Wikipedia articles invented by a neural network

codeman38:

lewisandquark:

Wikipedia has a page where they list, for entertainment purposes, the titles of a bunch of pages that didn’t meet the cut. These are mostly pages that were submitted as pranks, although a few of them are clever enough that you can’t quite tell. Reader Emily Davis sent me a list of them – here are a few real deleted articles that humans wrote.

List of movie posters with lamps in them
How to trick people into thinking you’re a wizard
List of people who died with tortoises on their heads
People Who delete My Articles have no sense of Humor
Wheeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!
I like eggs
Do scented candles burn faster than unscented candles
An article that contains nothing but a full stop
List of differences between apples and oranges
Category:Farts in literature
Category:Political posters using an octopus
Woo woo woo woo woo woo wah ooooo wah
List of all Wikipedia lists that do not contain themselves

It makes a terrible dataset for a neural network – only 1112 unique entries, some of which are quite long, and big variation in style and subject matter. I decided to try it anyway.

I trained a character-level recurrent neural network (that is, it uses individual letters as building blocks) with a very small memory to prevent it from memorizing the small dataset so quickly. Even so, most of the generated names were either incomprehensible or memorized from the original dataset. Those that weren’t, however, fit right in. It turns out text-generating neural networks are great at mashups and non sequiturs.

Popal chickens
List of U.S. pants
List of the Hamburgers
Category:Athletes with maps
Why Inited States
Evil chicken
Liquid cheese
List of bands with pies on them
Ant Fields are bear hair fetishism
Monster Diseases
Why Won’t Space
Tire bear (country)
What hoop
This page is a very short article
Poople who don’t have beer from sydney
Goat that cookie
Near Dogs
Donkey words in the cartoons
Poople who woo wah the pilot
Death of chicken
What is the day
What fame butt
List of fictional characters with the ball
Who is not leaders
List of parps
Proper programming language
Turdis programming language
Article with a cat
Friends and existence
How to draw a coconut
Tree donkey
Category:People who can’t speed
Panapple
Beer for chickens
Tree Wars
Pants

Whoever it is who likes to enter long strings of repeated characters as pranks (I’m looking at you, Sand Person), the neural network shares your obsession. Repeated text is easier to learn, and so the neural network tends to latch onto it easily and, especially when I give it a short memory, takes repetition to even wilder excess (see: The Cow With No Lips).

Beneral Pissednessessessinessismasticlesismsomic comotute

Woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo wah ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooo ooo on other intortational characters with removable travel

Wich chemical appearaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Note: please do not actually attempt to create these articles on Wikipedia.

Bonus material: sign up here to get some more article titles, including a few that were a bit too rude to post here. 

I trained a neural network on the entire list of Wikipedia article titles a while back! It took a really long time, but it was totally worth it, because the output is frequently hilarious.

Here’s a sampling of some of the titles that it generated in some of my earlier runs:

  • Single and Engineering Act 1982
  • Alan Communication (Australian politician)
  • Discography de la di Corporation (American footballer)
  • The Antarctic Critics County County Team in the Love Days (California)
  • 2004 Snake Cardinal Me For the Moon de Veesi
  • Harry Newbeast Group
  • Children of the Consortion (disambiguation)
  • Wool Controversington’s transport
  • List of Apple St Cannability Lines of Education Productions of San Meridontomy
  • Central Photon State Park

Want more? Check out the #wackypedia tag on my blog! Every once in a while, I’ll fire up the neural network and post new batches of the Wikipedian surrealism that it generates.

codeman38:

After seeing Mara Wilson’s tweet listing a bunch of imaginary British TV shows earlier today (and the even more amazing replies to it), I decided I had to take this to the obvious next step: training a neural network on a list of British TV shows and seeing what kind of nonsense came out.

