prideflagharold:

prideflagharold:

hey guys! i really hate to make this post but my cat, gus, has been having lots of urinary tract issues as of late. i make a little bit more than minimum wage (and i have other bills/expenses i’m currently trying to take care of) and my parents don’t have a lot of access money. they want to give him to a shelter or find a new home, but i feel so terrible about it. if you have any amount you’d like to donate to help pay for his veterinarian fees & medicated food, please consider donating to my paypal below. i’ll try and post more updates!

https://www.paypal.me/marymarglou

https://venmo.com/code?user_id=2306811382202368058

here’s my venmo as well!! 💛

Unexpected Expenses, the working-class saga

vaspider:

So, @dadhoc needs dental work that Medicaid won’t pay for, which is necessary for them, and has been put off to the point it can’t be put off anymore. 

We need to come up with $750 ASAP in order to get this work done for them, so, like. If you have been thinking about buying something from our shop? Please do so. If you aren’t absolutely in love with the stuff we sell but still wanna help? Our PayPal is here, and also I write queer fiction which you can get for $1. Anything helps, honestly. 

Thanks, friends. ❤ 

aka14kgold:

maritsa-met:

“Those results would reveal that 83 percent of black and 66 percent of Latinx voters believe Blasey Ford, compared to a mere 40 percent of white voters. And that 80 percent of black and 69 percent of Latinx voters considered her honest compared to just 54 percent of white voters.

This gap persists even when you isolate out white women, a demographic some pundits believed would be outraged at how Blasey Ford was treated by Senate Republicans (her testimony—deemed “credible” by Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee—was essentially thrown out once Kavanaugh began rage-crying).

According to the Quinnipiac poll, nearly half (47 percent) of white women considered Kavanaugh to be honest. The numbers for black and Latinx voters? Just 7 and 34 percent, respectively. A plurality of white women did believe Blasey Ford (46 percent)—but it was nowhere near the majority, as was the case with black and Latinx voters.

Parsing out this data matters, because if journalists don’t, they can misleadingly run with narratives like the one in a recent article from the AP, which boldly declared in the headline: “Many women line up in support for Kavanaugh.”

In other words, the exact same breakdown as the ‘16 election.

And now we get a Trumpesque baby on the SCOTUS.

ace-and-ranty:

jumpingjacktrash:

cookingwithroxy:

lesbiangender:

wild idea here but… instead of pushing this idea that teenagers can’t be asexual bc they’re children and not wanting sex is normal, how about “if you identify as ace as a teenager but later realize you just didn’t want sex bc you were a kid and stop identifying that way, that’s okay” and realizing that doesn’t mean no one can know they’re asexual as a teenager and stop maybe telling asexual teenagers that they’re too young to be ace bc that’s really weird given that teenagers are cetainly capable of being non-asexual also you totally can’t decide something like that for someone else

‘Here is your label, you can never change it’ is one of the most toxic things I’ve ever seen and honestly is the worst parts of pretty much any community there is. It keeps people from being willing to change or even self-reflect, because once they get a label it’s impossible to free themselves from it. And it’s behind all the ridiculous ‘well at one point you said a thing that all these years later in a different context doesn’t sound all that good so you’re a bigot and everything you do is terrible’ nonsense going around this hellsite.

teenagers especially need to be able to say “this is where i’m at now, it could change later, it’s valid either way,” because they’re still evolving really fast

anyone at any time in life can discover something new about themself and no one gets to tell them what they’re feeling

YES, and also??

The argument that “you could find out in the future you’re not ace, so you can’t identify as ace NOW” has an underlying sense that… identifying as ace is BAD. It makes it sound like identifying as ace is something you absolutely should not do until you’re 100% certain, because maybe it isn’t that bad, maybe you’re normal and you just don’t know it yet!

It’s the same mentality, I find, as people who think being gay or lesbian is a horrible fate you wouldn’t chose if you could, something you would change if it was possible. The same mentality that says you can’t be trans unless you’re horribly dysphoric all the time.

They treat the decision of identifying as asexual as some serious life-sentence instead of, you know, a simple way of exploring your identity??