i see a lot of quotes from Lundy Bancroft’s excellent book Why Does He Do That circulating on this website, but i’ve never really seen the last chapter quoted. So this is an excerpt from it: “Creating an Abuse-free World”.
(A note: the book is written for women who suffer intimate partner violence at the hands of men, because it is sorely needed and because that’s what the author has professional experience with. However, this insight is valuable for people of all genders, and also in situations in which the abuser is not a partner or former partner.)
“How can I help my daughter, sister, or friend who is being abused?
If you would like to make a significant difference in the life of an abused woman you care about, keep the following principle fresh in your mind: your goal is to be the complete opposite of what the abuser is.
THE ABUSER: Pressures her severely
SO YOU SHOULD: Be patient. Remember that it takes time for an abused woman to sort out her confusion and figure out how to handle her situation. It is not helpful for her to try to follow your timetable for when she should stand up to her partner, leave him, call the police, or whatever step you want her to take. You need to respect her judgement regarding when she is ready to take action – something her abuser never does.
THE ABUSER: Talks down to her
SO YOU SHOULD: Address her as an equal. Avoid all traces of condescension or superior knowledge in your voice. This caution applies just as much or more to professionals. If you speak to an abused woman as if you are smarter or wiser than she is, or as if she is going through something that could never happen to you, then you inadvertently confirm exactly what the abuser has been telling her, which is that she is beneath him. Remember, your actions speak louder than your words.
THE ABUSER: Thinks he knows what is good for her better than she does
SO YOU SHOULD: Treat her as the expert on her own life. Don’t assume that you know what she needs to do. I have sometimes given abused women suggestions that I thought were exactly right but turned out to be terrible for that particular situation. Ask her what she thinks might work and, without pressuring her, offer suggestions, respecting her explanations for why certain courses of action would not be helpful. Don’t tell her what to do.
THE ABUSER: Dominates conversations
SO YOU SHOULD: Listen more and talk less. The temptation may be great to convince her what a “jerk” he is, to analyze his motives, to give speeches covering entire chapters of this book. But talking too much inadvertently communicates to her that your thoughts are more important than hers, which is exactly how the abuser treats her. If you want her to value her own feelings and opinions, then you have to show her that you value them.
THE ABUSER: Believes he has the right to control her life
SO YOU SHOULD: Respect her right to self-determination. She is entitled to make decisions that are not exactly what you would choose, including the decision to stay with her abusive partner or to return to him after a separation. You can’t convince a woman that her life belongs to her if you are simultaneously acting like it belongs to you. Stay by her even when she makes choices that you don’t like.
THE ABUSER: Assumes he understands her children and their needs better than she does
SO YOU SHOULD: Assume that she is a competent, caring mother. Remember that there is no simple way to determine what is best for the children of an abused woman. Even if she leaves the abuser, the children’s problems are not necessarily over, and sometimes abusers actually create worse difficulties for the children postseparation than before. You cannot help her to find the best path for her children unless you have a realistic grasp of the complicated set of choices that face her.
THE ABUSER: Thinks for her
SO YOU SHOULD: Think with her. Don’t assume the role of teacher or rescuer. Instead, join forces with her as a respectful and equal team member.
Notice that being the opposite of the abuser does not simply mean saying the opposite of what he says. If he beseeches her with “Don’t leave me, don’t leave me,” and you stand on the other side badgering her with, “Leave him, leave him,” she will feel that you’re much like him; you are both pressuring her to accept your judgement of what she should do. Neither of you is asking the empowering question, “What do you want to do?”
Day: October 26, 2018
From Hitler’s virulent hatred of modern art, presumably in contrast to his mediocre still lifes, to the modern “anti-SJW’s” hatred of dyed hair and insistence that Being Conservative Is Punk Now, one thing remains consistent among all reactionaries:
They are deeply aware that everyone even remotely cool or interesting thinks they’re losers, and they are mad about it.

I’ll have another
Recently started a collection of vintage postage stamp imagery.
My brother just sent me this on snapchat I can’t fucking stop laughing this is so stupid I hate him
The Illiberalism of Prenatal Selection
CN eugenics
“It is impossible to understand disability without taking into account social, cultural, and technological factors that may impede or enhance well-being.”
Forcing people to diet is abusive.
It’s wrong.
It’s wrong when people do it to their kids, and it’s wrong when people do it to their partners.
Would you mind elaborating on why the right to bodily autonomy trumps the right to life? It’s an ethical debate I’ve struggled with, and it would be awesome to have someone else’s perspective. Thank you!!
Because we have legal precedence of a right to bodily autonomy but not life. People are not forced to donate blood/organs/tissues to save the lives of others, regardless of relationship or reason of need. Parents do not have to donate to children, even though they are the reason those children exist. People needing organ donations are allowed to die on waitlists even though we put millions of perfectly good organs into the ground or crematoriums if the people who had those organs didn’t give consent for them to be taken after death. That’s how much we value bodily autonomy over people’s lives. Those organs literally do nothing but rot in the ground but corpses’ wishes are respected.
Now consider pregnant people who wish to have abortions, who are told that fetuses, a neutral party that doesn’t even know it exists, deserve to be able to gestate without enthusiastic consent. Doesn’t matter if the pregnant person goes into poverty over it. Doesn’t matter if their existing kids suffer. Doesn’t matter if they’re kicked out of school, abused by their families, experience dysphoria, nothing. That fetus deserves to control your body because you dared to have sex. That’s all it takes for people who can get pregnant to have fewer rights than a dead body. That’s how little we value people who can get pregnant and their rights as human beings.
The right to life does not exist. If it did, the world would revolve very differently than it currently does. The “right to life” is a convenient line trotted out to justify the misogynistic oppression and control of pregnant people.
-V
Absolutely perfect summation. Thank you.



You must be logged in to post a comment.