withthingsunreal:

arithanas:

gaylileofigaro:

This is worse. Looking at these you can tell they have no significant monetary value. They were confiscated as a fear tactic. Nothing more.

This picture breaks my heart everytime it appears in my dash. It’s a fear tactic, alright but—

The first one in the left corner: It’s a first communion rosary, and it’s not cheap.

The black one in the first line: That’s a widow rosary and it’s old.

The white one in the second line:  is a commemoration rosary. It has a miniature picture in the round part. I haven’t seen that since the 70′s.

In the third line, multicolor one: It’s an Anima mundi, I have only seen those in the hands of Rosary ministery’s old ladies. The oldest ones are from the 80′s after Juan Pablo II came to Mexico for the first time. It’s one of the old ones, I know because the crucifixes are different. 

The third one on the fourth line: Red and gold. The style is old, the metal is dark, that’s a 50′s rosary, probably a quinceañera one (or it’s maybe older, from the 40′s when the brides carried red roses with their offerings).

The fifth one on the fourth line: It’s a quinceañera rosary with Ignatius’s tear. The style is old and in my part of Mexico is orphan girls who used it. At least it was when I was young.

The third one of the fifth line: the blue one with the anchor. That one I have only seen in Veracruz and it doesn’t look new.

The fifth one on the fifth line: That’s a 90′s wedding rosary. Black and white patterns were popular on that date.

The fourth one on the last line: That’s a first communion rosary from the 30′s. It’s delicate and most probably silver.

The rest wrench my heart too, the humble everyday rosaries with wooden beads and knots. Those are cheap and bear the wear and tear of their user handling. But those  I described are much more.

Those are mother’s rosaries.

Those are not just rosaries. Those are mementos, that’s the proof of their families stories. They are taking from them the only portable things they can carry to feel the connection to their families.

It’s not a fear tactic. Call it like by its name.

It’s dehumanization.

I’m usually not one to add on to posts but I want to be clear on something here.

the photographer’s name is Tom Kiefer, and according to his own website, he began this photo project (El Sueño Americano) in 2007.

here is an article from October 2015 which includes the photo show above

here is another from January 2016

the unfortunate truth is that when the Trump administration claims to be in line with policies already in place…. they aren’t necessarily lying. in some cases they are simply under heavier scrutiny for human rights violations than the previous administration. because, as John Mulaney so succinctly put it, we’re lazy by nature, and the last guy seemed like he was doing okay.

I’m not bashing Obama, and I’m not giving Trump a pass. I’m saying EVERYONE needs to do better, and these problems are not new. the attention it’s getting is new, and important, and I hope it makes a difference. but this country has been on its bullshit for a long time.

I have no idea how good this may be, but I guess we’ll find out before too long.

The ingredients looked reasonable, so it’s hopefully OK with some seasoning adjustment. And maybe not as much of that, since it’s Italian-made.

Mr. C is off with friends to some beer festival tonight, so I decided to grab something easy that he wouldn’t want to eat 😊 This seemed to fit the bill, with linguine and some fried zucchini on the side.

(Still haven’t quite decided if I want to chunk that up to cook with some onions and probably garlic, or just slice and sear with a little olive oil and adobo seasoning. Hungry enough to make decisions harder, too.)

Though, reminded again with that last link on the (rather recent) history of US immigration law? I do get tired of the idea that colonialism suddenly ended in what’s now the US, in 1776/1783/whatever.

It’s very convenient. And requires an amazing amount of cognitive dissonance.

beachgirlnikita:

ultrajchapmanstuff:

mikedawwwson:

Why Did They Come?

TOO FUCKIN’ phenomenal to NOT reblog!!!!

Immigration laws really only became a thing in the 20th century, with the exception of Asians; there were exclusionary laws on them before that.  The biggest changes to immigration laws came in 1965 and 1997, becoming a lot more restrictive then.  If you came in the 1800′s especially before Ellis Island, you just showed up and stayed. 

Cheat sheet on immigration laws – There Is No Line

purplesaline:

wayhaughtt:

andromedoid:

“Are you ticklish” is such a loaded question. If you say no they’ll test it. If you say yes they’ll test it. Just tickle me. Get it over with. Subject me to this horror soon so that I may begin my healing process. 

My 7th grade English teacher told us the proper response to “are you tickleish?” Is “I have diarrhea”

I just scream “HARD LIMIT!!!”

And if they understand they back away immediately and respect it and if they don’t they’re confused and want an explanation which has how distracted them from wanting to tickle me.