batzendrick:

fuck-customers:

The next person who tries to correct me when I say “Happy Holidays” is going to be told Happy Hanukkah instead. Very tired of hearing, “No, it’s MERRY CHRISTMAS.” I’m pretty sure Judaism was around a lot longer than your Buckstar’s boycotting butt, Karen.

My boss once shared a great story about that. This happened when he was in a layover in North Carolina back when the “War on Christmas” bullshit was first becoming prominent. He had gone to get a pack of cigarettes, and after he paid for it:

“Merry Christmas.”
“Happy holidays.”
No. I said Merry Christmas.”
“Do you know what Hanukkah is about?”
“No, what?”
“Some people tried to make us worship their ways, so we rose up and killed them. Happy Hanukkah.

bootylesbian:

bootylesbian:

bootylesbian:

Don’t tell Native butches to cut their hair short.

Don’t comment on their hair at all tbh. Whether it’s long or short or shaven or braided or any mix.

It is callous and unneeded. You do not need to understand how hair plays into our gender expression and culture.

foreverpsg:

Please everyone, take a minute and spread awareness for Net Neutrality in Canada. These telecom companies are the absolute worst. They give you TV channels for years and then “take it away”(without your contract changing), they hike up the price of cellphone contracts(along with Apple geofixing products that, even with the exchange rate are $100 cheaper in the USA).
These things are so necessary in today’s world, but have become so inflated and expensive it isn’t feasible. Can you imagine paying $200 for a cellphone, as well as $70/month for the newest iPhone/Samsung?
Canadians are paying some of the highest rates worldwide for cellular, television and Internet contracts by these companies, and now they want to make it even more expensive.

Indigenous woman registers to run for Mexican presidency in 2018

tejuina:

her name is maría de jesús patricio martínez, and:

1. for those of you who only read the headline, please note that she needs to gather 800,000+ signatures for her to actually be included in the elections. if she does not gather those signatures, her name will not appear on the ballot. last I heard, they hadn’t even gathered 10% of the signatures needed and there’s only about two months left.

it is unlikely she’ll get elected as president, and at this point it also seems unlikely she’ll even appear on the ballot. it is important to acknowledge this while also recognizing that she and the CIG (the indigenous governing council she’s representing) have always known this. their efforts to gather signatures are not in vain because it brings attention to indigenous and women’s rights and also serves to start mobilizing those who are desillusioned with the current state of politics but would have never thought to center indigenous communities otherwise.

so if you’re mexican and interested in her politics, don’t wait until the election and get involved now.

2. the CIG is not the political branch of the EZLN (zapatista army for national liberation). they do back her up, but the CIG is not synonymous with the EZLN. she’s not even from a zapatista community, she’s from jalisco (more than a day’s drive away from chiapas, where the EZLN is from). the CIG represents dozens of different indigenous communities from all over the country, only a few of which are zapatistas. it might seem like a minor error, but this kind of misinformation is actually incredibly dangerous and disrespectful to her and to the zapatistas.

here’s a link to the english translation of the zapatistas’ response to criticism of their decision to support the CIG’s desire to have someone run for president, in case anyone wants further information.

Indigenous woman registers to run for Mexican presidency in 2018

A red flag: “I don’t want you to see me as an authority figure”

fullyarticulatedgoldskeleton:

realsocialskills:

If your boss or academic advisor says something like “I don’t want you to see me as an authority figure,” that’s a major red flag. It almost always means that they want to get away with breaking the rules about what powerful people are allowed to do. They’re probably not treating you as an equal. They’re probably trying to exercise more power over you than they should.

Sometimes authority figures say “I don’t want you to see me as an authority figure” because they want you to do free work for them. The logic here works like this:

  • They want you to do something.
  • It’s something that it would be wrong for an authority figure to order you to do.
  • If they were a peer asking for a favor, it would be ok to ask, and also ok for you to say no.
  • The authority figure wants you to obey them, but they don’t want to accept limits on what it’s acceptable to ask you to do.
  • For purposes of “what requests are ok to make”, they don’t want to be seen as an authority figure.
  • They also want you to do what they say. It’s not really a request, because you’re not really free to say no.

For example:

  • It’s usually ok to ask your friends if they would be willing to help you move in exchange for pizza. It’s never ok to ask your employees to do that.
  • It’s sometimes ok to ask a friend to lend you money for medical bills (depending on the relationship). It’s never ok to ask your student to lend you money for a personal emergency.

Sometimes authority figures pretend not to have power because they want to coerce someone into forms of intimacy that require consent. They know that consent isn’t really possible given the power imbalance, so they say “I don’t want you to see me as an authority figure” in hopes that you won’t notice the lines they’re crossing. Sometimes this takes the form of sexual harassment. Sometimes it’s other forms of intimacy. For instance:

  • Abusive emotional intimacy: Excepting you to share your feelings with them, or receive their feelings in a way that’s really only appropriate between friends or in consented-to therapy.
  • Coming to you for ongoing emotional support in dealing with their marital problems.
  • Trying to direct your trauma recovery or “help you overcome disability”.
  • Asking questions about your body beyond things they need to know for work/school related reasons.
  • Expecting you to share all your thoughts and feelings about your personal life.
  • Analyzing you and your life and expecting you to welcome their opinions and find them insightful.
  • Abusive spiritual intimacy: Presuming the right to an opinion on your spiritual life. (Eg: Trying to get you to convert to their religion, telling you that you need to pray, trying to make you into their disciple, telling you that you need to forgive in order to move on with your life.)

If someone says “I don’t want you to see me as an authority figure”, it probably means that they can’t be trusted to maintain good boundaries. (Unless they’re also saying something like “I’m not actually your boss, and you don’t have to do what I say”.) Sometimes they are intentionally trying to get away with breaking the rules. Sometimes it’s less intentional. Some people feel awkward about being powerful and don’t want to think about it. In either case, unacknowledged power is dangerous. In order to do right by people you have power over, you have to be willing to think about the power you’re have and how you’re using it.

Tl;dr If someone has power they don’t want to acknowledge, they probably can’t be trusted to use their power ethically.

I think this goes for people who work for disabled people too. A lot of caregivers seem to prefer to think of themselves as “friends“ of disabled clients. Mostly when someone says “I don’t think of myself as a caregiver, I think of myself as a friend” it’s followed by inappropriate attempts at intimacy (not necessarily sexual) and a complete lack of understanding of what the caregiver-client boundaries are.

Sometimes that includes offering to do the disabled client “special favors” that they later withhold when they get angry, or use as leverage to get something they want in return.

If caregivers think their job doesn’t include listening to disabled people, that’s not a good sign. It means they think the ordinary power balance should be “the disabled person gets no say.”

Compliance Tracking Drugs Violate Human Rights

nosmag-blog:

This is an image of a woman's hand holding a pill. Beside her is an ipad.

Neurodivergent people are one of the few groups who can be deprived of our most basic forms of autonomy and privacy just because of who we are.  This includes confinement in institutional settings such as group homes, nursing homes and residential schools, as well as guardianship and court orders for the misleadingly-named “assisted outpatient treatment.”  Most recently, the United States Food…

View On WordPress