Do you ever lean or position yourself in therapy to make eye contact or see a client that is not looking at you or have turned away from you? And do you ever ask them to atleast look in your direction? Why or why not?

neurodiversitysci:

therapy101:

it really depends on the context and the client, for me. I work with some clients who have difficulty making eye contact and engaging in other pro-social behavior. If they want to change those things, then one of the best things I can do to help them is to have them practice with me in session. In that context, I have asked a client to look at me, and help them find a way to do so comfortably. In other contexts I wouldn’t do that. I might ask about lack of eye contact, to see where it’s coming from. At the same time I’ve worked in some clinical settings where the position of our chairs makes it harder to have easy, consistent eye contact, so in those settings I was more flexible when people chose to look straight ahead rather than at me. 

______

If you enjoyed this post, consider making a pledge at Patreon to support Therapy101 and access to information about psychology and mental health.

I think it’s important to pay attention to eye contact when teaching, because it can tell you a lot. Often, when there’s a lot to process cognitively or emotionally, people will look away, whether neurotypical or neurodivergent. If I were a therapist, I would treat looking away as a clue that the client was making more effort. Maybe they’re dealing with stronger emotions, or fighting an urge to suppress them, or feeling uncomfortable talking about them, or having difficulty finding the words to talk about them, or angry at me but feeling guilty saying so… (these are all reasons I’ve looked away and I’ve seen other people do many of these, too).

Of course, autism or other disabilities can affect the exact meaning of dropping eye contact, and you need to compare it to a baseline of how much the person normally makes eye contact before you can accurately interpret.

If I were a therapist, SLP, or someone else who offered advice on communication, I would point out when a client drops eye contact, and ask them if they’re aware of it. Behavior like this is often done unconsciously, and telling clients about it can help them become more aware of how they’re feeling and communicating in the moment. Pointing out emotional reactions and nonverbal behavior is a common, and effective, therapeutic technique. You use the way a client interacts with you as a window into how they might interact with people in other areas of their lives.

I would not encourage a client to make more eye contact unless the client specifically asked me to teach them to do so. I don’t want to distract them and make them uncomfortable. 

In addition to variables like seating, I would take into account clients’ cultures of origin, too. Many cultures use less eye contact than middle class Americans do, and it may be seen as less friendly and more aggressive.

If you’re neurodivergent and don’t make a lot of eye contact, does that seem respectful? What would you do if trying to help someone who doesn’t make much eye contact?

I would also explicitly add “middle-class Americans from the dominant culture” and/or “from the a similar cultural background to the professional’s” there.

Speaking as someone likely to be read as more generally middle-class American, who is coming from a culture within the US where my neurodivergent eye contact patterns never really stood out as unacceptably odd.

Overall, well said.

In general, it’s probably better not to assume that you understand what another person’s unexpected eye contact and body language patterns are intended to communicate. Maybe especially if your interpretations of that do conflict with what they are saying.That may well be down to any of a variety of factors leading to miscommunication, and not so much the other person being deceptive and/or showing poor insight.

(Partly based on experience dealing with faulty assumptions like that, yes.)

caitatonic:

All right you guys! The Affordable Care Act (also known as “Obamacare”) open enrollment period starts in EXACTLY ONE MONTH from today! Thursday, November 1, 2018, to Saturday, December 15, 2018. As soon as it opens, at least go LOOK at what you might be eligible for.

neo-sigma:

renegon-paragade:

bigfootismyonlyfriend:

hot take but girls with ADHD don’t ‘present differently’, it’s just that misogyny punishes girls and people read as girls a lot more severely for their ADHD symptoms so most girls become way more proficient at masking their symptoms so end up being left undiagnosed and then just develop depression, anxiety, trauma and burnout over not being able to meet standards that are difficult if not impossible for people with ADHD and being harshly reprimanded for it

This goes for autism too! Also some of the ways people present for both are considered ways that girls should act or brushed off as just some silly but normal girl thing (examples off the top of my head: going nonverbal or walking on tip-toes). That’s why when guys act the same way they get diagnosed, because they are “acting weird” aka “girly”

Similarly, autism can make it so a lot of girls don’t present as feminine, so they get criticised for behaviors that autistic boys might get away with.

Exactly the same behavior from members of various groups (assigned gender, race, ethnic group, class background, take your pick) can be interpreted very, very differently according to cultural expectations. Along with which explanations are even considered for that behavior, based on assumptions and stereotyping.

The increasing emphasis on “Group X just inevitably present differently!”–or “inevitably employ masking in exactly the same predictable ways”, for that matter–doesn’t really help with sorting out the bias factors. Kinda the reverse. That can too easily turn prescriptive in the same ways, especially if it’s used to dance around the question of professional bias.