f1m2pete:

unknought:

By all means talk about the sexism involved in responses to female victims of rape and abuse coming forward, but please don’t pretend like male victims are always treated with respect and taken seriously. That’s really, really not true.

Our society has a deep instinct to victim blame, no matter who the victim is

ellethinthewoods:

me, before eating: the world is a callous, empty thing, and i have no place in it – nor any place in myself, being a creature of hollowness, emptiness, unable to describe my own feelings and tell the condition of my own body…my skin is foreign to me, my well being, unknowable…the sky of my mind darkens with innumerable thoughts and i cannot discern their source or find their cure…i must sleep now, and so die, a stranger in my own body…

me, after eating: oh hey, guess i was just super hungry

Plausible deniability is all Jeff Flake and Lisa Murkowski want

politicalprof:

Remember: they didn’t support a delay because they believe Dr. Ford. They didn’t support it because they distrusted Brett Kavanaugh. They didn’t support a delay because they’re seriously considering voting against Kavanaugh.

They just want to go back to their friends, and in Murkowski’s case their voters, and say they had credible reasons to vote for Kavanaugh, and not enough reasons not to. They’re looking for an excuse to do what they already want to do anyway.

aegipan-omnicorn:

skusher23-22:

honeybruh:

so here’s a quick lesson about having patience with kids.

I have a 6th grade student who isn’t really interested in doing her homework (big surprise). from my experience, kids who aren’t trying to do their homework usually fall into two general categories – “this is too easy and therefore boring” and “this is too hard and therefore i’m not even going to attempt”. it became clear by October that she fell into the latter group, but most of the staff chalked it up to “she doesn’t understand it”. I didn’t really believe it because she was a very smart, emotionally aware girl and it didn’t seem like she didn’t always want to try, just that she would rather do other things than struggle with her work. 

yesterday, she got sent to my office, just so that she would have a space away from her friends to focus on her work, and she asked me to help her with two questions. I looked at them and they were fairly straightforward, simple questions about the results of using various amounts of force on an object. I did what I always do – I read the question out loud first, and then tried to help her use recall to figure it out. she did in a snap. I did the same with the second question, and before I even finished it, she went “OH!” and started writing her answer.

that’s when it hit me – she doesn’t have trouble with the material, she just has trouble reading and processing what she’s reading at the same time. big difference! I asked her and she confirmed that it was easier to hear a question and understand it than to read it and understand it. so I got her phone out, pulled up her voice recorder, and told her to try reading the question aloud and then playing it back to herself so she could process it and she looked like i had handed her the holy grail.

the moral of the story is that sometimes you have to set aside what you think is a problem with a kid and just watch for what’s easier for them. will she be able to do that during a test? maybe not, BUT now that she knows that the issue is processing reading and that she’s an auditory learner, she’s in a better position to ask for resources to help her work better in school.

so i’m off to the school counselor to let her know so she can possible get more tools for auditory learners.  

People like this are amazing, seriously. I really admire their patience and their will of wanting understand kids, in this case, and trying to solve the problems. Great lesson here

I think, sometimes (i.e. often), it takes more patience to deal with the adults who dole out resources than it does to deal with the kids who need them…

shieldmaiden19:

theroguefeminist:

anhasia:

theroguefeminist:

meta-hemeralism:

snakegay:

tomibunny:

rottenlesbian:

rottenlesbian:

please stop reblogging sylvia plath poetry 

For ppl asking why she’s an anti black, anti Semite. She has used the n word and compared her depression to the holocaust

Even not counting her poetry her private journals are full of disgusting, overblown antisemitism. She didn’t just use Jewish people for her metaphors, she outright hated them irl and yet decided to use their suffering for her own gain

here’s a source with some quotes

okay, I’m Jewish and I appreciate this sentiment. and if someone wants to cut out Sylvia Plath, go for it, I get it.

But. by this logic we’d also need to stop reblogging TS Eliot, Oscar Wilde, and Shakespeare quotes. Virginia Woolf wrote anti-semetic things in her private journals, too. If you only want to read classic poets who liked Jews and black people, that’s fine, but like. good luck? Sylvia Plath isn’t an exception.

idk. Tumblr’s attitude of “consume nothing problematic” just doesn’t work if you’re part of a group that most culture-creators over the last few centuries have hated by default. For people actually in those groups, it’s not like the only two choices are 1) worship authors who hate you or 2) completely cut the majority of literature out of your life. You learn to read critically and acknowledge flaws where you find them.

anyway, as a Jewish woman, I would much rather see a version of this post that said “please read Sylvia Plath poetry critically because she’s anti black and antisemetic” than just “stop reblogging Sylvia Plath poetry.”

IMO, reblog Sylvia Plath all you want, just not unthinkingly.

I’m reblogging this now because I’m seeing anti-Virginia Woolf discourse lately due to the antisemitism in her journals and like… as a Jewish person who loves Virginia Woolf’s writing and an English teacher who knows that pretty much every writer of the classics is Problematic just…chill pls

The point isn’t to never consume media that isn’t ideologically pure. That’s never the point. Were that the goal, we would NEVER be able to consume any media. Nothing is ever ideologically pure, especially as time goes on and our social consciousness expands.

We should be telling people instead, “Be critical as you read this person’s work. They held bigoted views. Understand how that is reflected in their work, and be mindful of it. Be critical, be thoughtful”

Compelling others to not engage with something at ALL on ideological grounds is in the same vein as burning books. We should be compelling others to be critical and mindful, not narrow and willfully ignorant.

Yeah, I think the only exception is when the creator is still alive and you don’t want to financially support them. That, and if you’re a teacher and deciding what to teach and why, this issue becomes a little more complex. Otherwise, this approach is the only one that makes sense.

Exactly.