To me that’s no better than capitalist profit-centric thinking. It’s disgusting to ever think that we should allow certain people to suffer and die just because designing systems they need is “wasteful of resources” or otherwise “inconvenient”.
Social systems exist for the benefit of people, not the other way around. In communism social systems exist for the benefit of ALL people, NOT JUST A PRIVILEGED FEW.
It takes a special kind of privileged asshole to complain about homeless people using public restrooms
Also the very concept of “restrooms are for paying customers” is classist bullshit that needs to be abolished! You shouldn’t have to pay money to be allowed to shit indoors!
Especially when shitting outdoors is illegal!
Not just illegal, but a really serious public health hazard. Shitting inside is certainly nicer than the alternative for the person doing it, but more importantly, it’s something we as a society all agreed to do so that we wouldn’t have to get cholera anymore.
My husband brought home a horrible pig. It came to the kitchen and began to eat everything on its way. I didn’t know how to get rid of this pig. I prayed the Virgin of Guadalupe and she made so that pig ate my husband’s dinner. Thanks to that he took it to the ranch of his loyal friend.
yes, if it was summer i would bury him but since it is winter cremation is probably for the best, and then i can scatter his ashes down by the dock, his favorite place to go for sniffs, he’d get so excited when we turned down that road.
any help is appreciated, it is looking like it could be between $60-150. paypal email is
They’re plus-size underwear. Put them on a plus-size model. The standard “we’re gonna show you a size 2 but trust us, they come in 3x too!” thing is bad enough, but this time they actually bothered to get a larger size of the product and then put it on a thin woman anyway for some reason.
This does nothing to demonstrate the cut or fit of the underwear i.e. what anyone shopping for clothes online needs to know before buying them. You’ve given plus-size people no information about your plus-size product – thus rendering your entire listing pretty much useless and making people take a shot in the dark – all because you don’t want to show a fat person in underwear.
If I’m buying plus-size underwear, it’s most likely because they are for me and I am a large person. Or possibly that I’m buying them as a gift. But if I’m choosing to buy underwear for another person, I probably have a relationship with that person that involves seeing them in said underwear. It’s not like I haven’t seen fat before. The fact that some people have more flesh is not offensive to me.
Stop marketing fat people clothing toward skinny people.
Showing how your product looks on the bodies that are going to be wearing it is more important than protecting the delicate sensibilities of judgmental fatphobes.
They’re plus-size underwear. Put them on a plus-size model. The standard “we’re gonna show you a size 2 but trust us, they come in 3x too!” thing is bad enough, but this time they actually bothered to get a larger size of the product and then put it on a thin woman anyway for some reason.
This does nothing to demonstrate the cut or fit of the underwear i.e. what anyone shopping for clothes online needs to know before buying them. You’ve given plus-size people no information about your plus-size product – thus rendering your entire listing pretty much useless and making people take a shot in the dark – all because you don’t want to show a fat person in underwear.
If I’m buying plus-size underwear, it’s most likely because they are for me and I am a large person. Or possibly that I’m buying them as a gift. But if I’m choosing to buy underwear for another person, I probably have a relationship with that person that involves seeing them in said underwear. It’s not like I haven’t seen fat before. The fact that some people have more flesh is not offensive to me.
Stop marketing fat people clothing toward skinny people.
Showing how your product looks on the bodies that are going to be wearing it is more important than protecting the delicate sensibilities of judgmental fatphobes.
the worst is that often these are pictures actually taken from “will not rip no matter how much you stretch them” products and stolen for ads for other, low quality products who don’t want to take their own pictures. That famous ad with slim women pulling up their tights up to their chin? That was to advertise that the product would stretch and not rip. It was, originally, never intended to be about size. Idiots took the pictures and used them for plus-sized ads
Urocyon's Jaunts 2.0 
You must be logged in to post a comment.