I ended up using the Wikipedia article “List of British television programmes” as the training data, and here’s a sampling of what resulted. Some of these are far too absurd to be believable—but I can’t be the only one who had to double-check at least a few of these:

  • Mupperial Stophing – situation comedy
  • Peak Chally Life – drama
  • Jericle of the Trial – game show
  • Kitchen Maker Call – situation comedy
  • To the Crubbin Bad – animation/history, reality television/animated
  • Britain’s Next You King – sitcom
  • Beauty and the Come Gene – game show
  • Brief Mine – nature documentary
  • City Frones – documentary drama
  • Yell’s Fortune Satch – documentary/reality
  • Gamezil Hipwist – game show
  • Padfair – drama
  • The Gankstike – detective drama
  • Sunday Vision – comedy/crime drama
  • The Upper Serving – reality
  • Little Here – documentary
  • The Kringe – drama
  • Creasers – drama anthology
  • True Mr.Cry – situation comedy
  • Man to Mine of the Sony – drama
  • Million Pounders – drama
  • Keeping Smakes – game show
  • All Mysteries: The Pie the Meniss – medical drama
  • Crank Street – music/comedy
  • Dull Hour – situation comedy
  • Life on Balls of Sherlock Holmes – detective drama

coryeggs:

Finally some video of what may or may not be the same older surprise bronze cory baby from earlier.

With one of the (not so big yet) adults videobombing toward the end, for a better idea of size.

No idea how old that one might be, or if there are more of the bigger babies lurking somewhere. The one(s) I saw must have been pretty good at hiding up to this point.

And yes, I do have that old small filter I’ve been using to pump water through the hang-on fry tank held together with an ugly striped ponytail elastic. Because it’s what I could find on short notice 🙄

The fish haven’t complained about it yet, at least.

meeresfem:

hobbitsaarebas:

gothiccharmschool:

biwomensupport:

voidbat:

stimmyabby:

You don’t have to be grateful that it isn’t worse.

read that.

read it again, and again, and again.

somebody, somewhere, always has it worse than you. there is one person on this planet that has it the worst of all, and that person is NOT the only person allowed to be unhappy with their lot.

if things are bad for you, they are bad for you. period.

This goes for trauma as well. A lot of times survivors get trapped in a cycle of  minimizing/diminishing their trauma because “other people have it worse” – but there is no hierarchy of trauma. There is no ranking system for which traumas are “better” or “worse.” Your trauma is valid. Period.

IMPORTANT TRUTHS.

As a therapist, lemme just say: almost every trauma survivor I’ve ever had has at some point said “But I didn’t have it as bad as some people” and then talked about how other types of trauma are worse. Even my most-traumatized, most-abused, most psychologically-injured clients say this. 

The ones who were cheated on, abandoned, and neglected say this. The ones who were in dangerous accidents/disasters say this. The ones who were horrifyingly sexually abused say this. The ones who were brutally beaten say this. The ones who were psychologically tortured for decades say this. What does that tell you? That one of the typical side-effects of trauma is to make you believe that you are unworthy of care

Don’t buy into it, because it’s nonsense. It doesn’t matter if someone else had it “worse.” Every person who experiences a trauma deserves to get the attention and care they need to heal from it. 

“one of the typical side-effects of trauma is to make you believe that you are unworthy of care.”

SO true.

actionbell:

rhiannonmcgavin:

saying it again but a feminism that invites people to publicly share and discuss their traumatic experiences, without mentioning any of the potential downfalls or side effects, is so dangerous, for example: if your social media account is public, potential employers could find it, or it could force confrontation within your immediate social sphere, or random strangers could harass you, without even going into mental health aspects of “sharing a story” over and over again. there are ways to break down shame and stigma around trauma without making individual people into platforms, especially when they do not have the legal and financial protection of large celebrities, and there are actual safer spaces to discuss your own trauma, and safer ways to process things, than very public revelation

Also, this type of feminism, mentioned above, makes victims/survivors of trauma, who do not share their stories publicly, feel like they are contributing to the stigma around trauma. Victims/survivors should never be made to feel like their decision, on how they discuss their trauma, contributes to stigma and shame or impedes activism.                     

grandenchanterfiona:

I’m making this a separate post for people to be able to boost it: 

Hey guys, I’m Miri, and on April 20th of this year, I’ll be having my bat mitzvah (Adult bat mitzvah, to clarify). 

I’d like to have a dress I can wear for this, but my nicest dress is only /barely/ knee length on me, and I don’t feel comfortable wearing that up onto the bimah. I feel I should dress more modestly, especially if I’m going to be holding, and reading from, the torah.

I was wondering if anyone who’s a US size 22 or 24 has a dress they no longer want that they’d be willing to give to me that’s longer and more modest. I’m 5′9 or thereabouts and I’d like it to go to midcalf at least.

Sorry for bugging you, and thank you. ❤