now I just look like the rude asshole always on my phone, when actually I am opening up the notepad or a blank text and writing myself a note to REMEMBER THE THING because I will lose thoughts within a 30 second gap of time sometimes)

And it does happen when I’m reading posts and a thought forms too. But you know what I do, I open up a new tab or a word document and I start processing it there so that the person “speaking” doesn’t wind up feeling dismissed or talked over. And sometimes if I keep reading long enough, I find out that what I was about to interject with was already said, and a simple “this” or “I support this” is all that is necessary.

What I do not do, is comment on posts where people are clearly putting in time and effort, and reply with “Okay I didn’t read this, but here are my thoughts.”

Like, there is a profound difference between that and “Okay this was lengthy and I struggled with this, can you explain it again or let me know if I got the gist of it?”

Writing your thoughts down, so as not to lose them is such a helpful idea. I can really use this as I tend to interrupt or just not speak much at all, I lose so many ideas an comments  because of this. so cool, thanks.

As someone with ADHD and other issues with memory and comprehension ( especially of written things) if I can’t read all of one thing and comprehend it I will generally pass on commenting until I either figure out what is being said or I just think, “Ehh,can’t do words today, I’ll pass for now”, what I don’t do is type “LOL I didn’t read this but…” 

Pretty sure most of the “LOL didn’t read this, but…”  folks are the I have an opinion on this and you are wrong and what I think must be said sorts, who kinda like to make sure everyone KNOWS they are right. They reall like to go after more popular blogs, ‘cause people with little audiences tend to not get those kinds of responses.

soilrockslove:

acemindbreaker:

elodieunderglass:

wodneswynn:

wodneswynn:

“So-and-so identity I’m prejudiced against is gonna use up all the LGBT resources!” like this is fuckin Age of Empires II or some shit

Reblog if you can’t build any more castles or upgrade your longbowmen because some sneaky asexuals are camping on all the wood and stone

…and EVERY time a bisexual walks past your sheep, the sheep immediately take up wearing matching trendy fashionable pride bandannas and start following THEM??

Bisexuals are Celts.

“Bisexuals means you are attracted to exactly two things, fine I choose awesome, well-forged spears and a solid oral tradition.”

derinthemadscientist:

snapslikethis:

my child co-founded an informal harry potter club at school last week. this week, all clubs were officially disbanded by the teacher. in an ironic twist, my child (who hasn’t read ootp yet) said today, ‘but that doesn’t mean a group of friends can’t get together and talk about harry potter. we just can’t say that we’re a club’

Life imitates art pre-emptively

awed-frog:

If you’re in need of ‘faith in humanity: restored’ news, a duck suddenly appeared on a remote island in the Pacific and no one’s sure how he even made it (the closest landmass, New Zealand, is about 1700 miles away) but, like, the entire population is now devoted to the duck’s wellbeing and that’s the first duck they’ve ever seen so they named him and Googled what he eats (not bread!) and built him an artificial pond and now ‘there are concerns he might be lonely’, so there’s talk of importing other ducks to keep him company and yeah, the world is still batshit insane but isn’t this the sweetest thing?

Anyway, meet Trevor.